Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;13:888511. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.888511

Table 2.

Linear regression analyses: relationship between ePVS and MoCA scores or WMH Volume.

Effect β R 2 P -Value SE 95% CI
Model 1: dependent variable—MoCA (N =105)
Total ePVS −0.352 0.113 <0.001** 0.099 −0.549 −0.156
CS ePVS −0.351 0.118 <0.001** 0.097 −0.543 −0.160
BG ePVS −0.186 0.033 0.070 0.102 −0.388 0.016
HPC ePVS −0.056 0.003 0.561 0.096 −0.246 0.134
MB ePVS −0.073 0.006 0.447 0.096 −0.264 0.117
Model 2: dependent variable—WMH volume (N = 104)
Total ePVS 0.245 0.069 0.010* 0.093 0.060 0.430
CS ePVS 0.206 0.053 0.027* 0.092 0.023 0.388
BG ePVS 0.324 0.118 <0.001** 0.089 0.148 0.500
HPC ePVS 0.016 <0.001 0.860 0.088 −0.159 0.190
MB ePVS −0.138 0.025 0.117 0.087 −0.312 0.035

MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ePVS, enlarged perivascular space; CS, centrum semiovale; BG, basal ganglia; HPC, hippocampus; MB, midbrain; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.

Both Model 1 and Model 2 adjusted for age, gender, years of education, and eTIV.

*

P ≤ 0.05.

**

P ≤ 0.01.