Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;45(1):12–22. doi: 10.1111/pce.14193

Table 2.

δ2Hne values of plant‐derived sugar, starch and cellulose from leaf material

δ2Hne Starch [‰] δ2Hne Sugar [‰] δ2Hne Cellulose [‰] Difference in δ2Hne [‰]
Species Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Cell‐starch Sugar‐starch Cell‐sugar
C 3 Cannabis sativa −125.0 27.1 −99.4 15.9 −56.1 6.4 68.9 25.6 43.3
Solanum cheesmaniae −147.0 17.2 −99.4 6.9 −78.4 6.1 68.6 47.6 21
Salvia hispanica −133.9 23.3 −75.9 9.1 −50.0 18.1 83.8 58.0 25.8
Abelmoschus esculentus −126.1 12.3 −110.5 7.3 −63.4 10.6 62.7 15.5 47.1
Hordeum vulgare −76.7 a a −74.8 5.1 −59.0 4.9 17.7 1.9 15.8
mean −121.7 20.0 −92.0 8.9 −61.4 9.2 60.3 29.7 30.6
C 4 Zea mays −60.6 a a −44.8 2.6 −7.7 9.3 52.9 15.8 37.1
Sorghum bicolor −61.2 a a −20.2 3.7 −25.3 6.7 35.9 41.0 −5.1
mean −60.9 a −32.5 3.2 −16.5 8.0 44.4 28.4 16.0
CAM Portulaca grandiflora −24.8 33.7 −12.8 15.1 14.9 5.7 39.7 11.9 27.7
Kalanchoe daigremontiana −18.0 2.3 −13.2 3.6 −5.6 5.3 12.4 4.8 7.6
Phalaenopsis 12.1 a a 44.2 2.2 23.3 1.2 11.2 32.1 −20.9
mean −10.2 18.0 6.0 6.9 10.9 4.0 21.1 16.3 4.8

Note: Plant species differing in photosynthetic pathways were grown under the same controlled conditions.

a

Due to low yields, starch samples of three replicates were pooled for H. vulgare, Z. mays, S. bicolor and Phalaenopsis, and thus could be only measured once.