Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;36:18–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.05.013

Table 3.

Animal models for biomimicking artificial periosteum evaluation.

Animal models Species Applications Pros Cons Ref.
Bone defect models Critical sized calvarial defect Rat, mouse Artificial periosteal alone for defect coverage Easy to conduct, high throughout, save time and cost Damage to the brain, hard to represent clinical conditions [123,127]
Femur/tibia bone defect Rabbit, ovine, rat, sheep Bone grafting with artificial periosteum Closer to the clinical practices, biomechanics evaluation Complicated surgical procedures, careful selection of bone grafting [72,[128], [129], [130]]
Bone fracture models Femoral fracture model Rat, rabbit Artificial periosteal alone with fixation Evaluation of osteointegration Complicated surgical procedures [36,131]