Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 4;77(1):186–196. doi: 10.1111/all.14906

TABLE 2.

Interaction between ECRS subgroup and dupilumab treatment effect versus placebo at weeks 24 and 52

Endpoint LS mean of treatment effect of dupilumab versus placebo (95% CI) p value
Non‐/mild ECRS Moderate/severe ECRS
Week 24
NPS −1.37 (−1.88, −0.86) −1.99 (−2.36, −1.61) 0.0945
NC −0.79 (−1.09, −0.48) −0.92 (−1.11, −0.72) 0.5073
LMK‐CT −3.82 (−5.07, −2.57) −5.59 (−6.38, −4.80) 0.0275
TSS −1.94 (−2.77, −1.11) −2.70 (−3.20, −2.20) 0.1205
UPSIT 8.45 (5.68, 11.23) 11.74 (9.83, 13.64) 0.0692
SNOT‐22 −14.78 (−21.03, −8.54) −19.16 (−23.49, −14.83) 0.2802
CRSwNP VAS −2.41 (−3.45, −1.36) −3.28 (−3.90, −2.67) 0.1462
Week 52
NPS −1.83 (−2.42, −1.23) −2.50 (−2.90, −2.10) 0.0911
NC −0.93 (−1.24, −0.62) −1.11 (−1.31, −0.91) 0.3374
LMK‐CT −5.39 (−6.97, −3.82) −6.64 (−7.61, −5.67) 0.1995
TSS −2.68 (−3.56, −1.80) −3.32 (−3.83, −2.81) 0.1768
UPSIT 8.35 (5.42, 11.28) 11.63 (9.75, 13.51) 0.0733
SNOT‐22 −18.65 (−24.88, −12.42) −23.92 (−28.20, −19.65) 0.1676
CRSwNP VAS −3.24 (−4.32, −2.16) −3.94 (−4.61, −3.28) 0.2723

ECRS subgroups were defined according to the JESREC algorithm (Figure 1).

Data were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with the corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/N‐ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions (except for the subgroups of Region and Territory) as covariates, plus the subgroup variable and the subgroup‐by‐treatment interaction.

Abbreviations: ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; CRSwNP, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; ECRS, eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis; JESREC, Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Rhinosinusitis; LMK‐CT, Lund‐Mackay score assessed by CT; LS, least squares; NC, nasal congestion; NPS, nasal polyp score; NSAID‐ERD, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug‐exacerbated respiratory disease; SNOT‐22,22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test; TSS, Total Symptom Score; UPSIT, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; VAS, visual analog scale.