Table 2.
Comparison of the Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics Between the External-Control Arm Derived From the IMblaze370 and the MORPHEUS-CRC Control and Experimental Arms.
IMblaze370 | MORPHEUS-CRC | P value (EC vs Atezo + Isa) | SMD (EC vs Atezo + Isa) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regorafenib (EC) | Atezo + Isa | Regorafenib | |||
Total Sample size | 28 | 15 | 13 | ||
Age at baseline, mean (SD) | 57.0 (9.6) | 52.2 (12.0) | 59.5 (10.5) | 0.178 | 0.445 |
Sex, No. (%) | 0.859 | 0.058 | |||
Female | 12 (42.9) | 6 (40.0) | 7 (53.8) | ||
Male | 16 (57.1) | 9 (60.0) | 6 (46.2) | ||
Race, No. (%) | 0.362 | 0.306 | |||
White | 21 (84.0) | 10 (71.4) | 8 (66.7) | ||
Non-White | 4 (16.0) | 4 (28.6) | 4 (33.3) | ||
Unknown | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
Region, No. (%) | 0.002 | 1.498 | |||
North America | 6 (21.4) | 11 (73.3) | 6 (46.2) | ||
Europe | 17 (60.7) | 1 (6.7) | 2 (15.4) | ||
Asia-Pacific | 5 (17.9) | 3 (20.0) | 5 (38.5) | ||
Time from metastatic diagnosis to baseline, No. (%) | 0.161 | 0.464 | |||
<18 months | 7 (25.0) | 7 (46.7) | 4 (30.8) | ||
≥18 months | 21 (75.0) | 8 (53.3) | 8 (61.5) | ||
Unknown | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
ECOG, No. (%) | 0.417 | 0.27 | |||
0 | 13 (46.4) | 5 (33.3) | 6 (46.2) | ||
1 | 15 (53.6) | 10 (66.7) | 7 (53.8) | ||
RAS, No. (%) | 0.924 | 0.032 | |||
Wild type | 10 (38.5) | 6 (40.0) | 8 (61.5) | ||
Mutant | 16 (61.5) | 9 (60.0) | 5 (38.5) | ||
Unknown | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
Liver metastases, No. (%) | 0.786 | 0.088 | |||
No | 10 (35.7) | 6 (40.0) | 4 (30.8) | ||
Yes | 18 (64.3) | 9 (60.0) | 9 (69.2) |
Statistical differences between the external-control and the MORPHEUS experimental arm (atezolizumab + isatuximab) were assessed using (1) P values calculated via the 2-tailed χ2 (or Fisher exact) test for all categorical variables or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the age variable, and (2) standardized mean difference.
Atezo atezolizumab, EC external control, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Isa isatuximab, RAS Rat Sarcoma proto-oncogene.