Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 12;9(4):2096–2106. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13886

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Agreement of the assessment of nutritional risk between the three nutritional indicators: MNA‐SF, GNRI, and CONUT. (A) Agreement between the GNRI and MNA‐SF scores for the judgement of nutritional risk. Scores of <98 and ≤11 are defined as patients at nutritional risk for the GNRI and MNA‐SF scores, respectively. GNRI vs. MNA‐SF: κ coefficient = 0.16. (B) Agreement between the GNRI and CONUT scores for the judgement of nutritional risk. Scores of <98 and ≥2 are defined as nutritional risk for the GNRI and CONUT scores, respectively. GNRI vs. CONUT: κ coefficient = 0.11. (C) Agreement between the MNA‐SF and CONUT scores for the judgement of nutritional risk. Scores of ≤11 and ≥2 are defined as nutritional risk for the MNA‐SF and CONUT scores, respectively. MNA‐SF vs. CONUT: κ coefficient = −0.09. CONUT, controlling nutritional status; GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; MNA‐SF, mini nutritional assessment‐short form.