Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;18(7):e1010283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010283

Table 2. Overview of individually best fitting model variants.

N indicates the number of participants best described by the variant described in the row. The top variant (A) coincided with the GLA model. Note that all individually best fitting models had some form of gaze-dependence (blue shaded cells, mostly alternative-wise gaze-discount). "n.d." denotes variants where comparison mechanisms were not distinguishable by the analysis. The last two columns show observed mean (± s.d. if applicable) RST of participants best described by each variant, for attraction and compromise trials, respectively.

N GDAlt GDAtt Leak Inhibition Integration Comparison Attr. RST Comp. RST
A 17 Yes No Constant None Multiplicative n.d. 0.51 ± 0.07 0.55 ± 0.08
B 9 Yes No Constant Distance Multiplicative Comparative 0.75 ± 0.12 0.56 ± 0.16
C 4 Yes No Constant None Additive n.d. 0.52 ± 0.05 0.42 ± 0.14
D 3 No No Gaze None Multiplicative Independent 0.59 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.11
E 2 No No Constant Gaze Multiplicative Independent 0.50 ± 0.00 0.51 ± 0.02
F 1 Yes No Gaze Distance Multiplicative Comparative 0.72 0.81
G 1 Yes No Gaze Constant Multiplicative Comparative 0.51 0.30
H 1 Yes Yes Constant Distance Multiplicative Independent 0.46 0.13
I 1 Yes No Constant Gaze Multiplicative Comparative 0.47 0.56
J 1 Yes No Gaze None Multiplicative Comparative 0.43 0.49