Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;20:3522–3532. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.045

Table 2.

Comparison of deep learning-based phosphorylation sites predictors.

Tool name Framework Encoding strategy Window size Average AUC Reference
MusiteDeep Keras/TensorFlow One-hot 33 0.880 [30]
PROSPECT PyTorch One-hot, EGAAC, CKSAAGP 27 0.770 [56]
DeepKinZero TensorFlow Word embedding 15 [60]
PhosTransfer TensorFlow Word embedding 0.898 [61]
GPS-PBS Keras/TensorFlow BLOSUM62 21 0.832 [62]
DeepPPSite Keras/TensorFlow BE, EBGW, CKSAAP, PSPM, IPCP 21 0.872 [57]
DeepIPs Keras/TensorFlow Word embedding 15 0.909 [63]
PhosIDN Keras/TensorFlow One-hot, PPI embedding 21 0.939 [64]
EMBER PyTorch One-hot 15 0.928 [58]

Note: -, data not available. AUC: Area under the Curve of ROC.