Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;34(3):612–621. doi: 10.1111/den.14099

Table 2.

Procedure details

Plastic (n = 160) Integrated LAMS (n = 227) P‐value
Route of drainage, n (%)
Transesophageal 3 (1.9) 0 0.111
Transgastric 144 (90.0) 206 (90.7)
Transduodenal 13 (8.1) 21 (9.3)
Stent size and type, n (%)
Plastic
7‐Fr 139 (86.9) 14 (6.2) <0.001
10‐Fr 21 (13.1) 0
LAMS
15 mm 0 153 (67.4)
20 mm 0 60 (26.4)
Single‐gate technique, n (%) 123 (76.9) 204 (89.9) 0.001
Multi‐gate technique, n (%) 37 (23.1) 23 (10.1) 0.001
Dual modality technique, n (%) 24 (15.0) § 33 (14.5) 0.899
Procedure duration (min)
Mean (SD) 30.0 (21.6) 19.5 (12.9)
Median 22 16 0.001
IQR 15–33.5 9–28
Nutrition via enteral feeding tube, n (%) 58 (36.3) 77 (33.9) 0.636

Endoscopic necrosectomy was performed at index procedure in five patients in the plastic cohort and in seven patients in the integrated LAMS cohort.

Multi‐gate technique in the integrated LAMS group were using only LAMS in 15 patients and modified multi‐gate technique (using both LAMS and plastic stents) in eight patients.

§

Nasocystic drains were inserted in 17 patients and percutaneous drains were inserted in seven patients.

IQR, interquartile range; LAMS, lumen‐apposing metal stent; SD, standard deviation.