Table 5.
Frequency (%) of response regarding the degree to which element of survivorship is feasible (Round 2; N = 45).
| Consensus (direction) |
Very feasible (6–7) n (%) |
Moderately feasible (5) n (%) |
Neutral (4) n (%) |
Less feasible (3) n (%) |
Not feasible (1–2) n (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surveillance of recurrence and second cancers | High (VF‐MF) | 32 (71.1) | 8 (17.8) | 3 (6.7) | 2 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Up‐to‐date information | High (VF‐MF) | 27 (60.0) | 11 (24.4) | 5 (11.1) | 2 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Monitoring physical effects | High (VF‐MF) | 26 (57.8) | 15 (33.3) | 3 (6.7) | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Management of advanced symptoms | High (VF‐MF) | 25 (55.6) | 15 (33.3) | 3 (6.7) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (2.2) |
| Palliative care | High (VF‐MF) | 22 (48.9) | 15 (33.3) | 6 (13.3) | 2 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Advocacy | High (VF‐MF) | 20 (44.4) | 16 (35.6) | 4 (8.9) | 4 (8.9) | 1 (2.2) |
| Health promotion | Moderate (VF‐MF) | 19 (42.2) | 14 (31.1) | 8 (17.8) | 2 (4.4) | 2 (4.4) |
| Exercise, physical activity and nutrition | Low (VF‐MF) | 18 (40.0) | 12 (26.7) | 8 (17.8) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.7) |
| Family support for the patient | Low (VF‐MF) | 18 (40.0) | 13 (28.9) | 9 (20.0) | 2 (4.4) | 3 (6.7) |
| Shared and informed decision | Low (VF‐MF) | 17 (37.8) | 12 (26.7) | 11 (24.4) | 5 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Prostate cancer specialist nurses | Low (VF‐MF) | 17 (37.8) | 10 (22.2) | 9 (20.0) | 9 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Screening for psychosocial effects | Low (VF‐MF) | 17 (37.8) | 10 (22.2) | 12 (26.7) | 4 (8.9) | 2 (4.4) |
| Surveillance of comorbidities | Moderate (VF‐MF) | 16 (35.6) | 17 (37.8) | 8 (17.8) | 4 (8.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| Peer support | Low (MF‐N) | 15 (33.3) | 10 (22.2) | 16 (35.6) | 3 (6.7) | 1 (2.2) |
| Management of comorbidities | Low (VF‐MF) | 15 (33.3) | 13 (28.9) | 10 (22.2) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.7) |
| Empowerment | Low (VF‐MF) | 15 (33.3) | 12 (26.7) | 11 (24.4) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.7) |
| Person‐centred care | Low (VF‐MF) | 13 (28.9) | 18 (40.0) | 10 (22.2) | 4 (8.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| Managing physical effects | Moderate (VF‐MF) | 13 (28.9) | 22 (48.9) | 7 (15.6) | 2 (4.4) | 1 (2.2) |
| Multidisciplinary teams | Low (MF‐N) | 12 (26.7) | 14 (31.1) | 15 (33.3) | 2 (4.4) | 2 (4.4) |
| Psychosocial care | Low (MF‐N) | 11 (24.4) | 18 (40.0) | 13 (28.9) | 3 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Self‐management | Low (VF‐N) | 10 (22.2) | 18 (40.0) | 10 (22.2) | 6 (13.3) | 1 (2.2) |
| Care coordination | None (MF‐N) | 10 (22.2) | 13 (28.9) | 15 (33.3) | 6 (13.3) | 1 (2.2) |
| Maintaining intimate relationships | None (MF‐N) | 9 (20.0) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (26.7) | 7 (15.6) | 5 (11.1) |
| Access to care | None (MF‐N) | 8 (17.8) | 17 (37.8) | 14 (31.1) | 5 (11.1) | 1 (2.2) |
| Psychosocial care of family members | None (N‐LF) | 5 (11.1) | 8 (17.8) | 17 (37.8) | 12 (26.7) | 3 (6.7) |
| Financial assistance | None (N‐LF) | 1 (2.2) | 8 (17.8) | 15 (33.3) | 14 (31.1) | 7 (15.6) |
LF, Less feasible; MF, moderately feasible; N, neutral; VF, very feasible.