Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;28:101883. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101883

Table 3.

Barriers and facilitators to engaging with ERPOs by initiation approach.

n (%) Counselling patient or patient’s family Working with law enforcement Filing independently
Barriers
Lack of knowledge about the ERPO process 2513 (83.2) 2144 (71.0) 2406 (79.6)
Unsure what types of behaviors or threats would qualify for an ERPO 1729 (57.2) 1517 (50.2) 1690 (55.9)
Not enough time during patient encounter 1130 (37.4) 1089 (36.0) 1702 (56.3)
It may negatively affect my relationship with the patient 1032 (34.2) 1217 (40.3) 1066 (35.3)
Current reimbursement structures do not incentivize this 282 (9.3) 275 (9.1) 468 (15.5)
I have concerns about involving the court system 726 (24.0) 878 (29.1) 806 (26.7)
I have concerns about involving law enforcement 1338 (44.3)
Unable to attend hearing at courthouse 1726 (57.1)
Other 184 (6.1) 117 (3.9) 115 (3.8)
There are no barriers 157 (5.2) 164 (5.4) 69 (2.3)
I don't think clinicians should do this 24 (0.8) 42 (1.4) 77 (2.5)



Facilitators
Training for clinicians about ERPOs 2319 (76.8) 2095 (69.3) 2138 (70.8)
Being able to consult with a legal expert 1138 (37.7) 1225 (40.5) 1552 (51.4)
If there were a social worker or liaison to refer patient or patient's family to 2463 (81.5)
Having an informational pamphlet to give to patient or patient's family 1777 (58.8)
If there were a law enforcement ERPO liaison to work with 1938 (64.2)
If there were a crisis worker ERPO liaison to work with 2143 (70.9)
If there were an ERPO coordinator to help me with the paperwork 2155 (71.3)
Being able to attend the court hearing remotely 1489 (49.3)
Other 67 (2.2) 68 (2.3) 83 (2.7)
Nothing would make me feel more willing 79 (2.6) 147 (4.9) 312 (10.3)

Note: Missingness < 5% excluded from table.

Not all response barrier and facilitator options were appropriate for each ERPO type. The dashed cells above represent that options that were not offered for that ERPO initiation approach.