Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;29(1):225–236. doi: 10.1111/ene.15066

TABLE 6.

Prospective relationships of baseline Diet Habits Questionnaire scores and meat and dairy consumption with subsequent change in Patient‐determined Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score severity, baseline to 2.5‐year review

n/N (%) Decrease disability Increase disability
Decrease Stable Increase aRR1 aRR2 aRR1 aRR2
DHQ score a
32–70 32/267 (12.0) 198/267 (74.2) 37/267 (13.9) 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
>70–80 21/302 (7.0) 251/302 (83.1) 30/302 (9.9) 0.70 (0.42, 1.15) 0.77 (0.45, 1.31) 0.68 (0.44, 1.05) 0.77 (0.48, 1.21)
>80–89 27/351 (7.7) 301/351 (85.8) 23/351 (6.6) 0.85 (0.53, 1.36) 1.03 (0.65, 1.64) 0.49 (0.30, 0.80) 0.59 (0.35, 0.99)
>89–100 25/385 (6.5) 331/385 (86.0) 29/385 (7.5) 0.83 (0.51, 1.36) 1.02 (0.62, 1.67) 0.56 (0.36, 0.88) 0.64 (0.40, 1.02)
Trend p = 0.61 p = 0.73 p = 0.009 p = 0.048
Consume meat? b
No 29/523 (5.5) 461/523 (88.2) 33/523 (6.3) 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Yes 76/781 (9.7) 619/781 (79.3) 86/781 (11.0) 1.28 (0.85, 1.92) 1.17 (0.78, 1.74) 1.86 (1.25, 2.75) 1.76 (1.17, 2.63)
p = 0.23 p = 0.45 p = 0.002 p = 0.006
Consume dairy? c
No 41/565 (7.3) 483/565 (85.5) 41/565 (7.3) 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Yes 64/730 (8.8) 589/730 (80.7) 77/730 (10.6) 1.00 (0.69, 1.43) 0.93 (0.75, 1.34) 1.47 (1.02, 2.11) 1.36 (0.93, 1.99)
p = 0.98 p = 0.71 p = 0.039 p = 0.11

Analyses by log‐multinomial regression. Model 1 adjusted for baseline and 2.5‐year ongoing symptoms due to recent relapse. Model 2 further adjusted for age, sex, multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotype, socioeconomic status, and baseline clinically significant fatigue.

Results in boldface denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: aRR, adjusted risk ratio; DHQ, Diet Habits Questionnaire; P‐MSSS, Patient‐determined MS Severity Score.

a

Analyses for DHQ score vs. disability in model 1 includes 1,291 people, thus excluding 55 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,207 people, thus excluding 139 people with missing data.

b

Analyses for meat consumption vs. disability in model 1 includes 1,290 people, thus excluding 56 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,206 people, thus excluding 140 people with missing data.

c

Analyses for dairy consumption vs. disability in Model 1 includes 1,281 people, thus excluding 65 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,201 people, thus excluding 145 people with missing data.