Table 3.
Study 2 ANOVA results predicting prioritization of climate policy and ranking of climate policy
| Prioritization of climate policy | Ranking of climate policy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | ηp2 | p | F | ηp2 | p | |
| Partisan identification | 84.53 | 0.29 | < .001 | 56.78 | 0.21 | < .001 |
| Ingroup norms | 11.44 | 0.05 | .001 | 9.05 | 0.04 | .003 |
| Outgroup agrees | 0.15 | < 0.01 | .695 | 0.66 | < 0.01 | .418 |
| Ingroup * outgroup | 1.31 | 0.01 | .253 | 2.39 | 0.01 | .123 |
| Party * ingroup | 3.46 | 0.02 | .064 | 2.90 | 0.01 | .090 |
| Party * outgroup | 0.04 | < 0.01 | .838 | 1.14 | 0.01 | .286 |
| Party * ingroup * outgroup | 0.28 | < 0.01 | .599 | 0.02 | < 0.01 | .901 |