Skip to main content
MedComm logoLink to MedComm
. 2022 Jul 14;3(3):e151. doi: 10.1002/mco2.151

The SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (Mpro): Structure, function, and emerging therapies for COVID‐19

Qing Hu 1,2,#, Yuan Xiong 1,#, Guang‐Hao Zhu 1, Ya‐Ni Zhang 1, Yi‐Wen Zhang 2, Ping Huang 2,, Guang‐Bo Ge 1,
PMCID: PMC9283855  PMID: 35845352

Abstract

The main proteases (Mpro), also termed 3‐chymotrypsin‐like proteases (3CLpro), are a class of highly conserved cysteine hydrolases in β‐coronaviruses. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that 3CLpros play an indispensable role in viral replication and have been recognized as key targets for preventing and treating coronavirus‐caused infectious diseases, including COVID‐19. This review is focused on the structural features and biological function of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) main protease Mpro (also known as 3CLpro), as well as recent advances in discovering and developing SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors. To better understand the characteristics of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, the inhibition activities, inhibitory mechanisms, and key structural features of various 3CLpro inhibitors (including marketed drugs, peptidomimetic, and non‐peptidomimetic synthetic compounds, as well as natural compounds and their derivatives) are summarized comprehensively. Meanwhile, the challenges in this field are highlighted, while future directions for designing and developing efficacious 3CLpro inhibitors as novel anti‐coronavirus therapies are also proposed. Collectively, all information and knowledge presented here are very helpful for understanding the structural features and inhibitory mechanisms of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, which offers new insights or inspiration to medicinal chemists for designing and developing more efficacious 3CLpro inhibitors as novel anti‐coronavirus agents.

Keywords: 3‐chymotrypsin‐like protease (3CLpro), broad‐spectrum anti‐coronavirus agents, SARS‐CoV‐2, β‐coronavirus 3CLpro inhibitor


A comprehensive summary of recent advances in SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors (including marketed drugs, peptidomimetic, and non‐peptidomimetic synthetic compounds, as well as natural compounds and their derivatives), including the inhibitory activities, inhibitory mechanisms, and key structural features, provides new insights for designing and developing more efficacious 3CLpro inhibitors as broad‐spectrum anti‐coronavirus agents.

graphic file with name MCO2-3-e151-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are single‐stranded positive‐sense ribonucleic acid (RNA) enveloped viruses with a 5′‐cap and 3′‐poly‐A tail that can be classified into four subgroups: α, β, 𝛾, and δ. The hosts of CoVs are vertebrates that range from human beings to birds, generally causing respiratory and gastrointestinal tract disorders. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 Seven human coronaviruses have emerged, including three fatal β‐CoVs (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus [SARS‐CoV], Middle‐East respiratory syndrome coronavirus [MERS‐CoV], and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS‐CoV‐2]). 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 Among them, SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV belong to the subgenus Sarbecovirus of β‐CoVs according to the latest release of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (https://talk.ictvonline.org/). Particularly, SARS‐CoV‐2, the pathogen for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), has taken millions of lives, generating a huge negative impact on the public. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 To combat this epidemic effectively, scientists have made great efforts in drug repurposing, vaccine development, and novel medication discovery. To date, several effective vaccines that mainly target the viral spike (S) protein can be used for the preliminary prevention of COVID‐19 by eliciting an immune response. 15 , 16 Newly emerging variants (e.g., Delta and Omicron) of SARS‐CoV‐2 have generated high‐frequency mutations in the S protein, including nucleic acid mutations and amino acid mutations, which present potential hazards for the effectiveness of vaccines and mutation‐mediated resistance. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20

In the process of virus multiplication, the main proteases (Mpro, also known as 3CLpro), a class of highly conserved cysteine hydrolases from CoVs, are capable of cleaving polyproteins at multiple sites to yield multiple functional proteins. 21 Considering that 3CLpros play a vital role in CoV replication, especially in the two of the most serious pandemics of the 21st century caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV, these key hydrolases have been validated as promising targets for developing broad‐spectrum anti‐CoV agents. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Because no homolog of 3CLpro has been identified in humans, it is feasible to develop efficacious and specific 3CLpro inhibitors with extremely weak inhibitory effects on human proteases, thereby reducing the side effects caused by 3CLpro inhibitors. As shown in Figure 1, the phylogenetic relationships of 14 kinds of 3CLpros from coronaviruses show that the relatedness of the 3CLpros for SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV are extremely close 27 37 ; thus, most attempts to develop new SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors are based on previously reported SARS‐CoV 3CLpro inhibitor. As an attractive target for combating viral replication and pathogenesis to control various CoVs, 3CLpro has drawn much interest from both academics and industry.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Phylogenetic relationships for 14 reported 3‐chymotrypsin‐like proteases (3CLpros) in Nidovirus. (A) The evolutionary distances (genetic variations) of 3CLpros are presented on branches. (B) Amino acid homologous sequence alignment of 3CLpros

In recent years, multiple drug discovery strategies have been utilized to find or develop a number of 3CLpro inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2, such as drug repurposing, virtual screening coupled with high‐throughput screening (HTS), and structure‐based drug design. 38 , 39 , 40 Moreover, the discovery of active compounds from natural products remains one of the most important sources for developing novel anti‐CoV agents. 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 Therefore, many research groups have devoted their efforts to finding anti‐CoV agents in naturally occurring compounds. 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 To date, a variety of marketed drugs and other structurally diverse synthetic compounds, as well as a number of natural compounds, have been found to be efficacious inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, showing great potential for developing novel broad‐spectrum anti‐CoV agents. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 Thus, this review focuses on the structural features and function of 3CLpro and recent advances in the discovery of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, aiming to provide a SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor library for medicinal chemists to design and develop more efficacious anti‐CoV agents in the future.

2. STRUCTURAL FEATURES AND FUNCTION OF 3CLpro

A total of 432 structures of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro are currently uploaded to the PDB database, containing 54 apoprotein structures and 378 liganded protein structures (Supporting Information). The available structures of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro were crystallized at temperatures ranging from 277 to 300 K and refined at resolutions ranging from 1.2 to 2.98 Å. 3CLpro is approximately 34.21 kDa per monomer (average molecular weight of monomeric deposited models). 3CLpro is matured in a dimeric form, and the individual monomers are enzymatically less active, where the monomers consist of three domains, including domain I, domain II, and domain III. 60 , 61 Among them, domain III is an extra helix domain, whose aggregation initiates the dimerization of 3CLpro. 16 , 22 , 36 , 62 Generally, the monomer of 3CLpro is a transient state that proved to be enzymatically less active, while the dimeric form acts as a functional unit with the highest hydrolytic activity (Table 1). 63 , 64 , 65 The firm binding between the N‐finger and C‐terminus is one of the key conditions for the formation of dimeric 3CLpro, especially the salt bridge between Arg4 and Arg298. 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72

TABLE 1.

Molecular features of 3‐chymotrypsin‐like proteases (3CLpro) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV)

Property SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro SARS‐CoV 3CLpro
Molecular weight (kDa) 34 34
Isoelectric point 6.0 6.2
Optimal pH 7.5 7.0
Length of monomer (residue) 306 306
Mature form Homodimer Homodimer
Catalytic residues His41, Cys145 His41, Cys145

The catalytic site of 3CLpro is located at the intersection of domains I and II, which can be divided into mainly five sub‐pockets, including S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 (Figure 2). 36 , 73 The key facial residues of five sub‐pockets are listed in Table S1, whose dimensional chemical environment matches five specific substrate‐binding positions. 64 , 74 , 75 P1, P2, and P1ʹ positions mainly determine the substrate specificity of 3CLpro, while P4, P3, and P3ʹ boost the recognition and stable binding of substrates. 64 , 76 The Oβ atom of glutamine could bind to the oxyanion hole (residues 143–145) of S1, and then the thiol of Cys145 could attack the C atom of glutamine as a nucleophile. 64 , 77 Therefore, P1 almost always requires glutamine or lactam warhead. 78 , 79 , 80 Notably, only one of the catalytic sites possesses hydrolytic function in the homodimer. 16 , 78 , 81

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(A) The 3D structure of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) 3CLpro (pale green, PDB: 6XHU) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) 3CLpro (slate, PDB: 1UJ1). (B) Three structural domains (domain I: orange, domain II: yellow, domain III: blue) of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro monomer. (C) The surface representation for the catalytic pocket (sub‐pockets: S1–S5) of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. (D) The amino acid residues in the active site of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. (E) The catalytic mechanism of 3CLpro on the hydrolysis of amide substrate

Different from the catalytic triad of 3‐chymotrypsin, the catalytic dyad of 3CLpro is formed by Cys145 and His41. 82 , 83 The zwitter catalytic dyad Cys145–His+41 needs to be activated by energetical water that is maintained by His164 and Asp187. 63 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 Cleavage of the large polyprotein chains by 3CLpro occurs at the glutamine residue in the P1 position of the substrate via a Cys145–His41 dyad, in which the cysteine thiol functions as the nucleophile in the proteolytic process. The cleavage of polyproteins by 3CLpro using a universal nucleophilic‐type reaction mechanism is as follows (Figure 2E). Initially, the Cys145‐thiol on the catalytic dyad is deprotonated with the help of nearby His41, where the anionic sulfur attacks the C‐terminal C atom of the specially recognized Gln as a nucleophile. 88 Then, after spitting the amide bond, the histidine restores the deprotonated form, and the generated thioester is attacked in an identical fashion, with water acting as the nucleophile leading to the release of the hydrolyzed C‐terminal, thus resetting the catalytic dyad. 89 , 90 The mutant experiment proved that the catalytic cysteine is essential to 3CLpro, as replacing cysteine with serine would result in a covalent product–enzyme complex or a covalent Ser145Oγ–Gln306C bond, fatally blocking the self‐cleavage process. 64

As a key cysteine protease, SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro has 12 cysteine residues, but only three of them (Cys85, Cys145, and Cys156) are exposed to solvent. 91 Catalytic Cys145 is the most important cysteine located in the catalytic site. Myricetin can bind to Cys145 in its oxidized form. 92 Ebselen and its derivatives can modify Cys145 by forming a Se–S bond. 93 Peptidomimetic α‐acyloxymethylketone warheads can react with Cys145 through a structure‐based selectivity mechanism. 94 However, few covalent inhibitors have been discovered to be accessible to Cys85 and Cys156. Cys156 is only profiled using N‐ethylmaleimide, a small‐molecule electrophile that engages cysteine side‐chain thiolates by creating a covalent bond. 63 The inconducive spatial environments enclosing Cys85 and Cys156 are speculated to be the cause. Although the bulk of the 3CLpro cysteines is buried inside the protein, several cysteines are tested and predicted to be reactive. Cys22 and Cys44 are two conserved deprotonated cysteines in 3CLpro. Constant‐pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) titration revealed that Cys22 and Cys44 are more nucleophilic than catalytic Cys145. 95 Cys44 is largely inclined to be modified by flavonoids because the pocket encircled Cys44 is compatible with flavonoids, such as baicalein and covalent‐binding myricetin. 95 , 96 Cys300 is proven to be an allosteric site of 3CLpro. 95 Myricetin and colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) can bind to Cys300 of 3CLpro and inhibit 3CLpro as allosteric inhibitors. 96 , 97 Notably, a prominent dissociation of 3CLpro occurs after incubation of CBS with 3CLpro, resulting in degradation of 3CLpro and collapse of the active site. 97

3. SYNTHETIC COMPOUNDS

With the help of the high‐resolution crystal structures of both SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and its homolog SARS‐CoV 3CLpro, a panel of computer‐aided drug design and crystallography‐guided fragment‐based drug discovery approach have been widely used to screen and design novel inhibitors against SARS‐CoV 3CLpro. 98 A majority of synthetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors are designed based on the 3D structure of the active pocket and substrate preferences of the target enzyme, which could be structurally categorized into peptidomimetics and non‐peptidomimetics (small molecules). 40 , 99 Currently, a number of synthetic compounds (including peptidomimetics and non‐peptidomimetics) have been found with strong to extremely potent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, which have aroused significant interest in the pharmaceutical industry to develop more efficacious antiviral drug candidates with satisfying drug‐likeness properties and safety profiles for combating COVID‐19. 100

3.1. Peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors

Peptidomimetics have been widely used for the development of antiviral drugs, offering numerous properties, such as superior efficiency and safety, as well as less accumulation within the body. 101 Thus, a series of peptidomimetic antiviral drugs have been rationally designed for the treatment of COVID‐19. As shown in Figure 3, GC376, a peptidomimetic antiviral protease inhibitor for the treatment of cats infected with feline infectious peritonitis virus, showed strong inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and SARS‐CoV‐2 replication with the half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 26.4 nM and 0.91 μM, respectively. 102 , 103 , 104 Vuong et al. 105 also reported that this drug and its parent GC373 were potent inhibitors of 3CLpro of SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2 with IC50 values in the nanomolar range. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis showed that these inhibitors covalently modified Cys145 to reversibly form a hemithioacetal. Meanwhile, GC376 and compound 4 were found to be covalent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. 106 Furthermore, Dampalla et al. 107 synthesized a series of deuterated derivatives of GC376 and determined the therapeutic efficacy in a lethal mouse model. In the co‐crystal structure of SARS‐CoV 3CLpro, a novel stereocenter formed by compound 2 covalently attached to Cys145 with nearly the same hydrogen bonding interactions as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. As a result of the multiple advantages of introducing deuterium into the drug, the deuterated variants at the R‐site exhibited a significant increase in the anti‐3CLpro and cell‐based assays, as well as improved pharmacokinetics and reduced toxicity. 107 , 108 Moreover, by using the fluorine‐walk approach to explore the binding modes of the F‐substituted phenyl ring, they found that compounds 15b and 15c were the most effective against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, with IC50 values of 0.13 and 0.17 μM, respectively. 109 Compounds 6j and 6h inhibited SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro with significant efficacy, while administration of compound 6j significantly improved survival, reductions in lung virus titers, and lung histopathology throughout the day in a mouse model of MERS‐CoV infection. 80 Several non‐deuterated and deuterated compounds containing a conformationally constrained cyclohexane moiety were synthesized, of which compound 2a/3a displayed high potency in biochemical assays with IC50 values in the submicromolar range. Importantly, the half‐maximal effect concentration (EC50) values of compounds 2a and 3a against SARS‐CoV‐2 in Vero E6 cells were 0.035 and 0.032 μM, respectively. 110 All of the above compounds contain GC376 variants with potent biological activity, making them potential anti‐COVID‐19 candidates.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The chemical structures and half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for representative peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, as well as their half‐maximal effect concentration (EC50) values for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2

A series of novel protease inhibitors with an aldehyde warhead targeting the 3C protease of enterovirus 71 was designed and synthesized, especially compound 18p, which showed potent enzyme inhibitory activity and broad‐spectrum antiviral activity against a group of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses. 111 Notably, compound 18p showed strong replication inhibition against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 = 0.034 μM, EC50 = 0.29 μM), making it a further potential candidate for the treatment of COVID‐19. In particular, calpain inhibitors I, II, and XII were identified as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. 112 , 113 Moreover, five tetrapeptidomimetic anti‐3CLpro inhibitors, similar to the backbone of 13a, were successfully involved in the design of the catalytic dyad histidine residue (His41) of 3CLpro. Among them, TPM16 and TPM19 exhibited nanomolar inhibition and attenuated the cellular viral loads of SARS‐CoV‐2. 114 Compound 15l with novel α‐acyloxymethylketone warhead mimetic compounds was described by Bai et al., 94 which was identified to have potent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and viral replication inhibition in vitro. Moreover, co‐crystallization of 15l with SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro confirmed the formation of covalent adducts. Compound 7 showed inhibition activity against 3CLpro, papain‐like protease (PLpro), and furin protease at IC50 values of 0.45, 0.085, and 0.29 μM, respectively. Moreover, compound 7 has a higher inhibitory effect on the virus and is nontoxic to mammalian cells, making it a powerful dual inhibitory activity against SARS‐CoV‐2. 115 Using a covalent DNA‐encoded library screening platform, Ge et al. 116 found that compound 1e showed potent inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (Table S2).

A small‐molecule compound 5h containing an indole moiety was characterized against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (inhibition constant, Ki  = 17.6 nM) via reversible covalent interactions. Based on Vero E6 cell assays, 5h blocked the infectivity of SARS‐CoV‐2 with an EC50 value of 4.2 μM. 117 , 118 One novel SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor, compound 23R, was highly selective compared to covalent inhibitors. The co‐crystal structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro with 23R reveals a previously unexplored binding site located between the S2 and S4 pockets. 119 Bai et al. 120 described that compound 18b bearing nitrile warheads displays good SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibition activity, which could reduce SARS‐CoV‐2 plaques in Vero E6 host cells (EC50 = 2.2 μM), and showed a better selectivity than the aldehyde warhead peptidomimetics for human cysteine proteases (cathepsins B, S, and L). Seven peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors were identified from the Korea Chemical Bank library. Among these agents, CPK‐M1‐011367‐E05 showed strong anti‐3CLpro activity and anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity. 121

For CoVs to successfully invade the host cell, the S protein of CoVs needs to be cleaved and activated by some host cell proteases, such as furin and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). Cathepsin L is a lysosomal cysteine protease in the host that is closely related to the membrane fusion of SARS‐CoV. 122 A clinical study suggested that cathepsin L level in COVID‐19 patients was positively correlated with disease course and severity. 123 Specifically, the secondary cleavage of the S protein by cathepsin L promotes the cell–cell fusion of SARS‐CoV‐2, indicating that cathepsin L is a promising target for anti‐COVID‐19. 124 Recently, a proteasome inhibitor, MG132, was identified as a dual inhibitor for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and cathepsin L, which could covalently and reversibly bind to Cys145 of 3CLpro. 125 A novel class of self‐masked aldehyde inhibitors for cruzain was developed, in which compound 18 showed extremely potent 3CLpro inhibitory activity (Ki  = 9 nM) and good anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity (EC50 = 5 μM) in A549/angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) cells. 126 Macrocyclic peptides are known for their higher membrane permeability, superior selectivity, and stability, making them a promising privileged structure in drug discovery. Macrocycle 13c has been found to have significant inhibitory activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 = 2.58 μM). 127 Moreover, Johansen‐Leete et al. 128 reported several high‐affinity thioether‐linked cyclic peptide inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, and several inhibitors exhibited in vitro anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity with EC50 values in the low micromolar range. Compound 29 was identified as a dual‐action inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 proteases that inhibits 3CLpro at a micromolar level (IC50 = 1.72 μM) while inhibiting PLpro at a submicromolar level (IC50 = 0.67 μM). 129

As shown in Table S2, a set of submicromolar covalent inhibitors with warheads were screened by Stille et al., 130 and compounds 16a and 14a significantly inhibited the catalytic activity of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. Breidenbach et al. 131 identified and optimized two classes of protease inhibitors (azanitrile and pyridyl esters), of which azanitrile 8 (Ki  = 24 nM), equipped with a unique azanitrile warhead, was an irreversible inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. SDZ224015, a promising clinical caspase‐1 inhibitor, was identified as a SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor (IC50 = 30 nM) and might form an irreversible covalent adduct with the target enzyme. 132 MPI3 and MPI8 displayed high potency against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, with MPI8 showing the best selectivity toward host cathepsin L, reducing the potential toxicity toward host cells and high antiviral potency. 133 , 134 Using chlorofluoroacetamide as a reactive warhead, Yamane et al. 135 have developed an irreversible inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. Among them, the inhibitory activity of (R, R)‐18 against 3CLpro was significantly higher than that of the other isomers.

3.2. Non‐peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors

To meet the urgent requirements for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents, scientists have made great efforts to discover anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents from in‐house compound libraries or commercially available compounds via virtual screening coupled with experimental validation in early studies. The activities of non‐peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors are summarized in Figure 4 and Table S2. For instance, Yang et al. 136 adopted a multiple conformational‐based virtual screening strategy and surface plasmon resonance assay for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors from a protein mimetics library. Six compounds presented inhibitory effects against 3CLpro both in vitro and in HEK293T cells, and Z1759961356 hindered viral replication in Vero E6 cells with an EC50 value of 8.52 μM. Four isoquinolone‐based compounds from a database were reported as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors with IC50 values of approximately 1 μM. 137

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The structures and half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for representative non‐peptidomimetic SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, as well as their half‐maximal effect concentration (EC50) values for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2

In fact, some inhibitors have a potential impact on several 3CLpros due to the high conservation of this protease among CoVs. 138 For example, ML188 inhibited the 3CLpro of SARS‐CoV, SARS‐CoV‐2, and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, making it a promising broad‐spectrum antiviral agent. 74 Moreover, structural optimization based on the reported inhibitor was a feasible strategy to develop SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors. CCF0058981, a novel compound derived from ML300 (SARS‐CoV 3CLpro inhibitor), 139 exerted a nanomolar level of activity (IC50 = 68 nM) against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, as well as superior anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activities in both cytopathic effect inhibition assays (EC50 = 0.497 μM) and plaque reduction assays (EC50 = 0.558 μM). 140 Except for viral proteases, host proteases related to viral infection are also promising targets for fighting COVID‐19. In this context, Elseginy et al. 115 focused on multi‐target inhibitors for fighting SARS‐CoV‐2. They demonstrated that not only compound 13d inhibited 3CLpro and PLpro in SARS‐CoV‐2 but also furin protease in the host. Meanwhile, this compound could significantly inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 (IC50 = 0.11 μM) in vitro.

Perampanel, an antiepileptic drug, showed weak inhibitory activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, while its cloverleaf motif could occupy three sub‐pockets with a high docking score, thus proposing it as a promising skeleton for novel 3CLpro inhibitors. 141 To validate this hypothesis, Zhang et al. 142 put forward a useful strategy to guide the rational design of perampanel‐derived inhibitors, which was a combination of several methodologies, including the free‐energy perturbation calculation, structural analysis, biochemistry assessments, and X‐ray crystallography. Among the 27 analogs, compound 21b exhibited a potent inhibitory effect against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 = 18 nM) but with the greatest cytotoxicity. In particular, the combined use of compound 5 and remdesivir was initially predicted to have a synergistic effect on antiviral activity. To elevate the inhibitory activity and safety, they conducted crystallographic studies for further refinements. 143 In a follow‐up study, this team found that 13 uracilyl‐containing compounds presented strong activity. Among 13 newly designed compounds, compound 19a had potent enzyme inhibitory activities, good anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 effects, good aqueous solubility, and low toxicity, suggesting that it is a promising compound for anti‐COVID‐19. 144 According to the effective pharmacophores, some inhibitors were designed and synthesized to optimize the valuable interactions that could perfectly fit the enzymatic active pockets. Luttens et al. 145 carried out several screening cycles and combinations of promising scaffolds for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors. Compound 19b was optimized as a noncovalent broad‐spectrum 3CLpro inhibitor and showed promising antiviral activity, as well as good metabolic stability and plasma protein binding in humans.

In addition, some synthetic compounds bear at least reactive groups (such as Michael receptors and α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl) that can covalently bind to crucial residuals (e.g., Cys145) of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, giving rise to irreversible inactivation of the target enzyme. 146 Such inhibitors generated long‐lasting and efficient inhibitory effects against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, implying a promising strategy for the development of anti‐COVID‐19 agents. 16 , 147 , 148 Jin et al. 16 screened six inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro from a library of 3CLpro containing over 10,000 compounds, and ebselen and PX‐12 could covalently bind to Cys145 of 3CLpro, and ebselen might also noncovalently bind to 3CLpro simultaneously. Beyond that, ebselen could react with cysteine residues of several viral proteases, such as SARS‐CoV‐2 PLpro and 3Cpro of enterovirus A71 and enterovirus D68, which was suggested as a multi‐target antiviral agent. 149 Some ebselen and ebsulfur derivatives were synthesized as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, and 1i and 2k were proved as potent and covalent inhibitors, with Ki values of 0.031 and 0.078 μM, respectively. 150 , 151

Mitsuya and coworkers have been devoted to developing effective 3CLpro inhibitors for fighting SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2. In particular, they suggested that carbonyl indole could function as a warhead to modify Cys145 of 3CLpro, and several carbonyl‐indole‐containing compounds were identified as covalent inhibitors, such as GRL‐0920. 147 , 148 , 152 , 153 Another compound, GRL‐1720, an inhibitor of SARS‐CoV 3CLpro (IC50 = 30 nM), could also irreversibly inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (K inact = 2.53 min−1, Ki  = 2.15 μM). Meanwhile, this compound could also block the infectivity of SARS‐CoV‐2WK‐521 (SARS‐CoV‐2 JPN/TY/WK‐521 strain) in Vero E6 cells, with an EC50 value of 15 μM and an apparent half‐maximal cytotoxicity concentration (CC50) value more than 100 μM. 117 , 148 Recently, a group of 5‐chloropyridinyl indole carboxylate derivatives was designed for inhibiting SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. Among all tested compounds, 7d was a potent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor (IC50 = 73 nM) that blocked viral infection in vitro (EC50 = 15 μM). The detailed structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis revealed that the 5‐chloropyridinyl ester was crucial for inhibitory activity. On the indole ring, the N‐allyl substituent could significantly improve the activity, while the incorporation of the methyl group at position‐5 and fluorine at position‐6 generated a declining potency. The X‐ray crystal structure of 7b and SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro presented a covalent binding mechanism. 152 Subsequently, compound 9a was identified as a SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor from another series of new 5‐chloropyridinyl ester analogs, with a calculated IC50 value of 160 nM. 153

Recently, the SAR study of a group of benzoisothiazolone‐containing SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro demonstrated that the phenyl group was optimized as the best group at the tail benzene ring, and the acetamide group in the linker was essential to the inhibitory activity. In particular, the crucial benzoisothiazolone that could function as a warhead for covalently binding to Cys145 of 3CLpro should avoid adverse steric hindrance. As shown in Table S2, 16b‐3 was a promising lead compound for novel anti‐COVID‐19 agents. 154 Beyond that, the thiazolidinone derivatives (k3), QUB‐00006‐Int‐07, VS10, and VS12 were promising inhibitors for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. 155 157 Additionally, it has been reported that metal‐based (such as Au, Pt, and Re) coordination compounds could form metal complexes with cysteine proteases via coordinate covalent bonds. 158 160 Karges et al. 91 preliminarily suggested that the [Re(2,2′‐bipyridine) (CO)3]+ fragment could bind to Cys145 of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro with the lowest energy. Then, a series of Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes were synthesized for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor evaluation. Both compounds 34 and 22 formed a metal—Cys145 covalent bond with SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro in the axial position. Preliminary studies indicate that this compound was a selective inhibitor of 3CLpro, which exhibited poor inhibitory effects against several human proteases at 50 μM, including human serine protease dipeptidyl peptidase‐4, aspartate protease β‐secretase 1, and cysteine protease cathepsin B.

4. NATURALLY DERIVED SARS‐COV‐2 3CLpro INHIBITORS

It is well known that natural compounds are still the major sources for the identification of drug lead compounds. 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 Over the past few years, a number of structurally diverse natural products and their derivatives (such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, and quinones) have been found to have anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro effects, and some of them have been identified as covalent 3CLpro inhibitors. 96 , 166 In this review, the reported naturally derived SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, accompanied by their inhibitory effects and inhibitory mechanisms, were well summarized, which well explained the anti‐COVID‐19 effects of some herbal medicines and provided new inspiration to medicinal chemists for designing and developing novel anti‐COVID‐19 agents by targeting 3CLpro.

4.1. Flavonoids and their derivatives

Flavonoids are secondary metabolites that widely exist in edible and medicinal plants and usually comprise several subclasses, such as flavanones, flavones, flavonols, and biflavones. 167 , 168 This class of polyphenol compounds is known for good safety profiles and multiple health benefits, including antioxidative, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, and immunomodulatory effects. 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 Recently, many flavonoids have shown strong inhibitory effects against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, and their inhibitory effects are listed in Figure 5 and Table S3.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The structures and half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for representative naturally derived SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors

Scutellaria baicalensis is a traditional Chinese medicine used for upper respiratory tract infections and possesses wide antiviral activity, including against SARS‐CoV‐2 (EC50 = 0.74 μg/ml). 175 , 176 Recently, some flavonoids in S. baicalensis were reported to be SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, such as baicalein and scutellarein. 177 It is well known that phenolic groups can transform into orthoquinone under oxidizing conditions, which can easily be attacked by nucleophiles (such as thiol). 178 According to a new study, six scutellarein‐methylated derivatives were synthesized as novel 3CLpro inhibitors. 4′‐O‐methylscutellarein was characterized as a potent noncovalent 3CLpro inhibitor (IC50 = 0.40 μM). Further SAR study demonstrated that the replacement of hydroxyl groups at the A‐ring was indispensable, and hydrophobicity of the B‐ring might be beneficial to inhibitory activity. 179 Xiong et al. 96 identified myricetin, dihydromyricetin, and iso‐dihydromyricetin as covalent inhibitors for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, whose orthoquinone form could modify the key cysteines near the catalytic site (Cys145) or dimeric interface (Cys300) of the target enzyme. Meanwhile, Su et al. 180 also demonstrated that myricetin could covalently bind to Cys145 of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro by using crystal structure analysis of the complex. To gain more ideal SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, several analogs were designed based on myricetin, among which 7‐O‐methyl‐dihydropopulins showed the highest inhibitory effect with an IC50 value of 0.26 μM. Moreover, this study revealed that the pyrogallol group could be used as an alternative electrophile warhead to develop covalent inhibitors for 3CLpro. In contrast, another study revealed that baicalein was a noncovalent inhibitor that could act as a “shield” to prevent the substrate from entering the catalytic pocket. 181 Even though these compounds bear a pyrogallol group, the different conformations of myricetin and baicalein in the 3CLpro catalytic site generate different action modes.

Ugonin J is a flavonoid isolated from the Rhizome of Helminthostachys zeylanica, which has an ethyl‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐6‐methylenecyclohexyl) moiety at the C‐6 position and possessed a potent inhibitory effect on SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 = 0.94 μM). Furthermore, the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity and anti‐inflammatory activity of this inhibitor have been proven in vitro, suggesting that ugonin J could be used as a leading compound to fight COVID‐19. 182 Quercetin has a broad spectrum of antiviral activities (including poliovirus type 1, herpes simplex virus type 1 [HSV‐1], HSV‐2, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza A subtypes). 39 Regarding anti‐3CLpro activity, quercetin exhibited a better inhibitory effect against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro than SARS‐CoV 3CLpro. 166 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 Recently, Mangiavacchi et al. 187 synthesized and evaluated a series of compounds based on the skeletons of quercetin and chrysin. The SAR analysis suggested that the phenylselenyl moiety at the C‐8 position was highly effective, while the double substitution resulted in a drop in the activity. 2‐(3,4‐Dihydroxyphenyl)‐3,5,7‐trihydroxy‐8‐(p‐tolylselanyl)‐4H‐chromen‐4‐one was a strong (IC50 = 11 μM) and reversible (Ki = 3.8 μM) 3CLpro inhibitor, presenting a safe and effective inhibition activity (IC50 = 8 μM) against the replication of SARS‐CoV‐2 in a Vero cell model. The major tea catechins, including epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate, (‐)‐epicatechin 3‐O‐caffeoate, as well as etc‐pyrrolidinone C and D, possessed strong inhibitory effects toward 3CLpro. 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 In addition, some flavonoids, such as kaempferol, luteolin, genkwanin, and isorhamnetin, displayed various degrees of inhibitory activities toward 3CLpro. 192 , 193

However, the bioavailability of naturally occurring flavonoids is generally poor, which are easily glycosylated by UDP‐glucuronosyltransferases in vivo. 194 The metabolites (glycosyl flavonoids) have better solubility, stability, and bioavailability properties than their aglycones. 193 , 195 , 196 Some molecular docking and simulation studies found that glycosyl flavonoids calculated a high‐affinity score for binding to 3CLpro. 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 By using experimental (spectroscopy and calorimetry) and simulation techniques (docking and molecular dynamics simulations), Rizzuti et al. 202 revealed that rutin was a promising inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. 201 , 202 However, most studies found that the introduction of glycosides on flavonoids would weaken the inhibitory effects on 3CLpro. For example, baicalin, narcissoside, and kaempferol‐3‐O‐gentiobioside presented relatively poorer inhibitory effects than their aglycones. 181 , 203 Further SAR studies demonstrated that glycosylation on the 7‐hydroxy of quercetin could be allowed, but the acetoxylation of the glycosyl was adverse. 204

Biflavones are a class of compounds with a dimer of flavonoid structure, some of which have been validated as 3CLpro inhibitors. 205 Xiong et al. 166 found that Ginkgo biloba leaves showed strong inhibitory activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro via a scale screening of herbal extracts, while 20 major constituents (including five biflavones) isolated from this herb were collected for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibition assays. Further kinetic analyses and molecular docking suggested that sciadopitysin could strongly inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro in a mixed manner, with a Ki value of 2.96 μM. Other biflavones, including ginkgetin, isoginkgetin, amentoflavone, and bilobetin, could also dose dependently inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, with IC50 values ranging from 2.33 to 11.19 μM.

4.2. Phenolic acids

Phenolic acids are a group of secondary metabolites and bioactive compounds produced by plants. 206 , 207 Xiong et al. 166 pointed out that four ginkgolic acids (GAs) from Folium ginkgo showed relatively potent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitory activity (IC50 < 5 μM). Further inhibition kinetic studies and docking simulations clearly showed that GAs C15:0 and C17:1 strongly inhibited SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro in a mixed manner (Figure 5 and Table S4). Moreover, GAs (C15:0 and C15:1) were identified as dual inhibitors targeting both 3CLpro and PLpro of SARS‐CoV‐2 at nontoxic concentrations by Chen et al. 208 However, allergenic GAs are severely restricted in commercially available G. biloba products. 209 There is growing evidence that GA has broad antiviral effects by interfering with viral replication. 210 , 211 Additionally, Nguyen et al. 212 reported the inhibitory activity of different phenolic acids from black garlic on SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, including gallic acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, and chlorogenic acid. The above results suggest that these phenolic acids are worth exploring as potential new therapeutics for COVID‐19.

4.3. Tannins

Tannins displayed potent inhibitory effects against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and SARS‐CoV 3CLpro with IC50 values at the micromolar level. Wang et al. 213 found tannic acid to be a potent inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and TMPRSS2, with an IC50 of 13.4 μM for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. Consistently, tannic acid could also target the mechanisms governing virus entry. 213 As early as 2005, Chen et al. 215 demonstrated a significant inhibitory effect of tannic acid on SARS‐CoV 3CLpro (IC50 = 3 μM). 190 , 214 , 215 Therefore, the above results suggest that tannic acid has a high potential for the development of anti‐coronavirus therapeutics as a broad‐spectrum inhibitor. As shown in Table S5, 1,2,3,4,6‐pentagalloylglucose is a hydrolysable tannin that has been reported to inhibit a variety of viruses. 216 In terms of anti‐3CLpro activity, Chiou et al. 188 found that 1,2,3,4,6‐pentagalloylglucose inhibited 50% of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and SARS‐CoV 3CLpro at 3.66 and 6.89 μM, respectively.

Additionally, Park et al. 217 evaluated the biological activity of nine phlorotannins, dieckol (IC50 = 2.7 μM), which possesses two eckol groups linked through a diphenyl ether and showed the most potent SARS‐CoV 3CLpro inhibitory activity. Up to now, Yan et al. 218 developed a novel screening method combining fluorescence polarization technology with a biotin–avidin system and identified dieckol as a new competitive inhibitor against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro with an IC50 value of 4.5 μM. Recently, Du et al. 219 demonstrated that chebulagic acid and punicalagin, which have been recognized as broad‐spectrum antiviral agents, inhibited SARS‐CoV‐2 plaque formation in a dose‐dependent manner, indicating that they exhibit antiviral activity in vitro. Furthermore, chebulagic acid and punicalagin exhibited reversible inhibitory effects against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro via noncompetitive modes.

4.4. Quinones and their derivatives

Quinones are a class of cyclohexadienedione‐containing or cyclohexadiene dimethylene‐containing organic compounds that are usually divided into benzoquinones, naphthoquinones, phenanthraquinones, and anthraquinones. 220 , 221 As shown in Figure 5 and Table S6, quinones and their derivatives provide several promising leading compounds for the development of anti‐COVID‐19 agents by targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. It has been reported that tanshinones isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza are inhibitors of SARS‐CoV cysteine proteases (including 3CLpro and PLpro). 222 Recently, tanshinone I was shown to inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 at the cellular level with an EC50 value of 2.26 μM. These results substantiate the use of tanshinone derivatives as antiviral agents. In the meantime, tanshinone I and tanshinone IIA were identified as SARS‐CoV‐2 PLpro inhibitors. 223 , 224 , 225 Jin et al. 16 found that shikonin exhibits potent inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro activity with an IC50 of 15.75 μM. Moreover, shikonin presented a noncovalent binding configuration with multiple interactions at the S1–S4 subsites of the binding pocket and occupied the space of one water molecule of 3CLpro. 56

It is well known that the specific chemical structure of quinone confers oxidative and electrophilic properties. 220 , 226 , 227 , 228 Wang et al. 229 screened vitamin K3 as a time‐dependent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor (IC50 = 4.78 μM at 60 min preincubation) from Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved drug library. Based on this finding, a set of vitamin K3 analogs was collected for SAR analysis. The results showed that 5,8‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinone could strongly and time dependently inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and covalently bind to the target enzyme. However, the high electrophilicity of quinones may lead to cytotoxicity. 230 To discover safe and effective quinone‐derived inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, Cui and Jia 231 designed a set of juglone‐like compounds by using a simple skeleton. The results suggested that the interaction between the acetyl substituent on the quinone ring and the methyl group attached to the phenolic hydroxyl group of juglone was crucial for the inhibitory effects. Further cytotoxicity and antiviral assays demonstrated that 2‐acetyl‐8‐methoxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinone exhibited a low cytotoxic profile and good anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 in Vero E6 cells (EC50 = 4.55 μM). This study demonstrated the possibility of quinone being developed as a safe antiviral agent. Recently, four compounds were screened to inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro from a compound library, with IC50 values ranging from 0.41 to 66 μM. Further studies suggested that compound 382 was a reversible SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor, while compound 415 might form a covalent bond with Cys145 of 3CLpro. 232 Similarly, aloesin was identified as a SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitor from a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)‐based THS assessment. 233

4.5. Others

Beyond the abovementioned classes of natural compounds, other compounds derived from natural compounds were also found to have SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibition activity, such as alkaloids, terpenoids, and theaflavins, as well as phenylethanol glycosides. 181 , 214 , 234 , 235 The compound information alongside their SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitory effects are shown in Figure 5 and Table S7. Some isatin derivatives exhibited strong inhibition effects against 3CLpro, such as 1‐(naphthalen‐2‐ylmethyl)‐2,3‐dioxoindoline‐5‐carboxamide, which was a promising compound for developing broad‐spectrum anti‐coronavirus agents. 236 , 237 Zhong et al. 238 identified that oridonin displayed effective inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro activity and bound to 3CLpro via covalent bonding, while inhibiting SARS‐CoV‐2 in Vero E6 cells with an IC50 of 4.95 μM, above indicating that oridonin prevented SARS‐CoV‐2 replication by inhibiting 3CLpro. 239 Most recently, by pharmacophore‐oriented semisynthesis combining the pharmacophore of oridonin and a novel scaffold (maoelactone A), Zhou et al. 240 created a series of compounds with anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity, where compound 70 inhibited the replication of SARS‐CoV‐2‐affected Vero E6 cells with low EC50 values.

One newly reported study indicated that six phenylethanol glycosides (including forsythoside A, B, E, H, I, and isoforsythiaside) isolated from Forsythia suspensa were strong inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 values range from 2.88 to 10.17 μM), which contributed to the excellent anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity of Shuanghuanglian preparation (a traditional proprietary Chinese medicine). 181 Some other compounds, including polydatin, resveratrol, and all‐trans retinoic acid, generated inhibitory effects against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. 241 , 242 A series of 9,10‐dihydrophenanthrene derivatives were synthesized to discover strong SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors. 243 The preliminary SAR suggested that a suitable bulkier group at the C‐8 position displayed good inhibitory activities. Among all derivatives, compound C1 could dose dependently inhibit the target enzyme in a mixed manner, with an IC50 value of 1.55 μM and a Ki value of 6.09 μM. Further study suggested that this inhibitor had the potential to be a novel orally administered and broad‐spectrum antiviral agent. 243

5. ANTI‐COV CLINICAL CANDIDATES TARGETING SARS‐COV‐2 3CLpro

5.1. SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors under clinical trials

In view of the ongoing mutation of SARS‐CoV‐2 (such as Omicron), clinical studies of some antibody drugs have stagnated. 17 , 244 Small‐molecule anti‐CoV drugs, however, have great potential to combat new CoV variants, as the convenience and flexibility of oral administration, along with the large production capacity, provide good conditions to achieve a global fight against COVID‐19. 245 The following are some clinical advances in the development of small‐molecule drugs targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (Figure 6 and Table 2). 25 , 78 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

The structures and half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for representative clinical candidates SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, as well as their half‐maximal effect concentration (EC50) values for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2

TABLE 2.

Representative clinical candidates for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors

Drug Company Delivery States IC50 (nM) EC50 (nM) CT.GOV ID/Ref.
PF‐07321332 (Paxlovir) Pfizer Oral Proved 3.11 74.5 NCT04960202 258
s‐217622 Shionogi Oral Phase III 13 370 NCT05305547 260
PF‐07304814 Pfizer IV Phase I 0.27 760 NCT05050682
FB2001/11a (DC402234) Frontier IV Phase I 53 530 NCT05197179
EDP‐235 Enanta Oral Phase I 5.8 5.1 NCT05246878
SIM0417 (SSD8432) Simcere Oral Phase II NCT05373433
PBI‐0451 Pardes Oral Phase I NCT05011812
13b University of Lübeck Inhaled Preclinical 670 4–5 μM (Calu‐3 cell) 25
ALG‐097111 Aligos Preclinical 7 200 (A549 cell) 251
MPI8 Sorrento Preclinical 105 30 134
ASC11 Ascletis Oral Preclinical 263
EDDC‐2214 Everest Oral Preclinical 264
RAY003 Zhongsheng Oral Preclinical 179

Abbreviations: EC50, half‐maximal effect concentration; IC50, half‐maximal inhibitory concentration.

Recently, paxlovid, a novel orally available agent combining a 3CLpro inhibitor (PF‐07321332) with ritonavir, has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with moderate or severe COVID‐19. 247 , 248 , 256 , 257 , 258 PF‐07321332 exhibited potent inhibition against 3CLpro from various CoV types known to infect humans, as well as significant SARS‐CoV‐2 antiviral activity in Vero E6 cells (EC50 = 74.5 nM). In the meantime, PF‐07321332 (100 μM) showed no inhibitory activity against caspase‐2, cathepsin B/D/L, chymotrypsin, elastase, thrombin, and HIV‐1 protease, indicating a high selectivity for CoV proteases. A phase II/III clinical trial of PF‐07321332/ritonavir (ID: NCT04960202) assessed its safety and effectiveness for treating COVID‐19 in adults who did not require hospitalization. The data showed that the patients treated with this drug experienced an 89% reduction in the risk of hospitalization or death, which was highly effective. More recently, the clinical trial results from the treatment of hospitalized patients with paxlovid oral agents during the Omicron BA.2 outbreak in Hong Kong showed significantly lower disease progression composite outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.33, p < 0.001), significantly lower all‐cause mortality (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001), and faster reduction in viral load (HR = 1.25, p = 0.015). 259 Additionally, the novel phosphate prodrug PF‐07304814, which can be rapidly converted in vivo to the active moiety of PF‐00835231, has broad‐spectrum inhibitory activity against a panel of 3CLpro and potent antiviral activity in vivo. 253 , 254 Furthermore, clinical trials in phase Ib of PF‐07304814 (ID: NCT05050682) evaluated its safety, metabolism, and pharmacokinetics in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

After virtual screening and SAR analysis of the hit compounds, S‐217622 displayed potent inhibition activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and exhibited in vitro antiviral activity against a range of CoVs, including more aggressive SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. 249 , 250 , 252 The clinical trial of S‐217622 (ID: NCT05305547) was a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study with Japanese adults, which evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of this drug once daily for 5 days. New data indicated that the proportion of patients with positive viral titers was decreased by approximately 90% versus placebo on the fourth day of treatment. 260 Dai et al. 78 based on the crystal structure of 3CLpro designed and synthesized peptidomimetic compounds 11a and 11b, which possess potent antiviral activity with EC50 values of 530 and 720 nM against SARS‐CoV‐2, respectively. Of these, FB2001 (11a) was an anti‐CoV candidate for reaching clinical trials. In addition, FB2001 (ID: NCT05197179) demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability in the first human clinical trial conducted in the United States, for which its pharmacokinetics and safety will subsequently be evaluated in healthy Chinese populations.

At the 2022 Annual Meeting of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Enanta noted that EDP‐235 potently inhibited the SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro protease and effectively blocked the replication of SARS‐CoV‐2 in multiple cellular models. In addition, EDP‐235 was shown to have good in vivo penetration into a variety of target tissues. 246 Furthermore, EDP‐235 (ID: NCT05246878) was evaluated in the first in‐human phase I study in healthy volunteers for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. PBI‐0451 (ID: NCT05011812), administered twice daily as a stand‐alone agent, has shown good tolerability in the ongoing phase I clinical trial, at >20‐fold single‐ and >14‐fold multiple‐total daily dosage. 261 SSD8432 (ID: NCT05373433) was the first oral SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro drug approved for clinical trials in China, and its phase II clinical trial evaluated its efficacy and safety in combination with ritonavir in asymptomatic infections or mild/general safety studies in adult subjects with COVID‐19. The role of an α‐ketoamide inhibitor was explored, and it was found that compound 13b could inhibit 3CLpro from SARS‐CoV‐2, SARS‐CoV, and MERS‐CoV, with IC50 values of 0.67, 0.90, and 0.58 μM, respectively. 25 The inhibitory effect of compound 13b on human Calu‐3 cells infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 (EC50 = 4–5 μM). Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic profile of the optimized inhibitor revealed a clear pulmonary propensity and was suitable for administration via the inhalation route.

In brief, 3CLpro inhibitor therapy is an attractive and effective pharmacotherapy for treating CoV‐associated infectious diseases, owing to its broad spectrum of antiviral activities and ability to prevent the posttranslational processing of SARS‐CoV‐2 polypeptides as well as reduce the risk of mutation‐mediated resistance to drug therapy. 262

5.2. Old drugs as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors

It is well known that the development of a novel drug generally takes a long time. Comprehensive clinical studies of approved drugs promote drug repurposing a shortcut for the discovery of safe and effective anti‐COVID‐19 agents, which can bypass animal safety studies and directly enter clinical phase II or III to ensure supply. Many approved drugs have been identified as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors by using computational and experimental studies, such as teicoplanin, dipyridamole, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine, 265 , 266 and their inhibitory effects are listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

The current indications of clinical drugs and their inhibitory activities against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro

Compound Pharmacological activities IC50/Ki (μM) Ref.
Teicoplanin Antibacteria 1.61 265 , 273
Dipyridamole Antiplatelet 0.04 265
Hydroxychloroquine Antimalarial and anti‐inflammatory 0.36
Chloroquine Antimalarial and anti‐inflammatory 0.56
Manidipine Anti‐hypertension 4.81 141
Lercanidipine Anti‐hypertension 16.2
Efonidipine Anti‐hypertension 38.5
Bedaquiline Antituberculosis 18.7
Ethacrynic acid Hydragogue for treating chronic heart failure 1.11 267 , 274
Naproxen Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug for treating mild‐to‐moderate pain and arthritis 3.45 267 , 275
Allopurino Treat gout, hyperuricemia, and kidney stones 3.77 267 , 276
Butenafine hydrochloride Antifungal 5.40 267 , 277
Raloxifene hydrochloride Prevent osteoporosis 5.61 267 , 278
Tranylcypromine hydrochloride Antidepressant and antianxiety 8.64 267 , 279
Saquinavir mesylate Anti‐HIV 9.92 267 , 280
Triptorelin acetate Anti‐prostate cancer 10.12 267 , 281
Goserelin acetate Anti‐prostate and breast cancer 12.02 267 , 282
Rocuronium bromide Muscle relaxant 17.47 267 , 283
Bisacodyl Treat constipation 17.51 267 , 284
Armodafini Promotes wakefulness 17.87 267 , 285
Clobetasol propionate Treat skin conditions 18.09 267 , 286
Sirolimus (Rapamycin) An immunosuppressant drug for allografting rejection therapy 22.30 267 , 287
Colistin sulfate Antibacteria 23.20 267 , 273
Cetirizine Relieve allergy 25.58 267 , 288
Bexarotene Treat cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma 26.49 267 , 289
Cefpodoxime proxetil Antibacteria 32.43 267 , 290
Clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride Antibacteria 33.21 267 , 291
Oxaliplatin Anti‐colorectal cancer 47.31 267 , 292
Masitinib Inhibit tyrosine kinase 2.5/2.6 268 , 293
Colloidal bismuth subcitrate Anti‐Helicobacter pylori, anti‐duodenal ulcer 0.93 94 , 97
Merbromin Antibacteria 2.7 270 , 295
Tolcapone Treat Parkinson's disease 7.9 271
Levothyroxine Thyroid hormone 19.2
Manidipine‐2HCl Anti‐hypertension 10.4
Disulfiram Alcohol aversion 9.35 16 , 296
Carmofur Antitumors 1.82 16 , 297
Tideglusib Anti‐Alzheimer disease 1.55 16 , 298
Z‐FA‐FMK Inhibit cysteine proteases irreversibly 26.3 141 , 272
Boceprevir Anti‐HCV protease 5.40 272 , 299

Abbreviations: HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IC50, half‐maximal inhibitory concentration; Ki , inhibition constant.

According to the predicted poses and docking scores of complexes, 17 agents were predicted as potential inhibitors for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, five of which could inhibit the hydrolysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro‐catalyzed fluorescent peptide substrate. 141 Chiou et al. 267 identified 20 drugs as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors in silico and in vitro. Among them, ethacrynic acid was the strongest inhibitor, with an IC50 value of 1.11 μM, while the anti‐inflammatory and immunosuppressive activities of naproxen (IC50 = 3.45 μM) might be advantageous in COVID‐19 treatment. A large‐scale screening campaign was conducted for the anti‐OC43 (one β‐CoV) effects in vitro. Twenty drugs were screened out for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 infection assays in A549 cells and enzyme measurements in green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐expressing 293T cells. Masitinib competitively inhibited SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro, both in vitro and in live cells. Moreover, this agent also significantly reduced the SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load in mice and inflammatory cytokines in the lungs. The clinical combination of masitinib and isoquercetin suggested that masitinib was a promising agent for the early treatment of COVID‐19. 268

CBS is a metallodrug usually used for duodenal ulcer treatment. A newly reported study found that CBS remarkably inhibited SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro activity in vitro and in cellulo. Rather than the active residual (Cys145), CBS bound to the allosteric site (Cys300) and caused dimeric enzyme to dissociate into monomers. 95 Additionally, CBS exhibited potent anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity both in the cells and golden Syrian hamster model, which also inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 helicase by displacing the zinc(II) ions in helicase by bismuth(III) ions. All these findings suggested that CBS was a promising agent for anti‐COVID‐19. 269 Recently, merbromin was identified as a mixed inhibitor against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. 270 Manidipine‐2HCl served as a dual inhibitor for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro (IC50 = 7.90 μM) and PLpro (IC50 = 14.20 μM), showing effective anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity with an EC50 value of 14.5 μM. 271 However, due to the rigorous experimental conditions of cell‐based assays, the majority of reported SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors were restricted to in vitro effects. In a new study, a novel cell‐based luciferase complementation reporter assay was reported for the discovery of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors, which could readily differentiate false positives caused by cytotoxicity. The method was further applied to the validation of cell‐based inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity for 22 reported SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors. 272

6. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

The ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic has created a serious threat to human health and life safety worldwide, thus, there is an urgent medical need to find more effective therapeutic strategies for combating COVID‐19. 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 Among all validated targets for fighting CoVs, including SARS‐CoV‐2, the highly conserved 3D structure of 3CLpro plays an essential role in CoV replication, and no known human protease possesses a similar cleavage specificity, making 3CLpro an ideal target for developing clinically effective anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents. 21 , 60 , 109 , 304 , 305 It is worth noting that a wide range of compounds have been found to have strong to moderate SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitory effects in the past few years. To better understand the structural features of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors and their inhibitory mechanisms, this study systematically summarized the reported structurally diverse SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors (including marketed drugs and other synthetic compounds, herbal constituents, and their derivatives), as well as their inhibition potentials and mechanisms of action. The information and knowledge presented here offer a basic reference for medicinal chemists to design and develop more effective 3CLpro inhibitors as novel anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents.

Targeting the key amino acids surrounding the catalytic site to block the hydrolytic process of 3CLpro is one of the practical strategies for developing efficacious 3CLpro inhibitors. 30 , 31 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 133 According to the different inhibitory mechanisms, all reported SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors can be divided into reversible inhibitors and covalent inhibitors. Most reversible inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro exhibit micromolar activity, and these agents have difficulty blocking the hydrolytic activity of 3CLpro in vivo. In contrast, covalent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors bear at least one of the warheads (such as pyrogallol groups, quinones, or Michael receptors), which are capable of inhibiting viral replication by forming a covalent bond with the thiol of key cysteines on the catalytic site and dimeric interface of 3CLpro (such as Cys145, Cys300, and Cys44). Compared to reversible inhibitors, these covalent inhibitors tend to show stronger and prolonged activities, which motivates medicinal chemists to develop more potent covalent inhibitors against 3CLpro. Although a number of synthetic compounds and natural compounds have been identified as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro covalent inhibitors, most of them show poor bioavailability, poor metabolic stability, and poor aqueous solubility. In the future, the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro potency and drug‐likeness properties should be improved simultaneously to overcome these limitations. 306

Another alternative potential strategy for designing SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors is to block the formation of 3CLpro dimers, the active form of this key enzyme. 307 , 308 Considering that the hydrolytic activity of 3CLpro relies on its dimeric form, inhibitors targeting protein self‐association that disturb dimerization formation and stabilization by destroying the key interactions essential for 3CLpro are also highly desirable. Such agents can prevent virus replication and proliferation in the invisible battlefield against this enigmatic and rapidly evolving virus. It has been reported that some known SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors can bind to either the catalytic site or the allosteric sites (especially the dimer interface) via different binding modes, including competitive, noncompetitive, and mixed manners. Theoretically, it is more likely to block SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro by using combinations of various 3CLpro inhibitors that target different ligand‐binding sites, which may display synergistic 3CLpro inhibitory effects via different inhibitory modes (such as occupying the catalytic domain and blocking dimerization formation).

In addition to 3CLpro inhibition activity, many synthetic agents and herbal constituents (including flavonoids, alkaloids, and polyphenols) have been found to have strong inhibitory or modulatory effects on other key targets for treating CoVs (such as PLpro, RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase [RdRp], and TMPRSS2). 125 , 173 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 It is well known that herbal medicines contain numerous compounds, while various constituents may interact with different anti‐CoV targets or different ligand‐binding sites. 313 , 314 In these cases, the synergetic effects of multiple components from herbal medicines should be carefully investigated, which may partially explain the excellent anti‐COVID‐19 activities of some marketed Chinese medicines. 314 Furthermore, cathepsin L (a lysosomal cysteine protease in the host that cleaves furin‐induced SARS‐CoV‐2 S protein into smaller fragments and activates its membrane fusion) has also been identified as a key target participating in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. 112 , 123 , 315 , 316 Thus, it is highly recommended to develop more efficacious dual inhibitors by targeting both viral protease and host cathepsin L to combat COVID‐19. 125

COVID‐19 is a complex, multi‐organ, and heterogeneous illness, and severe disease cases are frequently accompanied by a hypercoagulable inflammatory state. 317 , 318 Thus, an ideal anti‐COVID‐19 medication should have multiple pharmacological activities, such as anti‐inflammatory, anticoagulant, anti‐CoV, and immunomodulatory activities. Numerous studies have confirmed that several marketed Chinese medicines display significant anti‐inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in vivo, achieving good protective effects on the organs as well as inhibiting viral replication. 319 , 320 For example, Qingfei Paidu Decoction, a widely used Chinese medicine prescription for the treatment of COVID‐19 in China, has been found to have multiple pharmacological activities, including anti‐inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antiviral effects. 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 In the future, to obtain better therapeutic effects, the clinically used Chinese medicine prescriptions for treating COVID‐19 can be used in combination with marketed anti‐CoV agents for clinical observations in a reasonable dose range, 301 which may be beneficial to COVID‐19 patients with pre‐existing diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and pulmonary disease).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Q.H., Y.X., and GH.Z. drafted this manuscript and prepared the figures. YN.Z. and YW.Z. participated in the collection of the related literature. P.H. and GB.G. supervised the review process. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICS STATEMENT

No ethical approval is required.

Supporting information

Supporting information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82141203, 81922070, 81973286), Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ZYYCXTD‐D‐202004), Three‐year Action Plan for Shanghai TCM Development and Inheritance Program (ZY(2021‐2023)‐0401), The Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province (LGF22H280012), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plans (20S21901500 and 20S21900900), Shanghai Science and Technology Committee, Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (2022495401), Hangzhou Medical College Basic Research Program (KYQN202124), Chinese Medicine Research Program of Zhejiang Province (2020ZZ003 and 2021ZZ001), “10000 Talents Plan” of Zhejiang Province (2020R52029), and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of New Heath Talents to Yiwen Zhang.

Hu Q, Xiong Y, Zhu G‐H, et al. The SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (Mpro): Structure, function, and emerging therapies for COVID‐19. MedComm. 2022;3:e151. 10.1002/mco2.151

Contributor Information

Ping Huang, Email: huangping@hmc.edu.cn.

Guang‐Bo Ge, Email: geguangbo@dicp.ac.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTS

All data are freely available from the corresponding author upon request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Artika IM, Dewantari AK, Wiyatno A. Molecular biology of coronaviruses: current knowledge. Heliyon. 2020;6(8):e04743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gorbalenya AE, Enjuanes L, Ziebuhr J, et al. Nidovirales: evolving the largest RNA virus genome. Virus Res. 2006;117(1):17‐37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mirza MU, Froeyen M. Structural elucidation of SARS‐CoV‐2 vital proteins: computational methods reveal potential drug candidates against main protease, Nsp12 polymerase and Nsp13 helicase. J Pharm Anal. 2020;10(4):320‐328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus‐EMC. Nature. 2013;495(7440):251‐254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang Y, Grunewald M, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an updated overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2203:1‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zuniga S, Sola I, Alonso S, et al. Sequence motifs involved in the regulation of discontinuous coronavirus subgenomic RNA synthesis. J Virol. 2004;78(2):980‐994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus‐infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199‐1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mitsuya H, Kokudo N. Sustaining containment of COVID‐19: global sharing for pandemic response. Glob Health Med. 2020;2(2):53‐55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tu H, Tu S, Gao S, et al. Current epidemiological and clinical features of COVID‐19; a global perspective from China. J Infect. 2020;81(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727‐733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Alderson MR, Arkwright PD, Bai X, et al. Surveillance and control of meningococcal disease in the COVID‐19 era: a global meningococcal initiative review. J Infect. 2022;84(3):289‐296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Li X, Geng M, Peng Y, et al. Molecular immune pathogenesis and diagnosis of COVID‐19. J Pharm Anal. 2020;10(2):102‐108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ramos‐Guzman CA, Ruiz‐Pernia JJ, Tunon I. Multiscale simulations of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibition with aldehyde derivatives. Role of protein and inhibitor conformational changes in the reaction mechanism. ACS Catal. 2021;11(7):4157‐4168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Xie X, Hu L, Xue H, et al. Prognosis and treatment of complications associated with COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Mater Med. 2022;1(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gurung AB, Ali MA, Lee J, et al. Structural and functional insights into the major mutations of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike RBD and its interaction with human ACE2 receptor. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34(2):101773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, et al. Structure of M(pro) from SARS‐CoV‐2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020;582(7811):289‐293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Berkhout B, Herrera‐Carrillo E. SARS‐CoV‐2 evolution: on the sudden appearance of the Omicron variant. J Virol. 2022;96(7):e0009022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. del Rio C, Omer SB, Malani PN. Winter of Omicron—the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic. JAMA. 2022;327(4):319‐320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Li Q, Kang C. Progress in developing inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease. Microorganisms. 2020;8(8):1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tian D, Sun YH, Zhou JM, et al. The global epidemic of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants and their mutational immune escape. J Med Virol. 2022;94(3):847‐857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Qiao J, Li YS, Zeng R, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro) inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model. Science. 2021;371(6536):1374‐1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Anand K, Palm GJ, Mesters JR, et al. Structure of coronavirus main proteinase reveals combination of a chymotrypsin fold with an extra alpha‐helical domain. EMBO J. 2002;21(13):3213‐3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. He J, Hu L, Huang X, et al. Potential of coronavirus 3C‐like protease inhibitors for the development of new anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 drugs: insights from structures of protease and inhibitors. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(2):106055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pillaiyar T, Manickam M, Namasivayam V, et al. An overview of severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) 3CL protease inhibitors: peptidomimetics and small molecule chemotherapy. J Med Chem. 2016;59(14):6595‐6628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, et al. Crystal structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved alpha‐ketoamide inhibitors. Science. 2020;368(6489):409‐412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ziebuhr J, Snijder EJ, Gorbalenya AE. Virus‐encoded proteinases and proteolytic processing in the Nidovirales. J Gen Virol. 2000;81(Pt 4):853‐879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cui W, Cui S, Chen C, et al. The crystal structure of main protease from mouse hepatitis virus A59 in complex with an inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;511(4):794‐799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Galasiti Kankanamalage AC, Kim Y, Damalanka VC, et al. Structure‐guided design of potent and permeable inhibitors of MERS coronavirus 3CL protease that utilize a piperidine moiety as a novel design element. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;150:334‐346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kanitz M, Blanck S, Heine A, et al. Structural basis for catalysis and substrate specificity of a 3C‐like cysteine protease from a mosquito mesonivirus. Virology. 2019;533:21‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lee C‐C, Kuo C‐J, Ko T‐P, et al. Structural basis of inhibition specificities of 3C and 3C‐like proteases by zinc‐coordinating and peptidomimetic compounds. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(12):7646‐7655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. St John SE, Tomar S, Stauffer SR, et al. Targeting zoonotic viruses: structure‐based inhibition of the 3C‐like protease from bat coronavirus HKU4 – the likely reservoir host to the human coronavirus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23(17):6036‐6048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Tian X, Lu G, Gao F, et al. Structure and cleavage specificity of the chymotrypsin‐like serine protease (3CLSP/nsp4) of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). J Mol Biol. 2009;392(4):977‐993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang F, Chen C, Liu X, et al. Crystal structure of feline infectious peritonitis virus main protease in complex with synergetic dual inhibitors. J Virol. 2016;90(4):1910‐1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang F, Chen C, Yang K, et al. Michael acceptor‐based peptidomimetic inhibitor of main protease from porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. J Med Chem. 2017;60(7):3212‐3216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Xue X, Yu H, Yang H, et al. Structures of two coronavirus main proteases: implications for substrate binding and antiviral drug design. J Virol. 2008;82(5):2515‐2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yang H, Yang M, Ding Y, et al. The crystal structures of severe acute respiratory syndrome virus main protease and its complex with an inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(23):13190‐13195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zhao Q, Li S, Xue F, et al. Structure of the main protease from a global infectious human coronavirus, HCoV‐HKU1. J Virol. 2008;82(17):8647‐8655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Shagufta Ahmad I. The race to treat COVID‐19: potential therapeutic agents for the prevention and treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;213:113157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu C, Liu Y, Yang Y, et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS‐CoV‐2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(5):766‐788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu Y, Liang C, Xin L, et al. The development of coronavirus 3C‐Like protease (3CL(pro)) inhibitors from 2010 to 2020. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;206:112711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Boozari M, Hosseinzadeh H. Natural products for COVID‐19 prevention and treatment regarding to previous coronavirus infections and novel studies. Phytother Res. 2021;35(2):864‐876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gowrishankar S, Muthumanickam S, Kamaladevi A, et al. Promising phytochemicals of traditional Indian herbal steam inhalation therapy to combat COVID‐19—an in silico study. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021;148:111966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Luo L, Jiang J, Wang C, et al. Analysis on herbal medicines utilized for treatment of COVID‐19. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(7):1192‐1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Meng L, Hong G. Application of traditional Chinese medicine in treating COVID‐19. Chin Med Cult. 2021;4(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mirzaie A, Halaji M, Dehkordi FS, et al. A narrative literature review on traditional medicine options for treatment of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2020;40:101214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ren W, Liang P, Ma Y, et al. Research progress of traditional Chinese medicine against COVID‐19. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137:111310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Tassakka A, Sumule O, Massi MN, et al. Potential bioactive compounds as SARS‐CoV‐2 inhibitors from extracts of the marine red alga Halymenia durvillei (Rhodophyta)—a computational study. Arab J Chem. 2021;14(11):103393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Huang K, Zhang P, Zhang Z, et al. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the treatment of COVID‐19 and other viral infections: efficacies and mechanisms. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;225:107843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lyu M, Fan G, Xiao G, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in COVID‐19. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(11):3337‐3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ni L, Chen L, Huang X, et al. Combating COVID‐19 with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in China. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(7):1149‐1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ren JL, Zhang AH, Wang XJ. Traditional Chinese medicine for COVID‐19 treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2020;155:104743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Yang Y, Islam MS, Wang J, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of patients infected with 2019‐new coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2): a review and perspective. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1708‐1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dogan K, Erol E, Didem Orhan M, et al. Instant determination of the artemisinin from various Artemisia annua L. extracts by LC–ESI–MS/MS and their in‐silico modelling and in vitro antiviral activity studies against SARS‐CoV‐2. Phytochem Anal. 2022;33(2):303‐319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Fayyazi N, Mostashari‐Rad T, Ghasemi JB, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation, 3D‐pharmacophore and scaffold hopping analysis in the design of multi‐target drugs to inhibit potential targets of COVID‐19. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021:1‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Guijarro‐Real C, Plazas M, Rodriguez‐Burruezo A, et al. Potential in vitro inhibition of selected plant extracts against SARS‐CoV‐2 chymotripsin‐like protease (3CL(Pro)) activity. Foods. 2021;10(7):1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Li J, Zhou X, Zhang Y, et al. Crystal structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease in complex with the natural product inhibitor shikonin illuminates a unique binding mode. Sci Bull. 2021;66(7):661‐663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mandal A, Jha AK, Hazra B. Plant products as inhibitors of coronavirus 3CL protease. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:583387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Rizzuti B, Ceballos‐Laita L, Ortega‐Alarcon D, et al. Sub‐micromolar inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro by natural compounds. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(9):892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Tahir Ul Qamar M, Alqahtani SM, Alamri MA, et al. Structural basis of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) and anti‐COVID‐19 drug discovery from medicinal plants. J Pharm Anal. 2020;10(4):313‐319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Abe K, Kabe Y, Uchiyama S, et al. Pro108Ser mutation of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) reduces the enzyme activity and ameliorates the clinical severity of COVID‐19. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Denesyuk AI, Permyakov EA, Johnson MS, et al. Structural and functional significance of the amino acid differences Val35Thr, Ser46Ala, Asn65Ser, and Ala94Ser in 3C‐like proteinases from SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;193(Pt B):2113‐2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Feng J, Li D, Zhang J, et al. Crystal structure of SARS‐CoV 3C‐like protease with baicalein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;611:190‐194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Kneller DW, Phillips G, O'Neill HM, et al. Room‐temperature X‐ray crystallography reveals the oxidation and reactivity of cysteine residues in SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL M(pro): insights into enzyme mechanism and drug design. IUCrJ. 2020;7(Pt 6):1028‐1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Noske GD, Nakamura AM, Gawriljuk VO, et al. A crystallographic snapshot of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease maturation process. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(18):167118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pablos I, Machado Y, de Jesus HCR, et al. Mechanistic insights into COVID‐19 by global analysis of the SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) substrate degradome. Cell Rep. 2021;37(4):109892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Barrila J, Gabelli SB, Bacha U, et al. Mutation of Asn28 disrupts the dimerization and enzymatic activity of SARS 3CL(pro). Biochemistry. 2010;49(20):4308‐4317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Chen H, Wei P, Huang C, et al. Only one protomer is active in the dimer of SARS 3C‐like proteinase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(20):13894‐13898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Chou CY, Chang HC, Hsu WC, et al. Quaternary structure of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus main protease. Biochemistry. 2004;43(47):14958‐14970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Hsu MF, Kuo CJ, Chang KT, et al. Mechanism of the maturation process of SARS‐CoV 3CL protease. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(35):31257‐31266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Kidera A, Moritsugu K, Ekimoto T, et al. Allosteric regulation of 3CL protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV observed in the crystal structure ensemble. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(24):167324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Tomar S, Johnston ML, St John SE, et al. Ligand‐induced dimerization of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus nsp5 protease (3CLpro): implications for nsp5 regulation and the development of antivirals. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(32):19403‐19422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wei P, Fan K, Chen H, et al. The N‐terminal octapeptide acts as a dimerization inhibitor of SARS coronavirus 3C‐like proteinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;339(3):865‐872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Akbulut E. Investigation of changes in protein stability and substrate affinity of 3CL‐protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 caused by mutations. Genet Mol Biol. 2022;45(2):e20210404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Lockbaum GJ, Reyes AC, Lee JM, et al. Crystal structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease in complex with the non‐covalent inhibitor ML188. Viruses. 2021;13(2):174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Douangamath A, Fearon D, Gehrtz P, et al. Crystallographic and electrophilic fragment screening of the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Greasley SE, Noell S, Plotnikova O, et al. Structural basis for the in vitro efficacy of nirmatrelvir against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(6):101972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Mishra B, Ballaney P, Saha G, et al. An in silico discovery of potential 3CL protease inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 based upon inactivation of the cysteine 145‐Histidine 41 catalytic dyad. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022:1‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Dai W, Zhang B, Jiang XM, et al. Structure‐based design of antiviral drug candidates targeting the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease. Science. 2020;368(6497):1331‐1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Lu IL, Mahindroo N, Liang PH, et al. Structure‐based drug design and structural biology study of novel nonpeptide inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus main protease. J Med Chem. 2006;49(17):5154‐5161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Rathnayake AD, Zheng J, Kim Y, et al. 3C‐like protease inhibitors block coronavirus replication in vitro and improve survival in MERS‐CoV‐infected mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(557):eabc5332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Lee CC, Kuo CJ, Hsu MF, et al. Structural basis of mercury‐ and zinc‐conjugated complexes as SARS‐CoV 3C‐like protease inhibitors. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(28):5454‐5458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Webber SE, Okano K, Little TL, et al. Tripeptide aldehyde inhibitors of human rhinovirus 3C protease: design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and cocrystal structure solution of P1 glutamine isosteric replacements. J Med Chem. 1998;41(15):2786‐2805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Chen S, Zhang J, Hu T, et al. Residues on the dimer interface of SARS coronavirus 3C‐like protease: dimer stability characterization and enzyme catalytic activity analysis. J Biochem. 2008;143(4):525‐536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Needle D, Lountos GT, Waugh DS. Structures of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3C‐like protease reveal insights into substrate specificity. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2015;71(Pt 5):1102‐1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Shi J, Song J. The catalysis of the SARS 3C‐like protease is under extensive regulation by its extra domain. FEBS J. 2006;273(5):1035‐1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Shi J, Wei Z, Song J. Dissection study on the severe acute respiratory syndrome 3C‐like protease reveals the critical role of the extra domain in dimerization of the enzyme: defining the extra domain as a new target for design of highly specific protease inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(23):24765‐24773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Yin J, Niu C, Cherney MM, et al. A mechanistic view of enzyme inhibition and peptide hydrolysis in the active site of the SARS‐CoV 3C‐like peptidase. J Mol Biol. 2007;371(4):1060‐1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Kneller DW, Zhang Q, Coates L, et al. Michaelis‐like complex of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease visualized by room‐temperature X‐ray crystallography. IUCrJ. 2021;8(Pt 6):973‐979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Achutha AS, Pushpa VL, Suchitra S. Theoretical insights into the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity of chloroquine and its analogs and in silico screening of main protease inhibitors. J Proteome Res. 2020;19(11):4706‐4717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Xiong M, Su H, Zhao W, et al. What coronavirus 3C‐like protease tells us: from structure, substrate selectivity, to inhibitor design. Med Res Rev. 2021;41(4):1965‐1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Karges J, Kalaj M, Gembicky M, et al. Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes as coordinate covalent inhibitors for the SARS‐CoV‐2 main cysteine protease. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(19):10716‐10723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Kuzikov M, Costanzi E, Reinshagen J, et al. Identification of inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL‐pro enzymatic activity using a small molecule in vitro repurposing screen. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2021;4(3):1096‐1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Amporndanai K, Meng X, Shang W, et al. Inhibition mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease by ebselen and its derivatives. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Bai B, Belovodskiy A, Hena M, et al. Peptidomimetic alpha‐acyloxymethylketone warheads with six‐membered lactam P1 glutamine mimic: SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibition, coronavirus antiviral activity, and in vitro biological stability. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2905‐2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Verma N, Henderson JA, Shen J. Proton‐coupled conformational activation of SARS coronavirus main proteases and opportunity for designing small‐molecule broad‐spectrum targeted covalent inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(52):21883‐21890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Xiong Y, Zhu GH, Zhang YN, et al. Flavonoids in Ampelopsis grossedentata as covalent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro): inhibition potentials, covalent binding sites and inhibitory mechanisms. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:976‐987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Tao X, Zhang L, Du L, et al. Allosteric inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease by colloidal bismuth subcitrate. Chem Sci. 2021;12(42):14098‐14102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Ullrich S, Nitsche C. The SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease as drug target. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2020;30(17):127377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Citarella A, Scala A, Piperno A, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro): a potential target for peptidomimetics and small‐molecule inhibitors. Biomolecules. 2021;11(4):607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Mengist HM, Mekonnen D, Mohammed A, et al. Potency, safety, and pharmacokinetic profiles of potential inhibitors targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:630500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Gentilucci L, Tolomelli A, Squassabia F. Peptides and peptidomimetics in medicine, surgery and biotechnology. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(20):2449‐2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Kim Y, Lovell S, Tiew KC, et al. Broad‐spectrum antivirals against 3C or 3C‐like proteases of picornaviruses, noroviruses, and coronaviruses. J Virol. 2012;86(21):11754‐11762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Hung HC, Ke YY, Huang SY, et al. Discovery of M protease inhibitors encoded by SARS‐CoV‐2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(9):e00872‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Caceres CJ, Cardenas‐Garcia S, Carnaccini S, et al. Efficacy of GC‐376 against SARS‐CoV‐2 virus infection in the K18 hACE2 transgenic mouse model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Vuong W, Khan MB, Fischer C, et al. Feline coronavirus drug inhibits the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 and blocks virus replication. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Iketani S, Forouhar F, Liu H, et al. Author correction: lead compounds for the development of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Dampalla CS, Zheng J, Perera KD, et al. Postinfection treatment with a protease inhibitor increases survival of mice with a fatal SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(29):e2101555118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Gant TG. Using deuterium in drug discovery: leaving the label in the drug. J Med Chem. 2014;57(9):3595‐3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Dampalla CS, Rathnayake AD, Perera KD, et al. Structure‐guided design of potent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease: structural, biochemical, and cell‐based studies. J Med Chem. 2021;64(24):17846‐17865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Dampalla CS, Kim Y, Bickmeier N, et al. Structure‐guided design of conformationally constrained cyclohexane inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 3CL protease. J Med Chem. 2021;64(14):10047‐10058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Dai W, Jochmans D, Xie H, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of peptidomimetic aldehydes as broad‐spectrum inhibitors against enterovirus and SARS‐CoV‐2. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2794‐2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Ma C, Sacco MD, Hurst B, et al. Boceprevir, GC‐376, and calpain inhibitors II, XII inhibit SARS‐CoV‐2 viral replication by targeting the viral main protease. Cell Res. 2020;30(8):678‐692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Milligan JC, Zeisner TU, Papageorgiou G, et al. Identifying SARS‐CoV‐2 antiviral compounds by screening for small molecule inhibitors of Nsp5 main protease. Biochem J. 2021;478(13):2499‐2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Wang Y, Xu B, Ma S, et al. Discovery of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(Pro) peptidomimetic inhibitors through the catalytic dyad histidine‐specific protein–ligand interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Elseginy SA, Fayed B, Hamdy R, et al. Promising anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 drugs by effective dual targeting against the viral and host proteases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021;43:128099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Ge R, Shen Z, Yin J, et al. Discovery of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease covalent inhibitors from a DNA‐encoded library selection. SLAS Discov. 2022;27(2):79‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Hattori SI, Higashi‐Kuwata N, Hayashi H, et al. A small molecule compound with an indole moiety inhibits the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 and blocks virus replication. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Konno S, Kobayashi K, Senda M, et al. 3CL protease inhibitors with an electrophilic arylketone moiety as anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2926‐2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Kitamura N, Sacco MD, Ma C, et al. Expedited approach toward the rational design of noncovalent SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2848‐2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Bai B, Arutyunova E, Khan MB, et al. Peptidomimetic nitrile warheads as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitors. RSC Med Chem. 2021;12(10):1722‐1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Lee JY, Kuo CJ, Shin JS, et al. Identification of non‐covalent 3C‐like protease inhibitors against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 via virtual screening of a Korean compound library. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021;42:128067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Simmons G, Gosalia DN, Rennekamp AJ, et al. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(33):11876‐11881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Gomes CP, Fernandes DE, Casimiro F, et al. Cathepsin L in COVID‐19: from pharmacological evidences to genetics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:589505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS‐CoV‐2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(21):11727‐11734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Costanzi E, Kuzikov M, Esposito F, et al. Structural and biochemical analysis of the dual inhibition of MG‐132 against SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (Mpro/3CLpro) and human cathepsin‐L. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Li L, Chenna BC, Yang KS, et al. Self‐masked aldehyde inhibitors: a novel strategy for inhibiting cysteine proteases. J Med Chem. 2021;64(15):11267‐11287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Al‐Wahaibi LH, Mostafa A, Mostafa YA, et al. Discovery of novel oxazole‐based macrocycles as anti‐coronaviral agents targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease. Bioorg Chem. 2021;116:105363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Johansen‐Leete J, Ullrich S, Fry SE, et al. Antiviral cyclic peptides targeting the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2. Chem Sci. 2022;13(13):3826‐3836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Di Sarno V, Lauro G, Musella S, et al. Identification of a dual acting SARS‐CoV‐2 proteases inhibitor through in silico design and step‐by‐step biological characterization. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;226:113863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Stille JK, Tjutrins J, Wang G, et al. Design, synthesis and in vitro evaluation of novel SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) covalent inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;229:114046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Breidenbach J, Lemke C, Pillaiyar T, et al. Targeting the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2: from the establishment of high throughput screening to the design of tailored inhibitors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(18):10423‐10429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Redhead MA, Owen CD, Brewitz L, et al. Bispecific repurposed medicines targeting the viral and immunological arms of COVID‐19. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Yang KS, Ma XR, Ma Y, et al. A quick route to multiple highly potent SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors. ChemMedChem. 2021;16(6):942‐948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Ma XR, Alugubelli YR, Ma Y, et al. MPI8 is potent against SARS‐CoV‐2 by inhibiting dually and selectively the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease and the host cathepsin L. ChemMedChem. 2022;17(1):e202100456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Yamane D, Onitsuka S, Re S, et al. Selective covalent targeting of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease by enantiopure chlorofluoroacetamide. Chem Sci. 2022;13(10):3027‐3034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Yang J, Lin X, Xing N, et al. Structure‐based discovery of novel nonpeptide inhibitors targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro). J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61(8):3917‐3926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Glaser J, Sedova A, Galanie S, et al. Hit expansion of a noncovalent SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitor. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022;5(4):255‐265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Chen CC, Yu X, Kuo CJ, et al. Overview of antiviral drug candidates targeting coronaviral 3C‐like main proteases. FEBS J. 2021;288(17):5089‐5121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Turlington M, Chun A, Tomar S, et al. Discovery of N‐(benzo[1,2,3]triazol‐1‐yl)‐N‐(benzyl)acetamido)phenyl) carboxamides as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) 3CLpro inhibitors: identification of ML300 and noncovalent nanomolar inhibitors with an induced‐fit binding. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23(22):6172‐6177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Han SH, Goins CM, Arya T, et al. Structure‐based optimization of ML300‐derived, noncovalent inhibitors targeting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3CL protease (SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro)). J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2880‐2904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Ghahremanpour MM, Tirado‐Rives J, Deshmukh M, et al. Identification of 14 known drugs as inhibitors of the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020;11(12):2526‐2533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Zhang CH, Stone EA, Deshmukh M, et al. Potent noncovalent inhibitors of the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 from molecular sculpting of the drug perampanel guided by free energy perturbation calculations. ACS Cent Sci. 2021;7(3):467‐475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Deshmukh MG, Ippolito JA, Zhang CH, et al. Structure‐guided design of a perampanel‐derived pharmacophore targeting the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease. Structure. 2021;29(8):823‐833.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Zhang CH, Spasov KA, Reilly RA, et al. Optimization of triarylpyridinone inhibitors of the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 to low‐nanomolar antiviral potency. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2021;12(8):1325‐1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Luttens A, Gullberg H, Abdurakhmanov E, et al. Ultralarge virtual screening identifies SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors with broad‐spectrum activity against coronaviruses. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(7):2905‐2920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Ramos‐Guzman CA, Ruiz‐Pernia JJ, Tunon I. Inhibition mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease with ketone‐based inhibitors unveiled by multiscale simulations: insights for improved designs. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(49):25933‐25941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Hattori SI, Higshi‐Kuwata N, Raghavaiah J, et al. GRL‐0920, an indole chloropyridinyl ester, completely blocks SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. mBio. 2020;11(4):e01833‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Ghosh AK, Gong G, Grum‐Tokars V, et al. Design, synthesis and antiviral efficacy of a series of potent chloropyridyl ester‐derived SARS‐CoV 3CLpro inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18(20):5684‐5688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Ma C, Hu Y, Townsend JA, et al. Ebselen, disulfiram, carmofur, PX‐12, tideglusib, and shikonin are nonspecific promiscuous SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020;3(6):1265‐1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Qiao Z, Wei N, Jin L, et al. The Mpro structure‐based modifications of ebselen derivatives for improved antiviral activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. Bioorg Chem. 2021;117:105455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Sun LY, Chen C, Su J, et al. Ebsulfur and Ebselen as highly potent scaffolds for the development of potential SARS‐CoV‐2 antivirals. Bioorg Chem. 2021;112:104889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Ghosh AK, Raghavaiah J, Shahabi D, et al. Indole chloropyridinyl ester‐derived SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors: enzyme inhibition, antiviral efficacy, structure–activity relationship, and X‐ray structural studies. J Med Chem. 2021;64(19):14702‐14714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Ghosh AK, Shahabi D, Yadav M, et al. Chloropyridinyl esters of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents and related derivatives as potent SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitors. Molecules. 2021;26(19):5782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Chen W, Feng B, Han S, et al. Discovery of highly potent SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro) inhibitors based on benzoisothiazolone scaffold. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2022;58:128526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Petrou A, Zagaliotis P, Theodoroula NF, et al. Thiazole/thiadiazole/benzothiazole based thiazolidin‐4‐one derivatives as potential inhibitors of main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2. Molecules. 2022;27(7):2180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.El Khoury L, Jing Z, Cuzzolin A, et al. Computationally driven discovery of SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro) inhibitors: from design to experimental validation. Chem Sci. 2022;13(13):3674‐3687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Guo S, Xie H, Lei Y, et al. Discovery of novel inhibitors against main protease (Mpro) of SARS‐CoV‐2 via virtual screening and biochemical evaluation. Bioorg Chem. 2021;110:104767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Fricker SP, Mosi RM, Cameron BR, et al. Metal compounds for the treatment of parasitic diseases. J Inorg Biochem. 2008;102(10):1839‐1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Fricker SP. Cysteine proteases as targets for metal‐based drugs. Metallomics. 2010;2(6):366‐377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Karges J, Cohen SM. Metal complexes as antiviral agents for SARS‐CoV‐2. ChemBioChem. 2021;22(16):2600‐2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Qin XY, Hou XD, Zhu GH, et al. Discovery and characterization of the naturally, occurring inhibitors against human pancreatic lipase in Ampelopsis grossedentata . Front Nutr. 2022;9:844195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Huo PC, Hu Q, Shu S, et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel chalcone‐like compounds as potent and reversible pancreatic lipase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2021;29:115853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Li C‐Y, Wang H‐N, Zhu G‐H, et al. Discovery and characterization of naturally occurring chalcones as potent inhibitors of bile salt hydrolases. Acta Mater Med. 2022;1(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Hou XD, Guan XQ, Cao YF, et al. Inhibition of pancreatic lipase by the constituents in St. John's Wort: in vitro and in silico investigations. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;145:620‐633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Song YQ, Guan XQ, Weng ZM, et al. Discovery of a highly specific and efficacious inhibitor of human carboxylesterase 2 by large‐scale screening. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;137:261‐269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Xiong Y, Zhu GH, Wang HN, et al. Discovery of naturally occurring inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) from Ginkgo biloba leaves via large‐scale screening. Fitoterapia. 2021;152:104909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Shen N, Wang T, Gan Q, et al. Plant flavonoids: classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022;383:132531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Ververidis F, Trantas E, Douglas C, et al. Biotechnology of flavonoids and other phenylpropanoid‐derived natural products. Part I: chemical diversity, impacts on plant biology and human health. Biotechnol J. 2007;2(10):1214‐1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. D'Arcy MS. A review of biologically active flavonoids as inducers of autophagy and apoptosis in neoplastic cells and as cytoprotective agents in non‐neoplastic cells. Cell Biol Int. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Fraga CG, Croft KD, Kennedy DO, et al. The effects of polyphenols and other bioactives on human health. Food Funct. 2019;10(2):514‐528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Zaragoza C, Villaescusa L, Monserrat J, et al. Potential therapeutic anti‐inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of dihydroflavones, flavones, and flavonols. Molecules. 2020;25(4):1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Shaito A, Thuan DTB, Phu HT, et al. Herbal medicine for cardiovascular diseases: efficacy, mechanisms, and safety. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Mouffouk C, Mouffouk S, Mouffouk S, et al. Flavonols as potential antiviral drugs targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 proteases (3CL(pro) and PL(pro)), spike protein, RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and angiotensin‐converting enzyme II receptor (ACE2). Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;891:173759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Liskova A, Samec M, Koklesova L, et al. Flavonoids against the SARS‐CoV‐2 induced inflammatory storm. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;138:111430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Song JW, Long JY, Xie L, et al. Applications, phytochemistry, pharmacological effects, pharmacokinetics, toxicity of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. and its probably potential therapeutic effects on COVID‐19: a review. Chin Med. 2020;15:102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Li K, Liang Y, Cheng A, et al. Antiviral properties of Baicalin: a concise review. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2021;31(4):408‐419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Liu H, Ye F, Sun Q, et al. Scutellaria baicalensis extract and baicalein inhibit replication of SARS‐CoV‐2 and its 3C‐like protease in vitro. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2021;36(1):497‐503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Bolton JL, Dunlap TL, Dietz BM. Formation and biological targets of botanical o‐quinones. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;120:700‐707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Wu Q, Yan S, Wang Y, et al. Discovery of 4'‐O‐methylscutellarein as a potent SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;604:76‐82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Su H, Yao S, Zhao W, et al. Identification of pyrogallol as a warhead in design of covalent inhibitors for the SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Su HX, Yao S, Zhao WF, et al. Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activities in vitro of Shuanghuanglian preparations and bioactive ingredients. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(9):1167‐1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Chiou WC, Lu HF, Hsu NY, et al. Ugonin J acts as a SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease inhibitor and exhibits anti‐inflammatory properties. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:720018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Park JY, Yuk HJ, Ryu HW, et al. Evaluation of polyphenols from Broussonetia papyrifera as coronavirus protease inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2017;32(1):504‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Ryu YB, Jeong HJ, Kim JH, et al. Biflavonoids from Torreya nucifera displaying SARS‐CoV 3CL(pro) inhibition. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(22):7940‐7947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Abian O, Ortega‐Alarcon D, Jimenez‐Alesanco A, et al. Structural stability of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro and identification of quercetin as an inhibitor by experimental screening. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:1693‐1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Saakre M, Mathew D, Ravisankar V. Perspectives on plant flavonoid quercetin‐based drugs for novel SARS‐CoV‐2. Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2021;10(1):21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Mangiavacchi F, Botwina P, Menichetti E, et al. Seleno‐functionalization of quercetin improves the non‐covalent inhibition of M(pro) and its antiviral activity in cells against SARS‐CoV‐2. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Chiou WC, Chen JC, Chen YT, et al. The inhibitory effects of PGG and EGCG against the SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;591:130‐136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Du A, Zheng R, Disoma C, et al. Epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate, an active ingredient of Traditional Chinese Medicines, inhibits the 3CLpro activity of SARS‐CoV‐2. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;176:1‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Nguyen TT, Woo HJ, Kang HK, et al. Flavonoid‐mediated inhibition of SARS coronavirus 3C‐like protease expressed in Pichia pastoris . Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34(5):831‐838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Liu SY, Wang W, Ke JP, et al. Discovery of Camellia sinensis catechins as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitors through molecular docking, intra and extra cellular assays. Phytomedicine. 2022;96:153853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Park J, Park R, Jang M, et al. Therapeutic potential of EGCG, a green tea polyphenol, for treatment of coronavirus diseases. Life. 2021;11(3):197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Cianciosi D, Forbes‐Hernandez TY, Regolo L, et al. The reciprocal interaction between polyphenols and other dietary compounds: impact on bioavailability, antioxidant capacity and other physico‐chemical and nutritional parameters. Food Chem. 2022;375:131904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Le Roy J, Huss B, Creach A, et al. Glycosylation is a major regulator of phenylpropanoid availability and biological activity in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Plaza M, Pozzo T, Liu J, et al. Substituent effects on in vitro antioxidizing properties, stability, and solubility in flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(15):3321‐3333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Sun W, Liang L, Meng X, et al. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a flavonoid 3‐o‐glycosyltransferase responsible for anthocyanins and flavonols biosynthesis in Freesia hybrida. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Cherrak SA, Merzouk H, Mokhtari‐Soulimane N. Potential bioactive glycosylated flavonoids as SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors: a molecular docking and simulation studies. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Jo S, Kim S, Shin DH, et al. Inhibition of SARS‐CoV 3CL protease by flavonoids. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2020;35(1):145‐151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. da Silva FMA, da Silva KPA, de Oliveira LPM, et al. Flavonoid glycosides and their putative human metabolites as potential inhibitors of the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (Mpro) and RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2020;115:e200207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Godinho PIC, Soengas RG, Silva VLM. Therapeutic potential of glycosyl flavonoids as anti‐coronaviral agents. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(6):546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Refaat H, Mady FM, Sarhan HA, et al. Optimization and evaluation of propolis liposomes as a promising therapeutic approach for COVID‐19. Int J Pharm. 2021;592:120028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Rizzuti B, Grande F, Conforti F, et al. Rutin is a low micromolar inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease 3CLpro: implications for drug design of quercetin analogs. Biomedicines. 2021;9(4):375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Liao Q, Chen Z, Tao Y, et al. An integrated method for optimized identification of effective natural inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Chen L, Li J, Luo C, et al. Binding interaction of quercetin‐3‐beta‐galactoside and its synthetic derivatives with SARS‐CoV 3CL(pro): structure–activity relationship studies reveal salient pharmacophore features. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14(24):8295‐8306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Menezes J, Campos VR. Natural biflavonoids as potential therapeutic agents against microbial diseases. Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Heleno SA, Martins A, Queiroz MJ, et al. Bioactivity of phenolic acids: metabolites versus parent compounds: a review. Food Chem. 2015;173:501‐513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Kumar N, Goel N. Phenolic acids: natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications. Biotechnol Rep. 2019;24:e00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Chen Z, Cui Q, Cooper L, et al. Ginkgolic acid and anacardic acid are specific covalent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 cysteine proteases. Cell Biosci. 2021;11(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Yao Q‐Q, Li L, Xu M‐C, et al. The metabolism and hepatotoxicity of ginkgolic acid (17:1) in vitro. Chin J Natural Med. 2018;16(11):829‐837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Borenstein R, Hanson BA, Markosyan RM, et al. Ginkgolic acid inhibits fusion of enveloped viruses. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Lu JM, Yan S, Jamaluddin S, et al. Ginkgolic acid inhibits HIV protease activity and HIV infection in vitro. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(8):BR293‐BR298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Nguyen TTH, Jung JH, Kim MK, et al. The inhibitory effects of plant derivate polyphenols on the main protease of SARS coronavirus 2 and their structure–activity relationship. Molecules. 2021;26(7):1924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Wang S‐C, Chen Y , Wang Y‐C, et al. Tannic acid suppresses SARS‐CoV‐2 as a dual inhibitor of the viral main protease and the cellular TMPRSS2 protease. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(12):4538‐4546. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Jang M, Park YI, Cha YE, et al. Tea polyphenols EGCG and theaflavin inhibit the activity of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL‐protease in vitro. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:5630838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Chen CN, Lin CP, Huang KK, et al. Inhibition of SARS‐CoV 3C‐like protease activity by theaflavin‐3,3'‐digallate (TF3). Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005;2(2):209‐215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Torres‐León C, Ventura‐Sobrevilla J, Serna‐Cock L, et al. Pentagalloylglucose (PGG): a valuable phenolic compound with functional properties. J Funct Foods. 2017;37:176‐189. [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Park JY, Kim JH, Kwon JM, et al. Dieckol, a SARS‐CoV 3CL(pro) inhibitor, isolated from the edible brown algae Ecklonia cava . Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21(13):3730‐3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Yan G, Li D, Lin Y, et al. Development of a simple and miniaturized sandwich‐like fluorescence polarization assay for rapid screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors. Cell Biosci. 2021;11(1):199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Du R, Cooper L, Chen Z, et al. Discovery of chebulagic acid and punicalagin as novel allosteric inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro). Antiviral Res. 2021;190:105075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Monks TJ, Jones DC. The metabolism and toxicity of quinones, quinonimines, quinone methides, and quinone‐thioethers. Curr Drug Metab. 2002;3(4):425‐438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Ali K, Mishra P, Kumar A, et al. Reactivity vs. selectivity of quinone methides: synthesis of pharmaceutically important molecules, toxicity and biological applications. Chem Commun. 2022;58(42):6160‐6175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Park JY, Kim JH, Kim YM, et al. Tanshinones as selective and slow‐binding inhibitors for SARS‐CoV cysteine proteases. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20(19):5928‐5935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Zhao Y, Du X, Duan Y, et al. High‐throughput screening identifies established drugs as SARS‐CoV‐2 PLpro inhibitors. Protein Cell. 2021;12(11):877‐888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Ma C, Wang J. Validation and invalidation of SARS‐CoV‐2 papain‐like protease inhibitors. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022;5(2):102‐109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Lim CT, Tan KW, Wu M, et al. Identifying SARS‐CoV‐2 antiviral compounds by screening for small molecule inhibitors of Nsp3 papain‐like protease. Biochem J. 2021;478(13):2517‐2531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Elgawish MS, Kishikawa N, Helal MA, et al. Molecular modeling and spectroscopic study of quinone–protein adducts: insight into toxicity, selectivity, and reversibility. Toxicol Res. 2015;4(4):843‐847. [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Su C, Liu Z, Wang Y, et al. The electrophilic character of quinones is essential for the suppression of Bach1. Toxicology. 2017;387:17‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. O'Brien PJ. Molecular mechanisms of quinone cytotoxicity. Chem Biol Interact. 1991;1(80):1‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Wang R, Hu Q, Wang H, et al. Identification of vitamin K3 and its analogues as covalent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro). Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;183:182‐192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Borges RS, Carneiro AS, Barros TG, et al. Understanding the cytotoxicity or cytoprotective effects of biological and synthetic quinone derivatives by redox mechanism. J Mol Model. 2014;20(12):2541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Cui J, Jia J. Discovery of juglone and its derivatives as potent SARS‐CoV‐2 main proteinase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;225:113789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Santos LH, Kronenberger T, Almeida RG, et al. Structure‐based identification of naphthoquinones and derivatives as novel inhibitors of main protease Mpro and papain‐like protease PLpro of SARS‐CoV‐2. bioRxiv. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Hicks EG, Kandel SE, Lampe JN. Identification of Aloe‐derived natural products as prospective lead scaffolds for SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (M(pro)) inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2022;66:128732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Gyebi GA, Ogunro OB, Adegunloye AP, et al. Potential inhibitors of coronavirus 3‐chymotrypsin‐like protease (3CL(pro)): an in silico screening of alkaloids and terpenoids from African medicinal plants. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39(9):3396‐3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Ryu YB, Park SJ, Kim YM, et al. SARS‐CoV 3CLpro inhibitory effects of quinone‐methide triterpenes from Tripterygium regelii . Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20(6):1873‐1876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Chen LR, Wang YC, Lin YW, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of isatin derivatives as effective SARS coronavirus 3CL protease inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15(12):3058‐3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Liu P, Liu H, Sun Q, et al. Potent inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease derived from N‐substituted isatin compounds. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;206:112702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Zhong B, Peng W, Du S, et al. Oridonin inhibits SARS‐CoV‐2 by targeting its 3C‐like protease. Small Sci. 2022:2100124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Hasegawa T, Imamura RM, Suzuki T, et al. Application of acoustic ejection MS system to high‐throughput screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitors. Chem Pharm Bull. 2022;70(3):199‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Zhou YF, Yan BC, Yang Q, et al. Harnessing natural products by a pharmacophore‐oriented semisynthesis approach for the discovery of potential anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 agents. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022:e202201684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Xu H, Li J, Song S, et al. Effective inhibition of coronavirus replication by Polygonum cuspidatum . Front Biosci. 2021;26(10):789‐798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Morita T, Miyakawa K, Jeremiah SS, et al. All‐trans retinoic acid exhibits antiviral effect against SARS‐CoV‐2 by inhibiting 3CLpro activity. Viruses. 2021;13(8):1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Zhang JW, Xiong Y, Wang F, et al. Discovery of 9,10‐dihydrophenanthrene derivatives as SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) inhibitors for treating COVID‐19. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;228:114030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Khan NA, Al‐Thani H, El‐Menyar A. The emergence of new SARS‐CoV‐2 variant (Omicron) and increasing calls for COVID‐19 vaccine boosters—the debate continues. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022;45:102246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Harrison C. COVID‐19 antiviral pills raise hopes for curbing pandemic. Nat Biotechnol. 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. EDP‐235‐ASBMB‐Annual‐Meeting‐Seminar_Final.pdf.
  • 247. Li J, Lin C, Zhou X, et al. Structural basis of the main proteases of coronavirus bound to drug candidate PF‐07321332. J Virol. 2022;96(8):e0201321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Owen DR, Allerton CMN, Anderson AS, et al. An oral SARS‐CoV‐2 M(pro) inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID‐19. Science. 2021;374(6575):1586‐1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Sasaki M, Tabata K, Kishimoto M, et al. Oral administration of S‐217622, a SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitor, decreases 1 viral load and accelerates recovery from clinical aspects of COVID‐19. 2022.
  • 250. Tyndall JDA. S‐217622, a 3CL protease inhibitor and clinical candidate for SARS‐CoV‐2. J Med Chem. 2022;65(9):6496‐6498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Vandyck K, Abdelnabi R, Gupta K, et al. ALG‐097111, a potent and selective SARS‐CoV‐2 3‐chymotrypsin‐like cysteine protease inhibitor exhibits in vivo efficacy in a Syrian Hamster model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;555:134‐139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Unoh Y, Uehara S, Nakahara K, et al. Discovery of S‐217622, a noncovalent oral SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL protease inhibitor clinical candidate for treating COVID‐19. J Med Chem. 2022;65(9):6499‐6512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Boras B, Jones RM, Anson BJ, et al. Preclinical characterization of an intravenous coronavirus 3CL protease inhibitor for the potential treatment of COVID19. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Hoffman RL, Kania RS, Brothers MA, et al. Discovery of ketone‐based covalent inhibitors of coronavirus 3CL proteases for the potential therapeutic treatment of COVID‐19. J Med Chem. 2020;63(21):12725‐12747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Shcherbakov D, Baev D, Kalinin M, et al. Design and evaluation of bispidine‐based SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2022;13(1):140‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Eng H, Dantonio AL, Kadar EP, et al. Disposition of nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease, across animals and humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2022;50(5):576‐590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Li H, Yang L, Liu FF, et al. Overview of therapeutic drug research for COVID‐19 in China. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(9):1133‐1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Abdelnabi R, Foo CS, Jochmans D, et al. The oral protease inhibitor (PF‐07321332) protects Syrian hamsters against infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Wong CKH, Au ICH, Lau KTK, et al. Real‐world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir among COVID‐19 inpatients during Hong Kong's Omicron BA.2 wave: an observational study. medRxiv. 2022. 2022.05.19.22275291.
  • 260. s‐217622. Available from: https://www.shionogi.com/us/en/news/2022/04/new‐data‐for‐shionogis‐covid‐19‐once‐dailyoral‐antiviral‐s‐217622‐show‐rapid‐virus‐clearance.html
  • 261. PBI‐0451‐ZW. Available from: https://ir.pardesbio.com/news‐releases/news‐release‐details/pardes‐biosciences‐presents‐interim‐clinical‐data‐ongoing‐pbi
  • 262. Mengist HM, Fan X, Jin T. Designing of improved drugs for COVID‐19: crystal structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease M(pro). Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. ASC11. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news‐releases/ascletis‐announces‐3clpro‐inhibitor‐asc11‐demonstrated‐potential‐to‐be‐effective‐treatment‐for‐covid‐19‐301527722.html
  • 264. EDDC‐2214. Available from: https://www.a‐star.edu.sg/News/a‐star‐news/news/press‐releases/everest‐medicines‐to‐develop‐commercialise‐eddc‐s‐small‐molecules
  • 265. Tripathi PK, Upadhyay S, Singh M, et al. Screening and evaluation of approved drugs as inhibitors of main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:2622‐2631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Li Z, Li X, Huang YY, et al. Identify potent SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease inhibitors via accelerated free energy perturbation‐based virtual screening of existing drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(44):27381‐27387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Chiou WC, Hsu MS, Chen YT, et al. Repurposing existing drugs: identification of SARS‐CoV‐2 3C‐like protease inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2021;36(1):147‐153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Drayman N, DeMarco JK, Jones KA, et al. Masitinib is a broad coronavirus 3CL inhibitor that blocks replication of SARS‐CoV‐2. Science. 2021;373(6557):931‐936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. Yuan S, Wang R, Chan JF, et al. Metallodrug ranitidine bismuth citrate suppresses SARS‐CoV‐2 replication and relieves virus‐associated pneumonia in Syrian hamsters. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(11):1439‐1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Chen J, Zhang Y, Zeng D, et al. Merbromin is a mixed‐type inhibitor of 3‐chyomotrypsin like protease of SARS‐CoV‐2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;591:118‐123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Kuo CJ, Chao TL, Kao HC, et al. Kinetic characterization and inhibitor screening for the proteases leading to identification of drugs against SARS‐CoV‐2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(4):e02577‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Rawson JMO, Duchon A, Nikolaitchik OA, et al. Development of a cell‐based luciferase complementation assay for identification of SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) inhibitors. Viruses. 2021;13(2):173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Chen X, Liu M, Zhang P, et al. Phage‐derived depolymerase as an antibiotic adjuvant against multidrug‐resistant Acinetobacter baumannii . Front Microbiol. 2022;13:845500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Yu L, Kim HJ, Park MK, et al. Ethacrynic acid, a loop diuretic, suppresses epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of A549 lung cancer cells via blocking of NDP‐induced WNT signaling. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;183:114339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Angiolillo DJ, Weisman SM. Clinical pharmacology and cardiovascular safety of naproxen. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017;17(2):97‐107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Si K, Wei C, Xu L, et al. Hyperuricemia and the risk of heart failure: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:770815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. Porras AMG, Terra BS, Braga TC, et al. Butenafine and analogues: an expeditious synthesis and cytotoxicity and antifungal activities. J Adv Res. 2018;14:81‐91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Ha J, Kim J, Jeong C, et al. Effect of follow‐up raloxifene therapy after denosumab discontinuation in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(7):1591‐1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279. McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Fava M, et al. Tranylcypromine versus venlafaxine plus mirtazapine following three failed antidepressant medication trials for depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1531‐1541. quiz 666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280. Mahdi M, Motyan JA, Szojka ZI, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of HIV protease inhibitors against SARS‐CoV‐2's main protease. Virol J. 2020;17(1):190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281. Ren T, Zhang Z, Fawcett JP, et al. Micro‐solid phase extraction and LC–MS(3) for the determination of triptorelin in rat plasma and application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;166:13‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282. Zhao Y, Sun H, Zheng J, et al. Identification of predictors based on drug targets highlights accurate treatment of goserelin in breast and prostate cancer. Cell Biosci. 2021;11(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283. Couto M, Vide S, Marco‐Arino N, et al. Comparison of two pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic models of rocuronium bromide during profound neuromuscular block: analysis of estimated and measured post‐tetanic count effect. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(3):473‐481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284. Kongdang P, Pruksakorn D, Koonrungsesomboon N. Preclinical experimental models for assessing laxative activities of substances‐products under investigation‐a scoping review of the literature. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(2):698‐717. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285. Dodet P, Sanapo F, Leu‐Semenescu S, et al. Sleep disorders in adults with Prader‐Willi syndrome: review of the literature and clinical recommendations based on the experience of the French reference centre. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286. Nair AB, Kumar S, Dalal P, et al. Novel dermal delivery cargos of clobetasol propionate: an update. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(2):383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287. Sehgal SN. Rapamune (Sirolimus, rapamycin): an overview and mechanism of action. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17(6):660‐665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288. Liu A, Lin W, Ping S, et al. Analysis of degradation and pathways of three common antihistamine drugs by NaClO, UV, and UV‐NaClO methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289. Elsayad K, Rolf D, Sunderkotter C, et al. Low‐dose total skin electron beam therapy plus oral bexarotene maintenance therapy for cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022;20(3):279‐285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290. Mujtaba A, Kohli K. In vitro/in vivo evaluation of HPMC/alginate based extended‐release matrix tablets of cefpodoxime proxetil. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;89:434‐441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291. Bharathi C, Jayaram P, Sunder Raj J, et al. Identification, isolation and characterization of impurities of clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;48(4):1211‐1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292. Julio C, Benoist S, Allard MA, et al. Treatment strategies to resectable metachronous colorectal liver metastases after adjuvant oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy for primary colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293. Vermersch P, Brieva‐Ruiz L, Fox RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of masitinib in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis: a randomized, phase 3, clinical trial. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;9(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294. Wang C, Li X, Cheng T, et al. Eradication of porphyromonas gingivalis persisters through colloidal bismuth subcitrate synergistically combined with metronidazole. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:748121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295. Chander J, Maini S, Subrahmanyan S, et al. Otomycosis–a clinico‐mycological study and efficacy of mercurochrome in its treatment. Mycopathologia. 1996;135(1):9‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296. Lovestone S, Boada M, Dubois B, et al. A phase II trial of tideglusib in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(1):75‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297. Comlekci E, Kutlu HM, Vejselova Sezer C. Toward stimulating apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma cells by novel nano‐carmofur compound treatment. Anticancer Drugs. 2021;32(6):657‐663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298. Wang L, Bharti KumarR, et al. Small molecule therapeutics for tauopathy in Alzheimer's disease: walking on the path of most resistance. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;209:112915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299. Das D, Pandya M. Recent advancement of direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in hepatitis C therapy. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2018;18(7):584‐596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300. Islam MT, Sarkar C, El‐Kersh DM, et al. Natural products and their derivatives against coronavirus: a review of the non‐clinical and pre‐clinical data. Phytother Res. 2020;34(10):2471‐2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301. Zhang F, Huang J, Liu W, et al. Inhibition of drug‐metabolizing enzymes by Qingfei Paidu decoction: implication of herb‐drug interactions in COVID‐19 pharmacotherapy. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021;149:111998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302. He X, Hong W, Pan X, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variant: characteristics and prevention. MedComm (2020). 2021;2(4):838‐845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303. Silva RC, Freitas HF, Campos JM, et al. Natural products‐based drug design against SARS‐CoV‐2 Mpro 3CLpro. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304. Cantrelle FX, Boll E, Brier L, et al. NMR spectroscopy of the main protease of SARS‐CoV‐2 and fragment‐based screening identify three protein hotspots and an antiviral fragment. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(48):25428‐25435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305. Hariono M, Hariyono P, Dwiastuti R, et al. Potential SARS‐CoV‐2 3CLpro inhibitors from chromene, flavonoid and hydroxamic acid compound based on FRET assay, docking and pharmacophore studies. Results Chem. 2021;3:100195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306. DI Pierro F, Khan A, Bertuccioli A, et al. Quercetin Phytosome(R) as a potential candidate for managing COVID‐19. Minerva Gastroenterol. 2021;67(2):190‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307. Thabault L, Liberelle M, Frederick R. Targeting protein self‐association in drug design. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(5):1148‐1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308. Goyal B, Goyal D. Targeting the dimerization of the main protease of coronaviruses: a potential broad‐spectrum therapeutic strategy. ACS Comb Sci. 2020;22(6):297‐305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309. Xian Y, Zhang J, Bian Z, et al. Bioactive natural compounds against human coronaviruses: a review and perspective. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(7):1163‐1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310. Huang F, Li Y, Leung EL, et al. A review of therapeutic agents and Chinese herbal medicines against SARS‐COV‐2 (COVID‐19). Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311. Bahun M, Jukic M, Oblak D, et al. Inhibition of the SARS‐CoV‐2 3CL(pro) main protease by plant polyphenols. Food Chem. 2022;373(Pt B):131594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312. Kaul R, Paul P, Kumar S, et al. Promising antiviral activities of natural flavonoids against SARS‐CoV‐2 targets: systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20):11069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313. Chen X, Wu Y, Chen C, et al. Identifying potential anti‐COVID‐19 pharmacological components of traditional Chinese medicine Lianhuaqingwen capsule based on human exposure and ACE2 biochromatography screening. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(1):222‐236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314. Leung EL, Pan HD, Huang YF, et al. The scientific foundation of Chinese herbal medicine against COVID‐19. Engineering. 2020;6(10):1099‐1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315. Ashhurst AS, Tang AH, Fajtova P, et al. Potent anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 activity by the natural product gallinamide A and analogues via inhibition of cathepsin L. J Med Chem. 2022;65(4):2956‐2970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316. Sacco MD, Ma C, Lagarias P, et al. Structure and inhibition of the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease reveal strategy for developing dual inhibitors against M(pro) and cathepsin L. Sci Adv. 2020;6(50):eabe0751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317. Zaim S, Chong JH, Sankaranarayanan V, et al. COVID‐19 and multiorgan response. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45(8):100618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318. Abou‐Ismail MY, Diamond A, Kapoor S, et al. The hypercoagulable state in COVID‐19: incidence, pathophysiology, and management. Thromb Res. 2020;194:101‐115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319. Zhao Z, Li Y, Zhou L, et al. Prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 using Traditional Chinese Medicine: a review. Phytomedicine. 2021;85:153308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320. Lau KM, Lee KM, Koon CM, et al. Immunomodulatory and anti‐SARS activities of Houttuynia cordata . J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;118(1):79‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321. Chen J, Wang YK, Gao Y, et al. Protection against COVID‐19 injury by qingfei paidu decoction via anti‐viral, anti‐inflammatory activity and metabolic programming. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322. Wu Y, Xu L, Cao G, et al. Effect and mechanism of qingfei paidu decoction in the management of pulmonary fibrosis and COVID‐19. Am J Chin Med. 2022;50(1):33‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323. Li Y, Li B, Wang P, et al. Traditional chinese medicine, qingfei paidu decoction and xuanfei baidu decoction, inhibited cytokine production via NF‐kappaB signaling pathway in macrophages: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:722126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324. Lee DYW, Li QY, Liu J, et al. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine at the forefront battle against COVID‐19: clinical experience and scientific basis. Phytomedicine. 2021;80:153337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325. Paraiso IL, Revel JS, Stevens JF. Potential use of polyphenols in the battle against COVID‐19. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2020;32:149‐155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information

Data Availability Statement

All data are freely available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from MedComm are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES