Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;19:84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01303-2

Table 1.

Comparison of physical activity levels and sedentary time spent outdoors relative to indoors in ECEC

Study ID Study Design Sample size Risk of bias Sedentary time LPA MVPA Total PA
Andersen 2017 [52] Cross-sectional 116 Low
Copeland 2016 [17] Cross-sectional 388 High
Lahuerta-Contell 2021 [51] Cross-sectional 116 High
Raustorp 2012 [16] Cross-sectional 50 High
Schlechter 2017 [48] Cross-sectional 73 High
Tandon 2015 [49] Cross-sectional 98 High
Tandon 2018 [14] {Tandon, 2018 #24} Cross-sectional 46 High ◄►
Trost 2008a [47] RCT 20 Low
Trost 2008b [47] RCT 22 Low
Vanderloo 2013 [50] Cross-sectional 31 High
Summary effect direction ◄►

Abbreviations: LPA Light intensity physical activity, MVPA Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, TPA Total physical activity; a = intervention group; b = control group

Effect direction: Study level: ▲ = outdoor time benefits outcomes (lower sedentary time; higher physical activity); ▼ = outdoor time not associated with improvements in outcomes (higher sedentary time; lower physical activity); ◄► = conflicting findings; ‘-‘= outcome not assessed

Summary: ▲ = studies show a positive association with outdoor time at ECEC; ◄► = conflicting findings