Table 4. The overall evidence quality for outcome measure.
Group | N | Participants | Absolute effect [95%CI] | Certainty assessment | Certainty | Importance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | C | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | |||||
Acupuncture vs. Usual care | Time to First Flatus | ||||||||||
15 | 580 | 582 | SMD-1.14 [-1.54, -0.73] | Seriousa | Seriousa | No | No | No | Low | Critical | |
Time to First Defecation | |||||||||||
12 | 488 | 492 | SMD-1.31 [-1.88, -0.74] | Seriousa | Seriousa | No | No | No | Low | Critical | |
Time to Bowel Sounds Recovery | |||||||||||
10 | 401 | 399 | SMD-1.57 [-2.14, -1.01] | Seriousa | Seriousa | No | No | No | Low | Critical | |
Length of hospital stay | |||||||||||
8 | 303 | 302 | MD-1.68 [-2.55, -0.80] | No | Seriousa | No | No | No | Moderate | Importance | |
Acupuncture vs. Sham acupuncture | Time to First Flatus | ||||||||||
4 | 162 | 164 | SMD-0.81 [-1.40, -0.23] | Seriousa | Seriousa | No | Seriousc | No | Very Low | Critical | |
Time to First Defecation | |||||||||||
3 | 132 | 134 | SMD-0.34 [-0.58, -0.10] | Seriousa | No | No | Seriousc | No | Low | Critical | |
Time to Bowel Sounds Recovery | |||||||||||
3 | 107 | 109 | SMD-1.03 [-1.14, -0.43] | Seriousa | Seriousa | No | Seriousc | No | Very Low | Critical | |
Length of hospital stay | |||||||||||
3 | 104 | 105 | MD-0.99 [-0.26, 0.08] | No | Seriousa | No | Seriousc | No | Low | Importance |
Abbreviations: N, No. of studies; I, intervention; C, control; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; SMD, standard mean difference.
a. Downgraded due to serious risk of bias: high risk of performance bias and unclear risk of selection bias and detection bias.
b. Downgraded due to substantial heterogeneity.
c. Downgraded due to small sample size.