Table 3.
Assessment of the study quality
| Qualitative studies | ||
|---|---|---|
| Study | Total score /20 points | Total score /100% |
| Charlton et al. [20] (2017) | 20 | 100% |
| Charlton et al. [28] (2016) | 17 | 85% |
| Adams & Tyson. [17] (2000) | 16 | 80% |
| Johnston et al. [25] (2010b) | 13 | 65% |
| Fischer [26] (2019) | 6 | 30% |
| Häcker & Offterdinger [15] (2019) | 4 | 20% |
| Hierholzer et al. (2013) [16] | 4 | 20% |
| Quantitative studies | ||
| Study | Total score /22 points | Total score /100% |
| Aziz et al. [29] (2017) | 22 | 100% |
| Schwickert et al. [31] (2016) | 21 | 95% |
| Ardali et al. [21] (2019) | 20 | 91% |
| Ariana et al. [14] (2012) | 20 | 91% |
| Fleming & Brayne [22] (2008) | 20 | 91% |
| Gurley et al. [18] (1996) | 20 | 91% |
| Heinbüchner et al. [23] (2010) | 20 | 91% |
| Reece & Simpson [19] (1996) | 19 | 86% |
| Bourke et al. [30] (2008) | 18 | 82% |
| Johnston et al. (2010a) [24] | 18 | 82% |
| Alexander et al. [32] (1997) | 17 | 77% |
| Simpson & Salkin [27] (1993) | 12 | 55% |