Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 6;14(1 Suppl):5–15. doi: 10.1177/1758573220977205

Table 2.

Summary of the four case series (25 patients) included in the systematic review.

Article characteristics
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics
Procedure characteristics
Post-operative data
Author/Year Study design (level of evidence) Sample size (n) Mean age (years) Gender Side Clinical features Primary tissue affected Location Position Portals Procedure Follow-up (months) Outcome Complications Recurrence
Lunn et al. (2007)4 Retrospective case series (IV) 15 40 M NR Pain (93%), locking (40%), decreased ROM (40%) Synovium NR Beach chair P, A, + /– accessory portals PRN ELB, anterior release 63.6 (27.6–198) Constant score: improvement in pain (11.3 post-op vs. 8.9 pre-op) and ADLs (18.7 post-op vs. 12.9 pre-op) Arthritis (severe) No
28 F Synovium Beach chair 1) ELB + synovectomy 2) ELB + synovectomy 3) ELB 4) synovectomy + tenodesis Incomplete excision of loose bodies Yes (3 years post-op)
27 F Synovium Beach chair 1) ELB 2) ELB + synovectomy + tenodesis Arthritis (mild) No
18 F Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy, tenodesis Arthritis (mild) No
34 F Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy Incomplete excision of loose bodies No
18 F Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy, tenodesis No No
19 F Synovium Beach chair 1) ELB 2) ELB + synovectomy 3) ELB + synovectomy Arthritis (mild) Yes (12 years post-op)
41 M Synovium Beach chair ELB Arthritis (moderate) No
42 M Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy, tenodesis Arthritis (severe) No
42 M Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy Arthritis (moderate) No
33 F Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy, tenodesis Arthritis (severe) No
20 M Synovium Beach chair 1) ELB 2) ELB Incomplete excision of loose bodies, arthritis (mild) No
49 M Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy Arthritis (moderate) No
47 M Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy No No
41 M Synovium Beach chair ELB, synovectomy, tenodesis Arthritis (severe) No
Ranalletta et al. (2009)27 Case series (IV) 3 35 M R Pain × 2 years, decreased ROM Synovium GHJ NR NR ELB, partial synovectomy 59 Significant improvements in shoulder ROM, patient satisfaction, VAS, UCLA, DASH, Constant scores No No
29 M L Pain × 5 years, stiffness, decreased ROM Synovium GHJ NR NR ELB, partial synovectomy, arthroscopic capsulotomy, subacromial bursa adhesiolysis 28 Significant improvements in shoulder ROM, patient satisfaction, VAS, UCLA, DASH, Constant scores No No
24 M R Pain, stiffness, locking × 14 years, decreased ROM, severe deltoid and biceps atrophy Synovium GHJ NR NR ELB, partial synovectomy, arthroscopic capsulotomy 26 Significant improvements in shoulder ROM, patient satisfaction, VAS, UCLA, DASH, Constant scores No No
Urbach et al. (2008)28 Case series (IV) 5 28 M L Pain, decreased ROM Synovium NR Lateral decubitus P, A ELB, partial synovectomy 108 Constant score: 96 (post-op) vs. 100 (unaffected side) No No
30 M L Synovium NR Lateral decubitus 108 Constant score: 100 (post-op) vs. 100 (unaffected side) No Yes
22 M R Synovium NR Lateral decubitus 96 Constant score: 100 (post-op) vs. 100 (unaffected side) No Yes
30 M R Synovium NR Lateral decubitus 84 Constant score: 98 (post-op) vs. 100 (unaffected side) No No
34 F R Synovium NR Lateral decubitus 48 Constant score: 91 (post-op) vs. 100 (unaffected side) No No
Utashima et al. (2020)5 Case series (IV) 2 (of 10 underwent arthroscopic management 57 F NR Pain × 1 year Synovium GHJ, bicipital groove Beach chair P, A ELB 36 Constant score: 78 (post-op) vs. 65 (pre-op) No No
65 M NR Pain × 6 months Synovium Subacromial space Beach chair P, L ELB, acromioplasty 30 Constant score: 90 (post-op) vs. 58 (pre-op) No No

A: anterior; A-I: anteroinferior; A-S: anterosuperior; BTS: bicipital tendon sheath; ELB: excision of loose bodies; GHJ: glenohumeral joint; I: inferior; L: lateral; NR: not reported; P: posterior; P-L: posterolateral; PRN: as needed; ROM: range of motion; RTW: return to work; S: superior. ADL: activity of daily living; DASH: the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score; UCLA: The University of California Los Angeles shoulder rating scale; VAS: visual analog score. Bold indicates the cases that had failed arthroscopic management.