Date | Stage | Description | Tasks |
---|---|---|---|
11–17 April | Collective ideation and literature review. | Literature review and assessment of this work plan. |
1. Check the list of all collectively written publications which will be published in the Appendix. 2. Add missing collectively written articles. 3. Assess this workflow; if needed, suggest changes. |
18–24 April | The sequence and architecture of ideas. | Developing text structure and teaming up. |
1. Check the provisional list of topics. Edit as you see fit – delete, merge, change sequence, add more themes. 2. Add your name next to the topic you will write about. 3. Decide whether you want to author a contribution or review the paper. If you want to serve as reviewer, write down your name in the appropriate place in the Topics. Topics and reviews are allocated on a first-come-first-served basis. If there are more people interested in a topic or a reviewer position, we strongly encourage you to team up! |
25 April – 1 May | Writing up. | Writing up. | Write your 500-word entry. |
2–8 May | Critical review and re-evaluation. | Peer review. |
1. Review two sections of your choice. 2. Leave your reviewer feedback as a comment attached to the section title. 3. Edit reviewed text directly (if you please). |
9–15 May | Revising round 1 | The under/over writing. | Implement reviewer comments to your section. Discuss feedback if needed. |
16–22 May Leading authors take over and produce the first draft. | |||
23–29 May | Revising round 2 | The under/over writing. Based on the first draft, reviewers write their reviews. |
1. Authors: Read the whole paper and your section in particular. Finalise your section. Offer your final feedback for the paper. 2. Reviewers: Write up a 500-word review. |
30 May–5 June Leading authors take over and produce the final draft together with reviews. | |||
6–12 June | Authorisation | The under/over writing. | Authors and reviewers: make any last changes and authorise the final version. |
13 June Paper sent to production |