Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 4;12:865292. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.865292

Table 2.

Subsequent second-line anticancer treatments and disease progression in the second-line treatment.

Patients with liver metastasis Patients with lung metastasis
Treatments, n (%) Palbociclib + letrozole (n=123) Letrozole (n=75) Palbociclib + letrozole (n=257) Letrozole (n=171)
First-line treatment only* 49 (39.8) 28 (37.3) 125 (48.6) 67 (39.1)
Any second-line treatment received 74 (60.2) 47 (62.7) 132 (51.4) 104 (60.8)
 CDK4/6 inhibitor 22 (29.8) 23 (48.9) 48 (36.4) 63 (60.6)
 Chemotherapy 26 (35.1) 6 (12.8) 37 (28.0) 14 (13.5)
 Endocrine therapy alone 8 (10.8) 14 (29.8) 24 (18.2) 20 (19.2)
 Other anticancer treatment 21 (28.4) 7 (14.9) 32 (24.2) 15 (14.4)
Second-line disease progression 37 (50.0) 20 (42.6) 69 (52.3) 47 (45.2)

CDK4/6=cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6.

*Includes patients who continued treatment, died, or were censored in the first-line setting.

Patients could have received >1 category of second-line treatment.