Table 2.
Descriptive analysis of features describing the 174 individuals in the Well-being data set. Shown are summaries of each of the features used in the study as well as the correlation of the feature with the extremity of self-identified conservatism. The survey questions as well as possible answers (in Likert scales) are provided in Section S1 (Supplemental Material).
| Demographic characteristic | Summary | Correlation | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 61 (35.1) | 0.180 | 0.017 |
| Age, range, median, and mean (SD) | 18–40, 20, 21.43(3.83) | −0.133 | 0.080 |
Likert responses
|
|||
| (1/2/3/4/5/6) | |||
| Education | 4/131/12/8/19 | −0.137 | 0.071 |
| Father's education | 32/20/60/8/54 | 0.113 | 0.136 |
| Mother's education | 29/25/76/13/31 | 0.081 | 0.285 |
| Father's conservatism | 5/28/33/41/37/30 | 0.349 | < 0.0001 |
| Mother's conservatism | 9/37/46/35/31/16 | 0.417 | < 0.0001 |
| Income | 164/9/1/0/0/0 | −0.051 | 0.500 |
| Parent’s income | 20/22/35/29/39/29 | 0.194 | 0.010 |
| Religiosity | 44/40/24/29/26/11 | 0.279 | 0.0001 |
| Origin city conservatism | 1/17/44/57/40/15 | 0.054 | 0.472 |
| Current city conservatism | 16/64/64/23/6/1 | −0.007 | 0.931 |
| Conservatism | 24/52/49/36/9/4 | 1.000 | 0 |