. 2022 Jul 1;13:895136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895136

TABLE 5.

Path analysis.

Hypotheses	Path relationship	Coefficients/β	t-value	Results
H1	Inspired-by -> Inspired-to	0.431^***	10.456	Supported
H2	Education -> Inspired-by	0.373^***	9.606	Supported
H3	Entertainment -> Inspired-by	0.184^***	4.685	Supported
H4	Esthetics -> Inspired-by	0.218^***	5.612	Supported
H5	Escapism -> Inspired-by	0.231^***	7.122	Supported
H6	Education ^* Destination familiarity -> Inspired-by	−0.109^*	3.095	Supported
H7	Entertainment ^* Destination familiarity -> Inspired-by	0.002	0.051	Not supported
H8	Esthetics ^* Destination familiarity ->Inspired-by	0.049	1.523	Not supported
H9	Escapism ^* Destination familiarity -> Inspired-by	0.042	1.38	Not supported
	R² inspired-by = 0.201	Q² inspired-by = 0.110
	R² inspired-to = 0.199	Q² inspired-to = 0.126

*Destination familiarity = the moderating role of destination familiarity; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.