Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;21(4):1317–1324. doi: 10.1007/s10237-022-01594-1

Table 2.

P-values from two-sided t-test comparing mean RMSE values from contralateral mirroring to that of each shape model reconstruction across each region

Reconstruction geometry Pelvic region
Whole hemipelvis Acetabulum Ilium Ischium Pubis
Intact hemipelvis 0.32 0.46 0.65  < 0.001  < 0.01
IS cut  < 0.001 0.01 0.03  < 0.001  < 0.001
Ilium cut 0.02 0.34  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.01
PT cut 0.82 0.29 0.92  < 0.001  < 0.001

IS, ischial spine protrusion; PT, pubic tubercle