Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;407(4):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02520-w

Table 2.

Surgical findings (n=220)

n /median
(%/IQR)
Surgical technique
RAMIE (abd. + tho. rob.) 189 (85.9)
Conversion (tho.) 8 (4.2)
Conversion (abd.) 6 (3.2)
hRAMIE (only tho. rob.) 25 (11.4)
Conversion (tho.) 1 (4.0)
hRAMIE (only abd. rob.) 6 (2.7)
Conversion (abd.) 1 (16.7)
Reasons for hybrid procedure
Approach learning phase 14
Extended lymphadenectomy 4
Adhesions/former surgery 4
Infiltration of adjacent structures 3
Tumor bleeding 2
Others 4
Reasons for conversion
Adhesions 5
Bleeding 4
Situs 2
Technical problems 2
Others 3
Extended l ung resection 7 (3.2)
Wedge 6 (85.7)
Lobe 1 (14.3)
Extended l ymphadenectomy 100 (45.5)
Cervical 1 (1.0)
Mediastinal region 2–4 99 (99.0)
Simultaneous jejunostomy feeding tube 75 (34.1)
Stapler size esophagogastrostomy
25 mm 34 (15.5)
28 mm 81 (37.0)
29 mm 103 (47.0)
33 mm 1 (0.5)
Blood loss [ml] 200 (80–400)
Operative time [min] 425 (335–527)
R status
0 196 (92.9)
1 15 (7.1)
Resected lymph nodes 25 (19–30)

RAMIE robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy, hRAMIE hybrid RAMIE, abd. abdomen, tho. thorax, rob. robotic-assisted, n (%) median (IQR)