TABLE 3.
Results of the moderated regression analyses.
Variables | Purchase intention |
Perceived value |
||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | |
Control variables | ||||||||
Age | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.05 |
Gender | −0.07 | −0.08 | −0.04 | −0.06 | −0.07 | −0.08 | −0.08 | −0.06 |
Education | −0.18* | −0.15* | −0.14* | −0.12* | −0.08 | −0.06 | −0.03 | −0.01 |
Independent variable | ||||||||
Design aesthetics | 0.42*** | 0.32*** | 0.26*** | 0.00 | 0.05 | |||
Mediator | ||||||||
Perceived value | 0.47*** | 0.39*** | ||||||
Moderator | ||||||||
Chinese traditionality | 0.46*** | 0.47*** | ||||||
Interaction term | ||||||||
Design aesthetics × Chinese traditionality | 0.25*** | |||||||
R 2 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.27 |
ΔR 2 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
F | 2.26 | 13.00*** | 16.58*** | 20.83*** | 0.62 | 4.06** | 10.85***** | 12.21*** |
N = 201. Design aesthetics, Chinese traditionality, and their interaction were centered prior to analysis.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.