Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0271580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271580

Table 4. The overall evidence quality for outcome measure.

Group N Participants Absolute effect [95%CI] Certainty assessment Certainty Importance
I C Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations
Acupuncture vs. Usual care Time to First Flatus
15 580 582 SMD-1.14 [-1.54, -0.73] Seriousa Seriousa No No No Low Critical
Time to First Defecation
12 488 492 SMD-1.31 [-1.88, -0.74] Seriousa Seriousa No No No Low Critical
Time to Bowel Sounds Recovery
10 401 399 SMD-1.57 [-2.14, -1.01] Seriousa Seriousa No No No Low Critical
Length of hospital stay
8 303 302 MD-1.68 [-2.55, -0.80] No Seriousa No No No Moderate Importance
Acupuncture vs. Sham acupuncture Time to First Flatus
4 162 164 SMD-0.81 [-1.40, -0.23] Seriousa Seriousa No Seriousc No Very Low Critical
Time to First Defecation
3 132 134 SMD-0.34 [-0.58, -0.10] Seriousa No No Seriousc No Low Critical
Time to Bowel Sounds Recovery
3 107 109 SMD-1.03 [-1.14, -0.43] Seriousa Seriousa No Seriousc No Very Low Critical
Length of hospital stay
3 104 105 MD-0.99 [-0.26, 0.08] No Seriousa No Seriousc No Low Importance

Abbreviations: N, No. of studies; I, intervention; C, control; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; SMD, standard mean difference.

a. Downgraded due to serious risk of bias: high risk of performance bias and unclear risk of selection bias and detection bias.

b. Downgraded due to substantial heterogeneity.

c. Downgraded due to small sample size.