Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 15;22:582. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03258-2

Table 3.

Assessment of the study quality

Qualitative studies
Study Total score /20 points Total score /100%
Charlton et al. [20] (2017) 20 100%
Charlton et al. [28] (2016) 17 85%
Adams & Tyson. [17] (2000) 16 80%
Johnston et al. [25] (2010b) 13 65%
Fischer [26] (2019) 6 30%
Häcker & Offterdinger [15] (2019) 4 20%
Hierholzer et al. (2013) [16] 4 20%
Quantitative studies
Study Total score /22 points Total score /100%
Aziz et al. [29] (2017) 22 100%
Schwickert et al. [31] (2016) 21 95%
Ardali et al. [21] (2019) 20 91%
Ariana et al. [14] (2012) 20 91%
Fleming & Brayne [22] (2008) 20 91%
Gurley et al. [18] (1996) 20 91%
Heinbüchner et al. [23] (2010) 20 91%
Reece & Simpson [19] (1996) 19 86%
Bourke et al. [30] (2008) 18 82%
Johnston et al. (2010a) [24] 18 82%
Alexander et al. [32] (1997) 17 77%
Simpson & Salkin [27] (1993) 12 55%