. 2022 Feb 8;49(3):e2021GL096069. doi: 10.1029/2021GL096069

Table 1.

Site Characteristics and Summary of Regression Analysis

City	Lat. N (°)	Lon. E (°)	Köppen‐ Geiger climate	Avg. Temp. (°C)	Ann. Prec. (mm)	LCZ	F _v (%)	z _s (m)	z _H (m)	Start	End	Source	Drydown	Days	ET₀ (mm d⁻¹)	λ (day)	$t \frac{1}{2}$ (day)	S ₀ (mm)	Mean R ²
Amsterdam	52.37	4.89	Cfb	9.2	805	2	15	40	14	05–2018	10–2020	Ronda et al. (2017)	15	61	0.9–1.8 (1.4)	3.4–16.4 (4.5)	2.4–11.3 (3.1)	5.0–17.0 (7.3)	0.66
Amsterdam	52.37	4.89	Cfb	9.2	805	2	15	40	14	05–2018	10–2020	Steeneveld et al. (2019)	15	61	0.9–1.8 (1.4)	3.4–16.4 (4.5)	2.4–11.3 (3.1)	5.0–17.0 (7.3)	0.66
Arnhem	51.98	5.92	Cfb	9.4	778	2	12	23	11	05–2012	12–2016	Jacobs et al. (2015)	46	183	0.7–1.0 (0.8)	2.5–4.2 (3.0)	1.8–2.9 (2.1)	2.3–3.8 (3.0)	0.72
Basel (AESC)	47.55	7.6	Cfb	10	778	2	27	39	17	06–2009	12–2020	Lietzke et al. (2015)	120	500	0.8–1.0 (0.9)	4.2–5.6 (5.1)	2.9–4.0 (3.5)	3.6–4.9 (4.4)	0.75
Basel (KLIN)	47.56	7.58	Cfb	10	778	2	27	41	17	05–2004	12–2020	Schmutz et al. (2016)	158	661	1.0–1.2 (1.1)	4.9–6.8 (5.9)	3.4–4.7 (4.1)	5.4–7.8 (6.5)	0.72
Berlin (ROTH)	13.32	52.46	Cfb	9.1	570	6	56	40	17	06–2018	09–2020	Vulova et al. (2021)	7	33	0.4–0.9 (0.6)	4.8–11.0 (7.9)	3.3–7.6 (5.5)	1.3–9.9 (6.3)	0.67
Berlin (TUCC)	13.33	52.51	Cfb	9.1	570	5	31	56	20	07–2014	09–2020	Jin et al. (2020)	36	149	0.3–0.8 (0.5)	3.0–5.2 (3.7)	2.1–3.6 (2.6)	1.4–3.6 (3.0)	0.75
Berlin (TUCC)	13.33	52.51	Cfb	9.1	570	5	31	56	20	07–2014	09–2020	Vulova et al. (2021)	36	149	0.3–0.8 (0.5)	3.0–5.2 (3.7)	2.1–3.6 (2.6)	1.4–3.6 (3.0)	0.75
Helsinki	60.33	24.96	Dfb	5.1	650	6	54	31	20	01–2006	12–2018	Vesala et al. (2008)	45	202	1.2–1.8 (1.6)	3.7–6.1 (4.4)	2.5–4.2 (3.1)	6.0–11.0 (8.5)	0.78
Helsinki	60.33	24.96	Dfb	5.1	650	6	54	31	20	01–2006	12–2018	Karsisto et al. (2016)	45	202	1.2–1.8 (1.6)	3.7–6.1 (4.4)	2.5–4.2 (3.1)	6.0–11.0 (8.5)	0.78
Heraklion (HECKOR)	35.34	25.13	Csa	17.8	464	3	12	27	11.3	Nov‐16	May‐21	Stagakis et al. (2019)	5	24	0.4–2.0 (0.5)	1.8–13.3 (6.5)	1.3–9.2 (4.5)	1.5–13.2 (2.8)	0.51
Łódź	51.76	19.45	Dfb	7.9	564	5	31	37	11	07–2006	09–2015	Fortuniak et al. (2013)	57	261	0.9–1.6 (1.3)	4.0–5.4 (4.4)	2.8–3.7 (3.1)	3.8–6.9 (5.8)	0.66
Melbourne (Preston)	−37.73	145.01	Cfb	14.8	666	5	38	40	6	08–2003	11–2004	Coutts et al. (2007b)	2	9	1.6–2.1 (1.9)	2.6–13.2 (7.9)	1.8–9.2 (5.5)	5.5–21.3 (13.4)	0.69
Melbourne (Preston)	−37.73	145.01	Cfb	14.8	666	5	38	40	6	08–2003	11–2004	Coutts et al. (2007a)	2	9	1.6–2.1 (1.9)	2.6–13.2 (7.9)	1.8–9.2 (5.5)	5.5–21.3 (13.4)	0.69
Mexico City	19.4	−99.18	Cwb	15.9	625	2	6	37	9.7	06–2011	09–2012	Velasco et al. (2011)	8	49	0.7–1.5 (1.3)	5.5–16.5 (10.4)	3.8–11.5 (7.2)	5.8–21.9 (9.5)	0.65
Mexico City	19.4	−99.18	Cwb	15.9	625	2	6	37	9.7	06–2011	09–2012	Velasco et al. (2014)	8	49	0.7–1.5 (1.3)	5.5–16.5 (10.4)	3.8–11.5 (7.2)	5.8–21.9 (9.5)	0.65
Seoul	37.54	127.04	Dwa	11.9	1373	1	40	30	20	03–2015	02–2016	Hong et al. (2019)	10	59	0.6–2.0 (1.3)	2.3–9.9 (6.5)	1.6–6.9 (4.5)	3.3–10.7 (6.1)	0.56
Seoul	37.54	127.04	Dwa	11.9	1373	1	40	30	20	03–2015	02–2016	Hong et al. (2020)	10	59	0.6–2.0 (1.3)	2.3–9.9 (6.5)	1.6–6.9 (4.5)	3.3–10.7 (6.1)	0.56
Singapore	1.31	103.91	Af	26.8	2378	3	15	24	10	03–2013	03–2014	Velasco et al. (2013)	7	40	1.3–1.6 (1.4)	4.6–20.1 (8.2)	3.2–14.0 (5.7)	7.7–28.4 (11.3)	0.81
												Roth et al. (2017)
												Harshan et al. (2017)
Vancoucer	49.23	−123.08	Csb	9.9	1283	6	35	28	5	05–2008	07–2017	Christen et al. (2011)	67	308	1.2–1.4 (1.3)	6.5–8.9 (7.3)	4.5–6.2 (5.1)	7.1–9.5 (8.3)	0.54

Note. The climate statistics are long‐term means (1999–2019). The indicated ranges for the parameters are the 5th and 95th percentile of the median distribution from the bootstrapping re‐samples with in brackets the median itself (LCZ Stewart and Oke (2012): 1 = compact high‐rise, 2 = compact mid‐rise, 3 = compact low‐rise, 5 = open mid‐rise, 6 = open low‐rise, F _v: Surface fraction covered by vegetation in a 500 m radius around the measurement site, z _s: Height of sensors above ground level, z _H: Mean building height, ET₀: Initial evapotranspiration, λ: e‐folding timescale, $t \frac{1}{2}$ : Half‐life, S ₀: Effective, dynamic water storage capacity), R ²: Median goodness‐of‐fit.