TABLE 1.

Comparison of chloroplast genome features of the nine species of Crataegus and four other genera of Rosaceae (Eriobotrya, Malus, Rubus, and Spiraea).

Species	Size (bp)	LSC (bp)	SSC (bp)	IR (bp)	Genes number	GC (%)	Reference
C. oresbia	159,851	87,819	19,263	26,384	132	36.6	This study
C. scabrifolia	159,742	87,819	19,218	26,383	132	36.6	This study
C. chungtienesis	159,847	87,814	19,263	26,384	132	36.6	This study
C. marshallii	159,660	87,712	19,231	26,358	132	36.6	Liu et al. (2019a)
C. pinnatifida	159,898	87,599	19,218	26,540	129	36.6	He et al. (2020)
C. cuneata	159,730	87,778	19,183	26.384	129	36.6
C. kansuensis	159,865	87,815	19,231	26,384	132	36.6	Zhang X et al. (2020)
C. hupehensis	159,766	87,852	19,143	26,385	132	36.6	Hu et al. (2021b)
C. Pinnatifida var. major	159,654	87,747	19,138	26,384	131	36.6	Wu et al. (2021)
E. salwinensis	159,488	87,380	19,290	26,384	132	36.7	Liu et al. (2019b)
M. micromalus	159,834	87,950	19,176	26,409	129	36.6	Hu et al. (2017)
S. mongolica	155,949	84,375	18,894	26,354	131	36.7	Ma et al. (2021)
R. phoenicolasius	155,144	84,818	18,580	25,937	130	37.3	Zhang G et al. (2021)