Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;29(1):286–294. doi: 10.1111/ene.15129

TABLE 3.

Corneal sensitivity and confocal microscopy parameters in controls and diabetic patients with no, mild and moderate‐to‐severe pain

Controls n = 38 No pain n = 43 Mild pain n = 34 Moderate‐to‐severe pain n = 41 ANCOVA
NCCA (mbar) 0.6 ± 0.19 0.89 ± 0.20 0.65 ± 0.24 1.63 ± 0.24 b , c F(2, 113) = 4.2, p = 0.007
CNFD (no./mm2) 33.56 ± 1.25 23.67 ± 1.15 c 20.85 ± 1.29c 17.27 ± 1.18 b , c F(2, 113) = 6.3, p = 0.003
CNBD (no./mm2) 92.75 ± 5.09 56.47 ± 4.56 c 45.20 ± 5.14 c 40.60 ± 4.71 c F(2, 113) = 2.9, p = 0.06
CNFL (mm/mm2) 27.06 ± 1.13 22.47 ± 1.03 c 20.21 ± 1.17 c 15.82 ± 1.07 b , c F(2, 113) = 8.18, p < 0.0001

Data are adjusted for age and presented as estimated marginal means ± SEM using ANCOVA (LSD correction). The ANCOVA (LSD correction) test is done between groups of patients.

Abbreviations: CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFD, corneal nerve fibre density; CNFL, corneal nerve fibre length; NCCA, non‐contact corneal aesthesiometer.

a

Significant compared to no pain.

b

Significant difference compared to mild pain.

c

Significant difference compared to controls.