Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;8(7):e09870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09870

Table 5.

Prediction of RNA editing sites.

Type Effect Number Percentage (%)
Hydrophilic CGT (R) => TGT (C) 28 13.40
CGC (R) => TGC (C) 13
CAT (H) => TAT (Y) 20
CAC (H) => TAC (Y) 8
Hydrophobic GCT (A) => GTT (V) 3 30.29
GCG (A) => GTG (V) 7
GCC (A) => GTC (V) 2
CTT (L) => TTT (F) 13
CTC (L) => TTC (F) 5
CCT (P) => CTT (L) 19
CCG (P) => CTG (L) 35
CCC (P) => TTC (F) 6
CCC (P) => CTC (L) 7
CCA (P) => CTA (L) 45
CCT (P) => TTT (F) 14
Hydrophilic-hydrophobic TCT (S) => TTT (F) 44 47.57
TCG (S) => TTG (L) 49
TCC (S) => TTC (F) 29
TCA (S) => TTA (L) 78
CGG (R) => TGG (W) 30
ACT (T) => ATT (I) 4
ACG (T) => ATG (M) 6
ACA (T) => ATA (I) 5
Hydrophilic-stop CGA (R) => TGA (X) 3 0.77
CAA (Q) => TAA (X) 1
Hydrophobic-hydrophilic CCT (P) => TCT (S) 21 7.77
CCC (P) => TCC (S) 9
CCA (P) => TCA (S) 6
CCG (P) => TCG (S) 4