Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul 30;19(11):2353–2360.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.053

Table 3.

Effectiveness of Text Message vs Live Call Primers Among Participants With No Prior Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for 3-Month FIT Completion Outcomesa

FIT completion 3 months after randomization
Unadjusted difference Adjusted
differenceb
Adjusted ORb
(reference =
text primer)
Text notification Live call notification




N (denominator) N (% FIT
completion)
N (denominator) N (% FIT
completion)
Percentage point
difference
Percentage point
difference
95% CI OR 95% CI
Intention to treat 1622 242 (14.92) 1203 232 (19.29) 4.37 3.27 0.35–6.18 1.27 1.03–1.55
Per-protocol 1c 1320 197 (14.92) 824 192 (23.30) 8.38 7.31 3.59–11.03 1.62 1.28–2.03
Per-protocol 2d 1320 197 (14.92) 438 133 (30.37) 15.45 14.87 9.64–20.09 2.37 1.82–3.09

CI, confidence interval; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; OR, odds ratio.

a

Combined July and October 2018 mailings; participants also received automated phone call and live phone calls delivered at discretion of care team.

b

Adjusted for clinic and mailing month (July vs October).

c

Included patients reached by text message or phone call (left message or spoke to patient).

d

Included patients reached by text message or phone call (spoke to patient).