Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;23(3):891–909. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab002

Table 2.

Simulation results of the misspecified model. Average errors in estimating Inline graphic and Inline graphic are quantified as the Hamming distance between the estimated and true matrices, normalized by the respective total number of elements. The numbers in the parentheses are standard deviations. The competing methods are low rank approximation (LRA), non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF), zero-inflated Poisson factor model (ZIPFM), and two-step multinomial matrix factorization (TSMF).

  MMF LRA NNMF ZIPFM TSMF
Error rate Inline graphic 0.323 0.301 0.351 0.368 0.329
(0.072) (0.044) (0.062) (0.015) (0.083)
Error rate Inline graphic 0.157 0.293 0.319 0.382 0.191
(0.036) (0.032) (0.023) (0.019) (0.047)