Abstract
Background
Human granulosa-lutein cells (hGLCs) amply express sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), a NAD + -dependent deacetylase that is associated with various cellular functions. SIRT1 was shown to elevate cAMP on its own and additively with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), it is therefore interesting to examine if SIRT1 affects other essential hGLC functions.
Methods
Primary hGLCs, obtained from the follicular aspirates of women undergoing IVF and SV40-transfected, immortalized hGLCs (SVOG cells), were used. Primary cells were treated with SIRT1 specific activator SRT2104, as well as hCG or their combination. Additionally, siRNA-targeting SIRT1 construct was used to silence endogenous SIRT1 in SVOG cells. PTGS2, EREG, VEGFA and FGF2 expression was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Apoptotic and necroptotic proteins were determined by specific antibodies in western blotting. Cell viability/apoptosis was determined by the XTT and flow cytometry analyses. Data were analyzed using student t-test or Mann–Whitney U test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post hoc test.
Results
In primary and immortalized hGLCs, SRT2104 significantly upregulated key ovulatory and angiogenic genes: PTGS2, EREG, FGF2 and VEGFA, these effects tended to be further augmented in the presence of hCG. Additionally, SRT2104 dose and time-dependently decreased viable cell numbers. Flow cytometry of Annexin V stained cells confirmed that SIRT1 reduced live cell numbers and increased late apoptotic and necrotic cells. Moreover, we found that SIRT1 markedly reduced anti-apoptotic BCL-XL and MCL1 protein levels and increased cleaved forms of pro-apoptotic proteins caspase-3 and PARP. SIRT1 also significantly induced necroptotic proteins RIPK1 and MLKL. RIPK1 inhibitor, necrostatin-1 mitigated SIRT1 actions on RIPK1 and MLKL but also on cleaved caspase-3 and PARP and in accordance on live and apoptotic cells, implying a role for RIPK1 in SIRT1-induced cell death. SIRT1 silencing produced inverse effects on sorted cell populations, anti-apoptotic, pro-apoptotic and necroptotic proteins, corroborating SIRT1 activation.
Conclusions
These findings reveal that in hGLCs, SIRT1 enhances the expression of ovulatory and angiogenic genes while eventually advancing cell death pathways. Interestingly, these seemingly contradictory events may have occurred in a cAMP-dependent manner.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-00970-x.
Keywords: Ovulation, Angiogenesis, Apoptosis, Necroptosis
Background
It is widely accepted that changes initiated by luteinizing hormone (LH) in the preovulatory follicle, mainly in the granulosa cell (GC) layer, coordinate ovulation [1–3]. Acting primarily via cAMP, LH elevates factors that are essential for a successful ovulation, these include prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2); the rate limiting enzyme of PGE2 and other prostaglandins [4, 5] and epidermal growth factor-like molecules: amphiregulin and epiregulin (EREG) causing cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation [6–8]. Along with ovulatory genes, LH induces two key luteal angiogenic factors: fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [9, 10]; expressed at particularly high levels during follicular–luteal transition.
An additional factor highly expressed in a cAMP-dependent manner in luteinized human GCs (hGLCs) is sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) [11–13]. SIRT1 is a NAD + -dependent deacetylase associated with various biological functions [14–16], including regulation of proliferation and secretory activity of GCs [17–20]. It was further demonstrated that SIRT1 elevated cAMP on its own and additively with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) [12], however whether SIRT1 affect ovulatory and angiogenic genes is yet to be examined.
To enhance enzymatic activity of SIRT1, several activators were investigated; the first and most frequently used is resveratrol, a polyphenol particularly abundant in grape skins [21, 22]. However, besides SIRT1 activation, resveratrol has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions [23, 24]. In addition, resveratrol stimulates other members of the SIRT family and is therefore a non-specific activator of SIRT1 [25, 26]. Consequently, specific and more potent synthetic activators of SIRT1 such as SRT1720 and SRT2104 were developed [27, 28]. We have previously reported that SRT2104 indeed augments SIRT1 levels in hGLCs and modulates cells’ functions. Amongst its action we observed that SRT2104 caused hGLCs’ death [19], but the detailed mechanism involved in SIRT1 –induced cells’ death remains unresolved.
A delicate balance between survival and apoptotic factors determines GCs’ fate. The BCL2 family proteins comprise a network that regulates intrinsic survival/apoptotic responses [29] and contains anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins. There are BCL2 homologs that promote cell survival such as B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), B-cell lymphoma-extra-large (BCL-XL), and myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1). Programmed cell death is executed by caspases, including caspase 3 which further cleaves poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) ultimately resulting in DNA fragmentation and apoptosis [30–34]. Another form of programmed cell death termed necroptosis was described [35, 36]. In this cell death pathway, receptor interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and 3 cooperate through their RIP homotypic interaction motif, leading to the recruitment and activation of mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase (MLKL), which is the executor of necroptosis [37, 38]. Interestingly, it was shown that RIPK1 can also promote apoptotic pathways [39, 40]. However, it still needs to be clarified whether one or more of these pathways are activated by SIRT1 in hGLCs.
To further understand the physiological relevance of SIRT1 in human GCs we sought here to determine how SIRT1 affects essential GCs’ functions, angiogenic and ovulatory genes as well as cell viability. To this end, SIRT1 levels were manipulated with specific activator, SRT2104, or with SIRT1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) constructs. Experiments were carried out with primary and immortalized hGLCs (SVOG cells).
Materials and methods
Chemical reagents
Unless otherwise stated, all biochemical reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and cell culture materials were from Biological industries (Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel).
Culture of primary and immortalized hGLCs
Granulosa-lutein cells were obtained from the follicular aspirates of four women under 35 years of age who were subjected to the long suppression protocol [41] by IVF due to male factor infertility, as previously described [19, 42]. At least ten follicles from each patient were used to obtain follicular fluids that were further combined and used for each cell isolation. Four aspirations from four women were performed to obtain GLCs for four separate experiments. Briefly, the aspirates were centrifuged (3 min at 3000 × g) and erythrocytes were removed using an Ammonium Chloride Potassium (ACK) buffer (0.15 mol/L NH4Cl, 1.0 mmol/L KHCO3, and 0.1 nmol/L EDTA). Moreover, owing to ethical issues and the limited number of primary hGLCs obtained during the isolation procedure, non-tumorigenic immortalized hGLCs also termed SVOG cells were also used in this study. These cells were a generous gift from N Auersperg and P Leung (University of British Columbia, Canada) produced by transfecting primary hGLCs with the SV40 large T antigen [43]. SVOG cells have produced comparable results as those obtained in primary cells demonstrating that they are a reliable model for hGLCs [19, 44–47]. In the current study, cells from passage 14–19 were utilized.
hGLCs were seeded in 6-well plates (150,000 cells/well), while SVOG cells were seeded in T25 culture flasks (600,000 cells/flask) and only after reaching confluence, were seeded in 6-well plates. Cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mmol/L L-glutamine and 100 mg/mL penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. SVOG cells were treated with control medium (DMEM/F-12 containing 1% FCS) or SRT2104 (50 μmol/L) for 24 h. Primary hGLCs were incubated with control medium, hCG (10 IU), SRT2104 (50 μmol/L), or the combined treatment of hCG and SRT2104 for 24 h. Then, the total RNA was extracted from the cells.
siRNA transfection
SVOG cells were cultured for 24 h, and then transfected using INTERFERin transfection reagent (Polyplus, Illkirch, France) in Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium at 1% FCS according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were transfected with 10 nmol/L small interfering RNA (siRNA; Genecust, Luxembourg) constructs targeting SIRT1, or with scrambled siRNA (siNC; negative control). The SIRT1 siRNA (siSIRT1) sequences were UAAUCCUGAAAUUCUUAGC [dT][dT] (sense) and GCUAAGAAUUUCAGGAUUA [dT][dT] (antisense). The siNC sequences were UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT [dT][dT] (sense) and ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT [dT][dT] (antisense). After 6 and 24 h of transfection, the media were replaced to DMEM/F-12 with 1% FCS. Cells were collected 48 h post-transfection for protein extraction.
Determination of viable cell numbers
Total cell numbers were estimated as previously described [19, 48], using the XTT assay Kit (Biological Industries), which measures the reduction of a tetrazolium component by the mitochondria of viable cells. Briefly, SVOG cells were seeded in 96 well plates (6000 cells/well) and cultured overnight in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FCS. The next day, the cells were transferred to starvation medium (0.5% BSA in 0.1% FCS) and treated with either control or SRT2104 (10 -50 μmol/L) for 24-72 h. Each treatment was performed in quadruplicate. On the day of measurement, XTT was added to the culture media according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 3–5 h. Afterwards, the absorbance was read at 450 nm (reference absorbance, 630 nm).
Analysis of cell death by flow cytometry
Cell viability/apoptosis was determined using the Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) double-staining apoptosis using the MEBCYTO Apoptosis Kit (Medical and Biological, Woburn, MA) as previously described [49]. Briefly, cells were incubated with either control media, SRT2104 (50 µmol/L) for 24 or 48 h or when indicated pre-treated with 20 µmol/L necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) for 2 h, or cells were transfected with 10 nmol/L of siNC or siRNA targeting SIRT1 and collected 48 h post transfection. Afterwards, cells were trypsinized and washed once with PBS. Then, cells were centrifuged and suspended in 500 μL of binding buffer, after which 10 μL of Annexin V- FITC and 5 μl of PI staining solution were added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Next, the mixture was analyzed using a BD C6 Accuri (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) plus flow cytometer. Data analysis was done using the BD C6 Accuri plus software.
Total RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using the TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed by using the qScript cDNA synthesis kit (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using the LightCycler 96 system with LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), as described previously [19]. The sequences of primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 1. Primers were developed using Oligo Primer Analysis Software (Molecular Biology Insights, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA), based on the available human sequences. All primers were designed to span an intron to prevent amplification of genomic DNA, and have single-product melting curves, as well as consistent amplification efficiencies between 1.8 and 2.2. Additionally, as designed the Tm (°C) for all reaction ranged between 55.8 to 56.2 o C as also previously described [19, 50]. The threshold cycle (Ct) values of each sample were generated, and the relative abundance of mRNA was calculated as 2−ΔCt = 2−(Ct target gene–Ct housekeeping gene) [51]. Expression data were normalized against housekeeping beta-actin (ACTB).
Table 1.
Gene Name | Sequence (5’-3’) | Accession no. |
---|---|---|
ACTB | f: CGGGACCTGACGGACTACCTC | NM_001100 (46) |
r: GCCATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTCC | ||
PTGS2 | f: CCCTTCCTCCTGTGCCTGATGA | NM_000963 |
r: GTGAAGTGCTGGGCAAAGAATG | ||
EREG | f: AGGAGGATGGAGATGCTCTG | NM_001432 |
r: TGGATTGTCTTCTGTCTGAAC | ||
FGF2 | f: GCCAGGTAACGGTTAGCACAC | NM_002006 |
r: GGCTTCTTCCTGCGCATCC | ||
VEGFA | f: ATCGAGACCCTGGTGGACA | NM_001025366 (47) |
r: CCTCGGCTTGTCACATCTGC |
Abbreviations: f forward, r reverse
Protein extraction and western blot analyses
Total proteins were extracted from cultured cells as described previously [12, 46]. Briefly, cells were isolated by scrapping cells in sample buffer (1 mol/L Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 20% (v/v) glycerol, 4% (w/v) SDS and 0.0002% (w/v) bromophenol blue and 1% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol) containing phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 1 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The samples were sonicated for 10–15 s using a Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disruptor (Heat Systems Inc, NY, USA) to complete cell lysis and shear DNA and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. The proteins were separated on 7.5–14% SDS-PAGE, and subsequently transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Tamar Laboratory supplies ltd, Israel). Non-specific binding sites were blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST (20 mmol/L Tris, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20; pH 7.6) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were further incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies listed in Table 2. The next day, membranes were washed three times in TBST (10 min each) and incubated with alkaline peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Table 2) in 1% skim milk in TBST for 1.5 h at room temperature. After washing with TBST three times for 5 min, immune complexes were visualized by chemiluminescence procedure using EZ ECL kit (Biological industries). Images were captured with Image Lab software (BioRad, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The intensity of bands was quantified using Gel-Pro 32 Software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD), and normalized to the levels of total p44/42 MAPK, used as internal control for protein loading.
Table 2.
Antibody target | Dilution | Species specificity | Source | Supplier | Catalog no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCL1 | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology (Danvers MA, USA) | CS-5453 |
BCL-XL | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-2762 |
PARP | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-9532 |
Full-length Caspase 3 | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-14220 |
Cleaved Caspase 3 | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-9664 |
RIPK1 | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-14993 |
MLKL | 1:1000 | Human | Rabbit | Cell signaling Technology | CS-3493 |
Total p44/42 MAPK | 1:5000 | Human | Rabbit | Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA) | ABS44 |
HRP-linked IgG | 1:10,000 | Anti-rabbit | Donkey | Jackson immunoResearch (West Grove PA, USA) | 711–035-152 |
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad PRISM v.6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All experiments were repeated at least three times with each repeat constituting cells obtained from different passages. The student t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between two groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test was used to analyze the significance of differences within and between multiple groups. In all analyses, a value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant, and unless otherwise stated asterisks (* p˂0.05, ** p˂ 0.01, *** p˂ 0.001) or hashtags (## p˂ 0.01, ### p˂ 0.001) indicate significant differences from their respective controls.
Results
SRT2104 augmented expression of ovulatory and angiogenic genes
Because SIRT1 was shown to elevate cAMP in hGLCs [12], it was of interest to investigate whether SIRT1 activator—SRT2104 affects key ovulatory and angiogenic genes. Indeed, we observed that SRT2104 significantly augmented expression levels of PTGS2 (by 3.2-fold, p < 0.01, Fig. 1A), EREG (2.2-fold, p < 0.01, Fig. 1B), FGF2 (1.9-fold, p < 0.001, Fig. 1C) and VEGFA (1.9-fold, p < 0.001, Fig. 1D) in SVOG cells. To examine the effect of SIRT1 in the presence of the physiological activator of cAMP in these cells –hCG, the next experiment utilized primary hGLCs (Fig. 2). A similar response was observed in the primary hGLCs; SRT2104 significantly stimulated these genes by 1.5—4 folds (Fig. 2). Interestingly, in these cells VEGFA was the gene most strongly affected by SIRT1 (Fig. 2D). As expected, hCG robustly stimulated PTGS2, EREG, FGF2 and VEGFA (Fig. 2). The stimulatory effect of SRT2104 on FGF2 was further significantly augmented in the presence of hCG; there was a similar tendency in the case of PTGS2 and VEGFA. The combined treatment of hCG and SRT2104 also strongly increased EREG (7.5-fold) when compared to SRT2104 alone (1.3-fold; Fig. 2B), but there was no additive effect as compared to hCG alone, perhaps due to the robust EREG response to hCG alone in these cells.
Effect of SIRT1 activation on viable and apoptotic cell populations
To further understand the physiological relevance of SIRT1 in human GCs, we evaluated its effect on cells’ viability. Different concentrations (10, 25 and 50 μmol/L) of SRT2104 were examined for various time points as indicated in Fig. 3. This data shows that SRT2104 significantly decreased viable cell numbers in a dose- and time-dependent manner with a maximal inhibitory effect of about 70% reduction after 72 h at the maximal dose examined (50 μmol/L) as compared to control cells. The number of control cells incubated in basal media remained stable over 72 h of culture (data not shown).
Next, we sought to support XTT results with flow cytometry which enables to detect apoptotic and necrotic cell populations (Fig. 4). Incubation of cells with 50 μmol/L of SRT2104 for 48 h resulted in significantly reduced live cell numbers and increased late apoptotic and necrotic cell populations compared to control cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 4B) confirming and extending XTT results.
To further substantiate the role of SIRT1, its endogenous levels were silenced using SIRT1 siRNA constructs. Transfection of SVOG cells with SIRT1 siRNA efficiently silenced SIRT1 mRNA (~ 75% decrease) and protein (~ 80% decrease) levels (data not shown, [12]). When compared to scrambled siRNA (siNC), SIRT1 silencing had no significant effects as shown in Fig. 4D. However, when SIRT1 silencing was compared to SRT2104 treatment (Fig. 4E), the opposing effects of activating and silencing SIRT1 on live, apoptotic and necrotic cell populations became evident. Knockdown of SIRT1 resulted in significantly greater number of live cells (p < 0.001) and fewer late apoptotic (p < 0.001) and necrotic cells (p < 0.01) as compared to SRT2104-treated cells.
Effects of SIRT1 on pro- and anti- apoptotic proteins
To further elucidate the specific pathways responsible for SIRT1- induced cell death, we assessed anti-apoptotic members of BCL2 family: BCL-XL and MCL1. Significant effects were evident at 48 h following SRT2104 treatment where the levels of BCL-XL protein were significantly reduced by 45% (p < 0.05, Fig. 5A). MCL1 protein was significantly reduced as early as 24 h (20% reduction) and was further reduced after 48 h (35% reduction) of SRT2104 treatment (p < 0.01, Fig. 5B). These results were corroborated with SIRT1 silencing, showing that SIRT1 ablation was accompanied by a significant 2.3 fold increase in BCL-XL protein level (p < 0.05, Fig. 5C).
We then went on to investigate the effects of SIRT1 on pro-apoptotic proteins, full-length and cleaved caspase 3 as well as full-length and cleaved PARP. Full-length caspase 3 protein levels were significantly reduced (by 39%, p < 0.001) by SRT2104 only after 48 h treatment (Fig. 6A), while cleaved caspase 3 levels were markedly elevated from 24 h onwards; there was a 2.3-fold increase at 24 h and a further 2.8-fold increase at 48 h, as compared with the respective control levels (Fig. 6B). Similarly, full-length PARP protein expression was diminished by SIRT1 activation at 48 h treatment (p < 0.01, Fig. 6C) whereas cleaved and active PARP levels were significantly increased both at 24 h (1.8-fold increase, p < 0.01) and 48 h (1.7-fold increase, p < 0.05) as shown in Fig. 6D. In accord, SIRT1 silencing led to a significant reduction of 50% in cleaved PARP protein levels (p < 0.01, Fig. 6F). As a positive control we used staurosporine (STS) which is a broad-spectrum protein kinase inhibitor and effector of apoptosis in many cell types [52]. STS showed the expected reduction in the levels of full-length caspase 3 (p < 0.05, Fig. 6A) and full-length PARP (p < 0.05, Fig. 6C) with simultaneous robust elevation in cleaved caspase 3 (p < 0.01, Fig. 6B) and cleaved PARP (p < 0.05, Fig. 6D) proteins.
Moreover, we found that the ratio of cleaved to full-length caspase 3 levels were markedly elevated from 24 h onwards; there was a 4.6-fold increase at 24 h and a further 6.1-fold increase at 48 h, as compared with the respective control levels (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Similarly, the ratio of cleaved to full-length PARP levels were significantly increased both at 24 h (1.7-fold increase) and 48 h (2.3-fold increase) as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1B. SIRT1 silencing significantly reduced the ratio of cleaved to full-length PARP protein levels to 0.45 (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 1C). These findings support the flow cytometry analyses presented in Fig. 4, confirming the role of SIRT1 as an activator of apoptotic pathway in hGLCs.
Effects of SIRT1 on necroptosis
Since an increase in necrotic cells after SRT2104 treatment was observed (Fig. 4A and B), we examined further the potential role of SIRT1 on necrosome components, RIPK1 and MLKL (Fig. 7). RIPK1 protein was significantly induced by SRT2104 at 24 h (Fig. 7A). MLKL protein abundance was also augmented by SIRT1 activation and this effect was evident from 24 to 48 h of incubation (1.5 and 1.4 -fold increase respectively, Fig. 7B). SIRT1 silencing, on the other hand, significantly reduced MLKL protein (p < 0.05, Fig. 7D), substantiating the role of SIRT1 in regulating this protein. However, SIRT1 knockdown had no effect on RIPK1 (Fig. 7C).
To further ascertain the potential role of necroptosis in SIRT1-induced hGLCs’ death, we assessed the outcome of a RIPK1 inhibitor, Nec-1 [53]. As shown in Fig. 8B, at 24 h Nec-1 did not significantly affect SRT2104 actions on either cell population. However, after 48 h of incubation, Nec-1 abolished SRT2104 actions on live and late apoptotic cell populations but had no effect on the necrotic cells as shown in Fig. 8D.
We also examined the effect of Nec-1 on pro-apoptotic and necroptotic proteins in SRT2104-treated cells (Fig. 9). In agreement with the results presented in Fig. 8, Nec-1 significantly mitigated SRT2104-induced cleaved caspase 3 (41% reduction, Fig. 9A) and cleaved PARP (47% reduction, Fig. 9B), confirming that Nec-1 counteracts apoptotic actions of SIRT1. However, despite the observation that Nec-1 did not significantly affect SIRT1 induced necrotic cell population (in Fig. 8B and D), it counteracted SRT2104 induced RIPK1 and MLKL protein levels (33.6 and 42% reduction, respectively; Fig. 9C and D).
Discussion
This study highlights the biological functions of SIRT1 in hGLCs, demonstrating that it upregulates the expression of key ovulatory genes PTGS2 and EREG, and the main angiogenic genes FGF2 and VEGFA. Several of these genes were further augmented in the presence of hCG suggesting cAMP-dependent action of SIRT1. This study also provides extensive data detailing the mechanisms of granulosa cell death initiated by SIRT1, showing that SIRT1 promotes both apoptosis and necroptosis (summarized in Fig. 10). Importantly, the effects of SIRT1 activation with SRT2104 were corroborated by SIRT1 silencing. These findings therefore indicate that SIRT1 exerts diverse and seemingly contradicting actions in hGLCs.
One of the novel findings in the present study is that SIRT1 upregulates the mRNA expression of PTGS2, EREG, FGF2 and VEGFA, known to be elevated in GCs during the periovulatory period [4, 8, 54, 55], further studies are needed to ascertain that their protein levels are similarly elevated by SIRT1. These genes are elevated most probably as a result of SIRT1 ability to increase cAMP levels as previously observed in hGLCs [12] and in other cell types [56, 57]. However, unlike LH/hCG that stimulate cAMP by direct activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC), augmentation of cAMP by SIRT1 occurs via inhibition of phosphodiesterase enzymes which catalyze the breakdown of cAMP to inactive 5′AMP [58, 59]. This may be the reason why the magnitude of cAMP levels produced by SIRT1 activation [12] and consequently the increase of ovulatory and angiogenic genes in GCs (this study), are lower than those induced by LH/hCG [4, 8, 54, 55] and other upstream regulators of AC such as PGE2 [50]. Activation of two different mechanisms promoting intracellular cAMP levels can also explain the additive action of SIRT1 and hCG in hGLCs. This contention portrays SIRT1 as an auxiliary factor enhancing the expression of (ovulatory and angiogenic) genes whose role during the periovulatory period and corpus luteum (CL) formation is indispensable.
Studies have suggested that SIRT1 promotes apoptosis [60, 61], as also shown in the current study, where we observed that SIRT1 activation with SRT2104 dose- and time-dependently reduced viable cell numbers and increased late apoptotic and necrotic hGLC populations. Examining proteins considered to be hallmarks of apoptosis, the mechanism of SIRT1-induced cell death was revealed here. We found that SIRT1 reduced anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins, BCL-XL and MCL1. Additionally, SIRT1 increased the levels of pro-apoptotic cleaved, active caspase 3 and PARP proteins. As well as the ratio of cleaved to full-length caspase 3 and PARP. Ablation of endogenous SIRT1 with siRNA produced opposing actions with increased live cell numbers and reduced late apoptotic and necrotic cell populations as compared to SIRT1 activation. SIRT1 silencing also led to increased BCL-XL protein and reduced the ratio of cleaved PARP to full-length PARP levels. Our results therefore suggest that SIRT1 promotes apoptosis by inhibiting anti-apoptotic BCL2 members and activating pro-apoptotic proteins.
Apart from apoptosis, a form of programmed necrosis termed necroptosis has also been unearthed. Necroptosis like necrosis, morphologically leads to rounding of the cell, cytoplasmic swelling and rupture of the plasma membrane thereby leading to spilling of the intracellular contents [35]. RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL are the essential regulators of necroptosis [37, 62–64]. Recently it has been suggested that necroptosis is one of the mechanisms of cell death in the ovary and studies have shown an increase in the necroptotic proteins RIPK1 and RIPK3 in cultured primary hGLCs [65, 66]. Also, the luteolytic hormone prostaglandin F2 alpha treatment increased protein levels of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL in bovine CL [67, 68]. Here we showed that necrosome components RIPK1 and MLKL were elevated in hGLCs after SRT2104 treatment. These findings were further reinforced by the observation that silencing of SIRT1 led to reduced MLKL protein levels. We were however unable to detect phosphorylated forms of RIPK1 and MLKL at the time points employed, perhaps because phosphoproteins are unstable and may be difficult to detect. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study highlighting the involvement of SIRT1 in necroptotic cell death in the ovary. Nec-1, a selective and potent allosteric inhibitor of RIPK1 [53, 69] further substantiated these findings. Nec-1 efficiently blocks RIPK1-RIP3-MLKL signal transduction thereby inhibiting necroptosis [53, 70]. Moreover, Nec-1 can also inhibit RIPK1- dependent apoptosis as it promoted cell survival and reduced the levels of apoptotic proteins in non-GC types [71, 72]. Accordingly, Nec-1 also increased the viability of luteal steroidogenic cells and hGLCs [66, 68]. Here we found that Nec-1 attenuated SIRT1 actions on live and late apoptotic GC populations and decreased SIRT1- induced apoptotic and necroptotic proteins, suggesting that SIRT1-induced necroptosis and apoptosis are RIPK1-dependent. Nec-1 did not however reduce the SIRT1 induced necrotic cell population in our study, while the time frame was sufficient for attenuating the proteins (which precede actual cell death) it was inadequate in preventing necroptosis.
Past evidence provided by many research groups including ours have convincingly demonstrated that SVOG cells responded similarly to primary hGLCs for a variety of signals including SIRT1[45, 73–76]. Therefore, the results obtained here on SIRT1 induced apoptosis and necroptosis in SVOG cells are relevant to primary hGLCs, however more research is necessary to demonstrate it unequivocally.
What is the mechanism underlying SIRT1 induced apoptosis? As discussed earlier we and others have demonstrated that SIRT1 activation enhances cAMP levels [12, 56, 57]. Perhaps surprisingly, quite a few studies had linked elevated intracellular levels of cAMP to apoptosis in various cell types [77–79] including ovarian follicular cells and GCs [80–83]. For instance, it was shown that treatment of GCs with forskolin, or 8-bromo-cAMP induced apoptosis as evidenced by DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation. Death promoting effects of cAMP were also accompanied by an increase in the expression of apoptotic proteins [83]. In fact, Yacobi et al., reported that LH treatment induced in preovulatory follicles’ progesterone production and caspase activity [82, 84]. Our results may therefore suggest that SIRT1-induced cAMP is involved in promoting apoptosis of hGLCs.
Conclusions
This study extends our knowledge of the roles and signaling pathways employed by SIRT1 in hGLCs during the periovulatory period. Together with our previous reports [12, 19], the results described here highlight the role of SIRT1 on critical GCs- borne factors, cAMP, endothelin 2, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 as well as key ovulatory and angiogenic genes, indicating that SIRT1 has wide-ranging effects on GCs functions.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the German–Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development for funding this work, and to the International School of Agricultural Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment for providing a fellowship to M. Szymanska.
Abbreviations
- AC
Adenylyl cyclase
- BCL-XL
B-cell lymphoma-extra large
- cAMP
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate
- CL
Corpus luteum
- EREG
Epiregulin
- FGF2
Fibroblast growth factor 2
- GCs
Granulosa cells
- hCG
Human chorionic gonadotropin
- hGLC
Human granulosa lutein cells
- IVF
In vitro fertilization
- LH
Luteinizing hormone
- MCL1
Myeloid cell leukemia 1
- MLKL
Mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase
- Nec-1
Necrostatin-1
- PARP
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
- PI
Propidium iodide
- PTGS2
Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2
- qPCR
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- RIPK1
Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1
- siRNA
Small interfering RNA
- SIRT1
Sirtuin-1
- STS
Staurosporine
- VEGFA
Vascular endothelial growth factor A
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, J.S, M.S. and R.M.; methodology, J.S. and M.S.; formal analysis, M.S. and R.M.; investigation, J.S. and M.S; data curation, J.S, M.S. and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, J.S, M.S. and R.M.; visualization, J.S, M.S. and R.M.; supervision, R.M.; project administration, R.M.; funding acquisition, R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF), grant number I-1417–201.2/2017 and by the Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment Research Fund for International Cooperation scholarship.
Availability of data and materials
The data presented in this study are available on personal request from the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Barzilai University Medical Center in Ashqelon, Israel (approval 0109–17). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Richards JS, Ascoli M. Endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine signaling pathways that regulate ovulation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(5):313–325. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rimon-Dahari N, Yerushalmi-Heinemann L, Alyagor L, Dekel N. Ovarian folliculogenesis. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2016;58:167–190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31973-5_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Russell DL, Robker RL. Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(3):289–312. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shrestha K, Lukasik K, Baufeld A, Vanselow J, Moallem U, Meidan R. Regulation of ovulatory genes in bovine granulosa cells: lessons from siRNA silencing of PTGS2. Reproduction. 2015;149(1):21–29. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sirois J, Sayasith K, Brown KA, Stock AE, Bouchard N, Dore M. Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(5):373–385. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Conti M, Hsieh M, Park JY, Su YQ. Role of the epidermal growth factor network in ovarian follicles. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(4):715–723. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Park JY, Su YQ, Ariga M, Law E, Jin SL, Conti M. EGF-like growth factors as mediators of LH action in the ovulatory follicle. Science. 2004;303(5658):682–684. doi: 10.1126/science.1092463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shimada M, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Richards JS. Paracrine and autocrine regulation of epidermal growth factor-like factors in cumulus oocyte complexes and granulosa cells: key roles for prostaglandin synthase 2 and progesterone receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(6):1352–1365. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stouffer RL, Bishop CV, Bogan RL, Xu F, Hennebold JD. Endocrine and local control of the primate corpus luteum. Reprod Biol. 2013;13(4):259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yamashita H, Kamada D, Shirasuna K, Matsui M, Shimizu T, Kida K, et al. Effect of local neutralization of basic fibroblast growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor by a specific antibody on the development of the corpus luteum in the cow. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(9):1449–1456. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Park SJ, Ahmad F, Philp A, Baar K, Williams T, Luo H, et al. Resveratrol ameliorates aging-related metabolic phenotypes by inhibiting cAMP phosphodiesterases. Cell. 2012;148(3):421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Szymanska M, Manthe S, Shrestha K, Girsh E, Harlev A, Meidan R. The cAMP pathway promotes sirtuin-1 expression in human granulosa-lutein cells. Reprod Biol. 2020;20(3):273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2020.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Han Y, Luo H, Wang H, Cai J, Zhang Y. SIRT1 induces resistance to apoptosis in human granulosa cells by activating the ERK pathway and inhibiting NF-kappaB signaling with anti-inflammatory functions. Apoptosis. 2017;22(10):1260–1272. doi: 10.1007/s10495-017-1386-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Imai S, Chen D, Su F, Shiloh A, et al. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell. 2001;107(2):137–148. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Motta MC, Divecha N, Lemieux M, Kamel C, Chen D, Gu W, et al. Mammalian SIRT1 represses forkhead transcription factors. Cell. 2004;116(4):551–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00126-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhai Z, Tang M, Yang Y, Lu M, Zhu WG, Li T. Identifying human SIRT1 substrates by integrating heterogeneous information from various sources. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04847-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Morita Y, Wada-Hiraike O, Yano T, Shirane A, Hirano M, Hiraike H, et al. Resveratrol promotes expression of SIRT1 and StAR in rat ovarian granulosa cells: an implicative role of SIRT1 in the ovary. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sirotkin AV, Dekanova P, Harrath AH, Alwasel SH, Vasicek D. Interrelationships between sirtuin 1 and transcription factors p53 and NF-kappaB (p50/p65) in the control of ovarian cell apoptosis and proliferation. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;358(2):627–632. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Szymanska M, Manthe S, Shrestha K, Girsh E, Harlev A, Kisliouk T, et al. Sirtuin-1 inhibits endothelin-2 expression in human granulosa-lutein cells via hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha and epigenetic modificationsdagger. Biol Reprod. 2021;104(2):387–398. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tan XW, You W, Song EL, Zhao HB, Liu XM, Wang HZ, et al. Effect of SIRT1 on cellular apoptosis and steroidogenesis in bovine ovarian granulosa cells in vitro. Livest Sci. 2015;180:257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Howitz KT, Bitterman KJ, Cohen HY, Lamming DW, Lavu S, Wood JG, et al. Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature. 2003;425(6954):191–196. doi: 10.1038/nature01960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lagouge M, Argmann C, Gerhart-Hines Z, Meziane H, Lerin C, Daussin F, et al. Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1alpha. Cell. 2006;127(6):1109–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kao CL, Chen LK, Chang YL, Yung MC, Hsu CC, Chen YC, et al. Resveratrol protects human endothelium from H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative stress and senescence via SirT1 activation. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17(9):970–979. doi: 10.5551/jat.4333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sanchez-Fidalgo S, Cardeno A, Villegas I, Talero E, de la Lastra CA. Dietary supplementation of resveratrol attenuates chronic colonic inflammation in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;633(1–3):78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Borra MT, Smith BC, Denu JM. Mechanism of human SIRT1 activation by resveratrol. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(17):17187–17195. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501250200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaeberlein M, McDonagh T, Heltweg B, Hixon J, Westman EA, Caldwell SD, et al. Substrate-specific activation of sirtuins by resveratrol. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(17):17038–17045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500655200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Camins A, Sureda FX, Junyent F, Verdaguer E, Folch J, Pelegri C, et al. Sirtuin activators: designing molecules to extend life span. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1799(10–12):740–749. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Milne JC, Lambert PD, Schenk S, Carney DP, Smith JJ, Gagne DJ, et al. Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;450(7170):712–716. doi: 10.1038/nature06261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hata AN, Engelman JA, Faber AC. The BCL2 family: key mediators of the apoptotic response to targeted anticancer therapeutics. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(5):475–487. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Decker P, Muller S. Modulating poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activity: potential for the prevention and therapy of pathogenic situations involving DNA damage and oxidative stress. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2002;3(3):275–283. doi: 10.2174/1389201023378265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Garrido C, Galluzzi L, Brunet M, Puig PE, Didelot C, Kroemer G. Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(9):1423–1433. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kale J, Osterlund EJ, Andrews DW. BCL-2 family proteins: changing partners in the dance towards death. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):65–80. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Puig B, Tortosa A, Ferrer I. Cleaved caspase-3, caspase-7 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase are complementarily but differentially expressed in human medulloblastomas. Neurosci Lett. 2001;306(1–2):85–88. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01873-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Salvesen GS. Caspases: opening the boxes and interpreting the arrows. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9(1):3–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vanden Berghe T, Vanlangenakker N, Parthoens E, Deckers W, Devos M, Festjens N, et al. Necroptosis, necrosis and secondary necrosis converge on similar cellular disintegration features. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(6):922–930. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vanlangenakker N, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Many stimuli pull the necrotic trigger, an overview. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(1):75–86. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G. Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(10):700–714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wu W, Liu P, Li J. Necroptosis: an emerging form of programmed cell death. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;82(3):249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bertrand MJ, Vandenabeele P. The ripoptosome: death decision in the cytosol. Mol Cell. 2011;43(3):323–325. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tenev T, Bianchi K, Darding M, Broemer M, Langlais C, Wallberg F, et al. The ripoptosome, a signaling platform that assembles in response to genotoxic stress and loss of IAPs. Mol Cell. 2011;43(3):432–448. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fleming R, Haxton MJ, Hamilton MP, Conaghan CJ, Black WP, Yates RW, et al. Combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog and exogenous gonadotropins for ovulation induction in infertile women: efficacy related to ovarian function assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(2):376–381. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80088-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Szymanska M, Shrestha K, Girsh E, Harlev A, Eisenberg I, Imbar T, et al. Reduced endothelin-2 and hypoxic signaling pathways in granulosa-lutein cells of PCOS women. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8216. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lie BL, Leung E, Leung PC, Auersperg N. Long-term growth and steroidogenic potential of human granulosa-lutein cells immortalized with SV40 large T antigen. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1996;120(2):169–176. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(96)03835-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chang HM, Cheng JC, Taylor E, Leung PC. Oocyte-derived BMP15 but not GDF9 down-regulates connexin43 expression and decreases gap junction intercellular communication activity in immortalized human granulosa cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(5):373–383. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gau001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen YC, Chang HM, Cheng JC, Tsai HD, Wu CH, Leung PC. Transforming growth factor-beta1 up-regulates connexin43 expression in human granulosa cells. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(9):2190–2201. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shrestha K, Onasanya AE, Eisenberg I, Wigoda N, Yagel S, Yalu R, et al. miR-210 and GPD1L regulate EDN2 in primary and immortalized human granulosa-lutein cells. Reproduction. 2018;155(2):197–205. doi: 10.1530/REP-17-0574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yalu R, Oyesiji AE, Eisenberg I, Imbar T, Meidan R. HIF1A-dependent increase in endothelin 2 levels in granulosa cells: role of hypoxia, LH/cAMP, and reactive oxygen species. Reproduction. 2015;149(1):11–20. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Basavaraja R, Przygrodzka E, Pawlinski B, Gajewski Z, Kaczmarek MM, Meidan R. Interferon-tau promotes luteal endothelial cell survival and inhibits specific luteolytic genes in bovine corpus luteum. Reproduction. 2017;154(5):559–568. doi: 10.1530/REP-17-0290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Basavaraja R, Madusanka ST, Drum JN, Shrestha K, Farberov S, Wiltbank MC, et al. Interferon-tau exerts direct prosurvival and antiapoptotic actions in luteinized bovine granulosa cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shrestha K, Meidan R. The cAMP-EPAC pathway mediates PGE2-induced FGF2 in bovine granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 2018;159(10):3482–3491. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chae HJ, Kang JS, Byun JO, Han KS, Kim DU, Oh SM, et al. Molecular mechanism of staurosporine-induced apoptosis in osteoblasts. Pharmacol Res. 2000;42(4):373–381. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2000.0700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Degterev A, Hitomi J, Germscheid M, Ch'en IL, Korkina O, Teng X, et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4(5):313–321. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Berisha B, Steffl M, Amselgruber W, Schams D. Changes in fibroblast growth factor 2 and its receptors in bovine follicles before and after GnRH application and after ovulation. Reproduction. 2006;131(2):319–329. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.van den Driesche S, Myers M, Gay E, Thong KJ, Duncan WC. HCG up-regulates hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in luteinized granulosa cells: implications for the hormonal regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor A in the human corpus luteum. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(8):455–464. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gan040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chung JH. Metabolic benefits of inhibiting cAMP-PDEs with resveratrol. Adipocyte. 2012;1(4):256–258. doi: 10.4161/adip.21158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Park SJ, Ahmad F, Um JH, Brown AL, Xu X, Kang H, et al. Specific Sirt1 activator-mediated improvement in glucose homeostasis requires Sirt1-independent activation of AMPK. EBioMedicine. 2017;18:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ahmad F, Murata T, Shimizu K, Degerman E, Maurice D, Manganiello V. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: important signaling modulators and therapeutic targets. Oral Dis. 2015;21(1):e25–50. doi: 10.1111/odi.12275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Beavo JA. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: functional implications of multiple isoforms. Physiol Rev. 1995;75(4):725–748. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.4.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jin Q, Yan T, Ge X, Sun C, Shi X, Zhai Q. Cytoplasm-localized SIRT1 enhances apoptosis. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(1):88–97. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yu H, Kim YM, Cho M. Cytoplasm-localized SIRT1 downregulation attenuates apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in cisplatin-resistant lung cancer A549 cells. J Cancer. 2020;11(15):4495–4509. doi: 10.7150/jca.44383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liu T, Sun X, Cao Z. Shikonin-induced necroptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via ROS overproduction and upregulation of RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL expression. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:2605–2614. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S200740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lu B, Gong X, Wang ZQ, Ding Y, Wang C, Luo TF, et al. Shikonin induces glioma cell necroptosis in vitro by ROS overproduction and promoting RIP1/RIP3 necrosome formation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(11):1543–1553. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou Z, Lu B, Wang C, Wang Z, Luo T, Piao M, et al. RIP1 and RIP3 contribute to shikonin-induced DNA double-strand breaks in glioma cells via increase of intracellular reactive oxygen species. Cancer Lett. 2017;390:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Blohberger J, Kunz L, Einwang D, Berg U, Berg D, Ojeda SR, et al. Readthrough acetylcholinesterase (AChE-R) and regulated necrosis: pharmacological targets for the regulation of ovarian functions? Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1685. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bagnjuk K, Mayerhofer A. Human luteinized granulosa cells-A cellular model for the human corpus luteum. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:452. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jonczyk AW, Piotrowska-Tomala KK, Skarzynski DJ. Effects of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) on cell-death pathways in the bovine corpus luteum (CL) BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2167-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hojo T, Siemieniuch MJ, Lukasik K, Piotrowska-Tomala KK, Jonczyk AW, Okuda K, et al. Programmed necrosis - a new mechanism of steroidogenic luteal cell death and elimination during luteolysis in cows. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38211. doi: 10.1038/srep38211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Degterev A, Huang Z, Boyce M, Li Y, Jagtap P, Mizushima N, et al. Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(2):112–119. doi: 10.1038/nchembio711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Linkermann A, Green DR. Necroptosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):455–465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1310050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ning Y, Shi Y, Chen J, Song N, Cai J, Fang Y, et al. Necrostatin-1 attenuates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity through suppression of apoptosis and oxidative stress and retains klotho expression. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:384. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liang S, Lv ZT, Zhang JM, Wang YT, Dong YH, Wang ZG, et al. Necrostatin-1 attenuates trauma-induced mouse osteoarthritis and IL-1beta induced apoptosis via HMGB1/TLR4/SDF-1 in primary mouse chondrocytes. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1378. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bai L, Chang HM, Cheng JC, Chu G, Leung PCK, Yang G. Lithium Chloride increases COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in a human granulosa-lutein SVOG cell line via a GSK-3beta/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Endocrinology. 2017;158(9):2813–2825. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chang HM, Cheng JC, Huang HF, Shi FT, Leung PC. Activin A, B and AB decrease progesterone production by down-regulating StAR in human granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;412:290–301. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fang L, Li Y, Wang S, Li Y, Chang HM, Yi Y, et al. TGF-beta1 induces VEGF expression in human granulosa-lutein cells: a potential mechanism for the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(3):450–460. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0396-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Li H, Chang HM, Shi Z, Leung PCK. The p38 signaling pathway mediates the TGF-beta1-induced increase in type I collagen deposition in human granulosa cells. FASEB J. 2020;34(11):15591–15604. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001377R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Shao M, Zheng C, Ma X, Lyu F. Ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) inhibits dorsal root ganglion neuronal apoptosis by promoting the Ado/cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(6):1374. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang Y, Tang Y, Hang H, Wang M, Pang Y, Yu Y, et al. cAMP induces cell apoptosis in multiple myeloma and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(1):16–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yu L, Liu S, Zhou R, Sun H, Su X, Liu Q, et al. Atorvastatin inhibits neuronal apoptosis via activating cAMP/PKA/p-CREB/BDNF pathway in hypoxic-ischemic neonatal rats. FASEB J. 2022;36(4):e22263. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101654RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Breckwoldt M, Selvaraj N, Aharoni D, Barash A, Segal I, Insler V, et al. Expression of Ad4-BP/cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage enzyme and induction of cell death in long-term cultures of human granulosa cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2(6):391–400. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.6.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sirotkin AV, Balazi A, Chrenek P. The cAMP analogue, dbcAMP, affects rabbit ovarian cell proliferation, apoptosis, release of steroids and response to hormones. Folia Biol (Krakow) 2014;62(3):211–218. doi: 10.3409/fb62_3.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yacobi K, Tsafriri A, Gross A. Luteinizing hormone-induced caspase activation in rat preovulatory follicles is coupled to mitochondrial steroidogenesis. Endocrinology. 2007;148(4):1717–1726. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zwain IH, Amato P. cAMP-induced apoptosis in granulosa cells is associated with up-regulation of P53 and bax and down-regulation of clusterin. Endocr Res. 2001;27(1–2):233–249. doi: 10.1081/ERC-100107184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yacobi K, Wojtowicz A, Tsafriri A, Gross A. Gonadotropins enhance caspase-3 and -7 activity and apoptosis in the theca-interstitial cells of rat preovulatory follicles in culture. Endocrinology. 2004;145(4):1943–1951. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on personal request from the corresponding author.