Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 4;9:922637. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.922637

Table 2.

GRADE assessment for outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP vs control for total knee arthroplasty.

Outcomes No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations No. of patients
Relative effect (95% CI) Certaintya
PRP Control
Pain at POD 1 3 RCT No Seriousc No No No 80 81 MD −0.47 (−1.31, 0.38) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
Pain at POD 2 3 RCT No Seriousc No No No 80 81 MD −0.63 (−1.38, 0.13) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
Pain at 3 weeks 2 RCT No No No No No 40 41 MD −0.92 (−1.25, −0.60) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
Pain at 2 months 2 RCT No No No No No 40 41 MD −0.93 (−1.24, −0.63) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
ROM at POD 2 3 RCT No No No No Seriousd 110 112 MD 1.90 (−1.09, 4.87) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
ROM at POD 5 2 RCT No No No No No 27 34 MD 3.16 (−0.73, 7.06) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
ROM at 1 week 2 RCT Seriousb No No No No 129 226 MD −1.60 (−4.62, 1.42) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
ROM at 2 weeks 2 RCT Seriousb No No No Seriousd 159 258 MD −0.88 (−0.37, 1.94) ⊕⊕○○
Low
ROM at 6 weeks 2 RCT No Seriousc No No Seriousd 70 72 MD 3.88 (−5.23, 12.98) ⊕⊕○○
Low
WOMAC score at 6 weeks 2 RCT No Seriousc No No Seriousd 57 66 MD −2.37 (−9.78, 5.04) ⊕⊕○○
Low
WOMAC score at 2 months 2 RCT No Seriousc No No No 40 41 MD 2.90 (−3.97, 9.76) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
WOMAC score at 3 months 2 RCT No Seriousc No No No 57 66 MD −0.71 (−8.51, 7.08) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
WOMAC score at 6 months 2 RCT No No No No No 27 35 MD −0.69 (−1.65, 0.28) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
Length at hospital stay 3 RCT No Seriousc No No No 67 74 MD −1.27 (−2.90, 0.35) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
Hemoglobin drop 3 RCT Seriousb No No No Seriousd 179 279 MD −0.21 (−0.40, −0.02) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Total blood loss 3 RCT Seriousb No No No No 169 266 MD −56.50 (−131.13, 18.12) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
Wound infection 4 RCT No No No No Seriousd 110 113 RR 1.02 (0.93, 1.11) ⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
a

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High quality = we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.; Moderate quality = we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different; Low quality = our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect; Very low quality = we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

b

Downgraded one level for concerns with performance bias.

c

Downgraded one level for I2 > 50%.

d

Downgraded one level for publication bias.