Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 4;12:865292. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.865292

Table 1.

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

Unadjusted sIPTW PSM
Characteristic Palbociclib + letrozole(n=330) Letrozole(n=221) Standardized difference Palbociclib + letrozole(n=321) Letrozole(n=269) Standardized difference Palbociclib + letrozole(n=194) Letrozole(n=194) Standardized difference
Age, y
 Mean (SD) 65.7 (10.2) 70.0 (10.6) –0.410 67.0 (10.4) 67.7 (11.5) –0.063 66.7 (11.0) 68.9 (10.6) –0.201
 Median (IQR) 66.0 (15.0) 71.0 (18.0) 67.0 (15.0) 68.0 (17.0) 67.0 (17.0) 69.0 (17.0)
 18−49 24 (7.3) 10 (4.5) 0.117 20 (6.3) 14 (5.1) 0.049 16 (8.2) 10 (5.2) 0.124
 50−64 121 (36.7) 56 (25.3) 0.247 106 (32.9) 90 (33.4) –0.010 60 (30.9) 54 (27.8) 0.068
 65−74 115 (34.8) 64 (29.0) 0.127 106 (33.0) 85 (31.7) 0.027 63 (32.5) 61 (31.4) 0.022
 75+ 70 (21.2) 91 (41.2) –0.441 89 (27.8) 80 (29.7) –0.042 55 (28.4) 69 (35.6) –0.155
Race/ethnicity*
 White 219 (66.4) 146 (66.1) 0.006 212 (66.0) 178 (66.2) –0.003 106 (54.6) 131 (67.5) –0.267
 Black 20 (6.1) 26 (11.8) –0.201 21 (6.4) 26 (9.7) –0.122 20 (10.3) 16 (8.2) 0.071
 Asian 3 (0.9) 5 (2.3) –0.109 3 (1.0) 5 (1.9) –0.080 3 (1.5) 4 (2.1) –0.039
 Hispanic or Latino 9 (2.7) 3 (1.4) 0.097 8 (2.5) 6 (2.0) 0.032 4 (2.1) 3 (1.5) 0.039
 Other/Unknown 79 (23.9) 41 (18.6) 0.132 77 (24.0) 54 (20.1) 0.095 61 (31.4) 40 (20.6) 0.249
Practice type*
 Academic 17 (5.2) 8 (3.6) 0.075 15 (4.8) 10 (3.7) 0.052 8 (4.1) 7 (3.6) 0.027
 Community 313 (94.8) 213 (96.4) 305 (95.2) 259 (96.3) 186 (95.9) 187 (96.4)
Insurance type
 Commercial Health Plan + any other 69 (20.9) 55 (24.9) –0.095 73 (22.6) 61 (22.7) –0.001 32 (24.1) 34 (25.6) –0.035
 Commercial Health
 Plan
85 (25.8) 37 (16.7) 0.222 77 (23.7) 50 (18.5) 0.127 31 (23.3) 26 (19.5) 0.092
 Medicare 12 (3.6) 13 (5.9) –0.106 16 (5.0) 13 (4.9) 0.005 5 (3.8) 4 (3.0) 0.042
 Medicaid 4 (1.2) 2 (0.9) 0.030 4 (1.2) 3 (1.1) 0.017 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 0
 Other payer type 160 (48.5) 114 (51.6) –0.062 153 (47.4) 142 (52.8) –0.109 64 (48.1) 68 (51.1) –0.060
Disease stage at diagnosis*
 I 38 (11.5) 22 (10.0) 0.050 38 (11.7) 24 (8.8) 0.097 25 (12.9) 21 (10.8) 0.064
 II 86 (26.1) 42 (19.0) 0.170 79 (24.8) 56 (20.9) 0.093 37 (19.1) 39 (20.1) –0.026
 III 42 (12.7) 26 (11.8) 0.029 40 (12.4) 34 (12.6) –0.005 27 (13.9) 23 (11.9) 0.062
 IV 122 (37.0) 90 (40.7) –0.077 118 (36.7) 112 (41.6) –0.102 70 (31.6) 78 (40.2) –0.085
 Not documented 42 (12.7) 41 (18.6) –0.161 46 (14.4) 43 (16.0) –0.047 35 (18.0) 33 (17.0) 0.027
ECOG performance status*
 0 126 (38.2) 54 (24.4) 0.300 105 (32.8) 89 (33.1) –0.007 57 (29.4) 54 (27.8) 0.034
 1 70 (21.2) 45 (20.4) 0.021 68 (21.2) 55 (20.6) 0.015 44 (22.7) 41 (21.1) 0.037
 2, 3, or 4 18 (5.5) 34 (15.4) –0.329 25 (7.9) 30 (11.3) –0.113 18 (9.3) 22 (11.3) –0.068
 Not documented 116 (35.2) 88 (39.8) –0.097 122 (38.1) 94 (35.0) 0.064 75 (38.7) 77 (39.7) –0.021
Brain metastases 14 (4.2) 14 (6.3) –0.094 13 (4.1) 22 (8.2) –0.170 10 (5.2) 14 (7.2) –0.086
Time from initial diagnosis to metastatic diagnosis,* y
 De novo 122 (37.0) 90 (40.7) –0.077 118 (36.7) 112 (41.6) –0.102 70 (36.1) 78 (40.2) –0.085
 ≤1 7 (2.1) 4 (1.8) 0.022 7 (2.0) 6 (2.1) –0.002 4 (2.1) 4 (2.1) 0
 >1–≤5 47 (14.2) 25 (11.3) 0.088 47 (14.7) 30 (11.3) 0.101 24 (12.4) 23 (11.9) 0.016
 >5 154 (46.7) 102 (46.2) 0.010 149 (46.5) 121 (45.0) 0.032 96 (49.5) 89 (45.9) 0.072
Number of metastatic sites*,†
 1 66 (20.0) 51 (23.1) –0.075 74 (23.0) 46 (17.1) 0.147 43 (22.2) 37 (19.1) 0.077
 2 119 (36.1) 88 (39.8) –0.078 117 (36.6) 107 (39.8) –0.067 82 (42.3) 81 (41.8) 0.010
 3 91 (27.6) 56 (25.3) 0.051 83 (25.7) 76 (28.4) –0.061 43 (22.2) 52 (26.8) –0.108
 4 36 (10.9) 17 (7.7) 0.111 30 (9.5) 25 (9.4) 0.005 17 (8.8) 15 (7.7) 0.038
 ≥5 18 (5.5) 9 (4.1) 0.065 17 (5.2) 14 (5.2) –0.003 9 (4.6) 9 (4.6) 0
Duration of follow-up, mo
 Mean (SD) 23.6 (12.3) 21.9 (14.3) 0.124 23.5 (12.3) 21.6 (15.7) 0.133 23.5 (12.4) 21.5 (14.5) 0.145
 Median (IQR) 22.6 (17.3) 22.1 (21.5) 22.6 (17.7) 22.1 (21.2) 22.3 (17.7) 20.6 (22.6)

All data are n (%) unless otherwise noted.

The balance in prognostic baseline characteristics was determined using a standardized difference approach, with a standardized difference of ≥0.10, considered indicative of practical significance (19). The total patient population for the different subgroups varied owing to the use of sIPTW. Therefore, the total number for each subgroup may not have equaled the number in the treatment arm (owing to rounding errors or differences in categorization). Percentages were based on the number of patients reported within each subgroup.

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IQR, interquartile range; PSM, propensity score matching; sIPTW, stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting.

*Variable used in the propensity score matching model; de novo vs not de novo were used as categories for initial diagnosis to metastatic diagnosis.

Multiple metastasis at the same site were counted as 1 site.