Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 4;9:924850. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.924850

Table 4.

Cosmetic effect of surgical scars between three different approaches (median, first and third quartiles).

Parameter CLS TU-LESS RS Kruskal–Wallis test (P) CLS vs TU-LESS (P)a CLS vs RS (P)a TU-LESS vs RS (P)a
Scar spread 1(0, 1) 0 (0, 0) 2 (1, 2) 0.000 0.000 0.002 <0.001
Erythema 1(0, 1) 0 (0, 0) 1 (1, 1) 0.000 0.000 0.096 <0.001
Dyspigmentation 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 1) 0.305
Track marks or suture marks 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0.107
Hypertrophy / atrophy 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 0) 1 (1, 1) 0.000 0.000 0.000 <0.001
Overall impression 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0.5 (0, 1) 0.000 0.003 0.045 <0.001
Patient questions 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 1.000
Overall SCAR scores 3 (3, 3) 0 (0,1) 4(4, 4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 <0.001

a Means Mann-Whitney test.