Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;44(18):3506–3515. doi: 10.1002/jssc.202100263

TABLE 5.

The quality of samples was sorted by technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method

Sample Di + Di Ci Ranking
S1 0.849110960 0.717434465 0.457972334 4
S2 0.930204412 0.782569992 0.456901966 5
S3 1.271828347 0.169707273 0.117726729 11
S4 1.274048736 0.116901388 0.084044270 13
S5 1.086773053 0.298493603 0.215477361 8
S6 1.216034220 0.168087743 0.121439980 10
S7 1.278729447 0.083896007 0.061569382 14
S8 0.858530763 0.712162700 0.453406547 6
S9 0.807636762 0.687112348 0.459684066 3
S10 1.248791537 0.126865735 0.092221906 12
S11 0.605983607 1.028654198 0.629285702 1
S12 0.680241946 0.902884369 0.570317327 2
S13 0.977235632 0.740476037 0.431082847 7
S14 1.199897424 0.181822426 0.131591383 9