Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;14(4):452–464. doi: 10.1177/17585732211019016

Table 1.

Summary of study demographics.

Reference Sample size (females) R handed: L handed
Age (mean ± SD) (years)
Type of GHJ instability Side of GHJ instability R:L Assessment of cortical function
Patients Controls Patients Controls
Cunningham et al. 18 28 (0) 28:0 10 (0) 10:0 26.8 ± 1.2 29.6 ± 1.3 Not defined 18:10 fMRI
Haller et al. 7 15 (0) 15:0 10(0) 10:0 27.5 ± 6.4 29.0 ± 4.7 Not defined 9:6 fMRI
Howard et al. 36 16 (15) 12:4 16 (15) 12:4 24.2 ± 6.0 23.8 ± 5.1 Stanmore Classification  Type II/III 12:4 fMRI
Shitara et al. 17 14 (3) 14:0 12 (4) 12:0 28.2 ± 8.6 23.2 ± 3.2 Not defined 14:0 fMRI
Zanchi et al. 4 14 (0) 10:4 10 (0) Not given 27.3 ± 2.0 29.6 ± 1.3 Not defined 10:4 fMRI
f

MRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Stanmore Classification of GHJ instability III.