Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 9;12(11):2129–2144. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13689

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Two‐dimensional projection (XY) comparing the ALPACA landmark predictions (light blue) with other methods (red) after joint GPA superimposition. Crosshairs indicate the consensus shapes of each method under the joint superimposition. Other methods are, in order: (a) Manual landmarking (Mus); (b) Diffeomorphic approach described in Maga et al. (2017) (Mus); (c) Manual landmarking after bias correction (Mus); (d) Manual landmarking (Pan); (e) Manual landmarking (Gorilla); and (f) Manual landmarking (Pongo)