Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2022 May 21;51(9):1798–1814. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01632-2

Table 2.

Latent change score model of the moderation of organizational religiousness between social relationships and alcohol use

Parameter Social Involvement
Social Alienation
Low Religiousness
High Religiousness
Low Religiousness
High Religiousness
Est. SE p Est. SE p Est. SE p Est. SE p
Regression Effects
  SR T1 → AL Δ T1-T2   0.01   0.01 0.175 −0.01   0.01 0.191 −0.03 0.12 0.823   0.04 0.11 0.757
  SR T2 → AL Δ T2-T3   0.01   0.01 0.544   0.01   0.01 0.109   0.22* 0.09 0.019   0.09 0.11 0.416
  SR T3 → AL Δ T3-T4   0.00   0.01 0.857   0.00   0.01 0.968   0.08 0.16 0.606 −0.08 0.15 0.611
  SR T4 → AL Δ T4-T5   0.01   0.01 0.526 −0.01   0.01 0.667   0.33* 0.13 0.010 −0.16 0.18 0.369
  SEX T1 → AL Δ T1-T2   0.01   0.19 0.955   0.06   0.15 0.692   0.03 0.19 0.875   0.05 0.15 0.720
  SEX T2 → AL Δ T2-T3   0.21   0.24 0.375   0.00   0.19 0.985   0.27 0.22 0.226   0.02 0.20 0.933
  SEX T3 → AL Δ T3-T4 −0.11   0.23 0.623   0.05   0.21 0.809 −0.04 0.22 0.868   0.03 0.23 0.912
  SEX T4 → AL Δ T4-T5 −0.37   0.25 0.131   0.18   0.28 0.520 −0.26 0.23 0.251   0.12 0.29 0.668
  RAC T1 → AL Δ T1-T2 −0.20   0.22 0.341   0.26   0.20 0.183 −0.17 0.22 0.430   0.18 0.20 0.367
  RAC T2 → AL Δ T2-T3   0.42   0.27 0.125 −0.27   0.20 0.171   0.33 0.25 0.188 −0.22 0.23 0.337
  RAC T3 → AL Δ T3-T4 −0.02   0.30 0.955   0.12   0.32 0.702   0.02 0.26 0.951   0.14 0.35 0.696
  RAC T4 → AL Δ T4-T5 −0.54   0.35 0.123 −0.50   0.44 0.261 −0.61 0.34 0.068 −0.51 0.46 0.258
  ITN T1 → AL Δ T1-T2 −0.04   0.04 0.414 −0.04   0.03 0.185 −0.03 0.05 0.471 −0.04 0.03 0.149
  ITN T2 → AL Δ T2-T3   0.05   0.05 0.328   0.09   0.05 0.063   0.06 0.05 0.223   0.01* 0.05 0.045
  ITN T3 → AL Δ T3-T4   0.02   0.05 0.619   0.04   0.06 0.544   0.03 0.04 0.503   0.03 0.06 0.618
  ITN T4 → AL Δ T4-T5 −0.02   0.07 0.775 −0.16   0.09 0.061 −0.02 0.07 0.779 −0.17 0.09 0.059
  PAR T1 → AL Δ T1-T2 −0.02   0.10 0.830   0.09   0.09 0.322   0.10 0.13 0.438 −0.06 0.13 0.683
  PAR T2 → AL Δ T2-T3 −0.11   0.12 0.352 −0.21   0.11 0.062 −0.28* 0.12 0.024 −0.16 0.10 0.123
  PAR T3 → AL Δ T3-T4   0.03   0.11 0.799 −0.05   0.13 0.711 −0.04 0.17 0.831   0.03 0.17 0.886
  PAR T4 → AL Δ T4-T5   0.02   0.14 0.915   0.26   0.16 0.107 −0.21 0.13 0.093   0.36* 0.18 0.050
Proportional Effects
  AL T1 → AL Δ T1-T2   0.33   0.26 0.203   0.26   0.24 0.277   0.12 0.23 0.608   0.39 0.31 0.209
  AL T2 → AL Δ T2-T3   0.33   0.26 0.203   0.26   0.24 0.277   0.12 0.23 0.608   0.39 0.31 0.209
  AL T3 → AL Δ T3-T4   0.33   0.26 0.203   0.26   0.24 0.277   0.12 0.23 0.608   0.39 0.31 0.209
  AL T4 → AL Δ T4-T5   0.33   0.26 0.203   0.26   0.24 0.277   0.12 0.23 0.608   0.39 0.31 0.209
Latent Change Score Mean
  AL Δ T1–T2 44.90*   1.04 0.000 49.23*   0.93 0.000   4.20* 0.08 0.000   4.14* 0.07 0.000
  AL Δ T2–T3 46.67*   0.99 0.000 49.63*   0.99 0.000   4.00* 0.09 0.000   4.17* 0.07 0.000
  AL Δ T3–T4 47.36*   1.08 0.000 50.10*   0.99 0.000   4.07* 0.07 0.000   4.04* 0.07 0.000
  AL Δ T4–T5 48.12*   1.02 0.000 48.60*   1.81 0.000   4.05* 0.08 0.000   4.15* 0.07 0.000
Latent Change Score Variance
  AL Δ T1–T2 84.08* 11.14 0.000 68.11*   9.35 0.000   0.47* 0.08 0.000   0.37* 0.05 0.000
  AL Δ T2–T3 76.19* 10.96 0.000 74.35* 10.82 0.000   0.61* 0.11 0.000   0.41* 0.08 0.000
  AL Δ T3–T4 87.61* 11.98 0.000 72.26* 10.43 0.000   0.40* 0.07 0.000   0.37* 0.05 0.000
  AL Δ T4–T5 78.24* 11.76 0.000 83.44* 11.62 0.000   0.48* 0.07 0.000   0.36* 0.06 0.000

SR social relationship, AL alcohol use, RAC race, ITN income-to-needs ratio, PAR parent–adolescent relationship quality, T1 Time 1 (age 14), T2 Time 2 (age 15); T3 Time 3 (age 16); T4 Time 4 (age 17); T5 Time 5 (age 18). Est. unstandardized parameter estimate, SE standard error.

*

p < 0.05.