TABLE 7.
n (%) | aβ (95% CI) a | aβ (95% CI) b | |
---|---|---|---|
DHQ score a | |||
32–70 | 267 (20.5) | 0.00 [Reference] | 0.00 [Reference] |
>70–80 | 302 (23.1) | −0.13 (−0.36, 0.09) | −0.12 (−0.36, 0.11) |
>80–89 | 351 (26.9) | −0.31 (−0.53, −0.09) | −0.30 (−0.53, −0.07) |
>89–100 | 385 (29.5) | −0.27 (−0.49, −0.06) | −0.27 (−0.49, −0.04) |
Trend | p = 0.006 | p = 0.010 | |
Consume meat? b | |||
No | 523 (40.1) | 0.00 [Reference] | 0.00 [Reference] |
Yes | 781 (59.9) | 0.19 (0.04, 0.35) | 0.18 (0.02, 0.33) |
p = 0.014 | p = 0.031 | ||
Consume dairy? c | |||
No | 565 (43.6) | 0.00 [Reference] | 0.00 [Reference] |
Yes | 730 (56.4) | 0.19 (0.04, 0.34) | 0.19 (0.04, 0.35) |
p = 0.015 | p = 0.017 |
Analyses by linear regression. Model 1 adjusted for baseline and 2.5‐year ongoing symptoms due to recent relapse and baseline P‐MSSS. Model 2 further adjusted for age, sex, multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotype, socioeconomic status, and baseline clinically significant fatigue.
Results in boldface denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: DHQ, Diet Habits Questionnaire; P‐MSSS, Patient‐deterimined MS Severity Score.
Analyses for DHQ score vs. disability in Model 1 includes 1,291 people, thus excluding 55 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,207 people, thus excluding 139 people with missing data.
Analyses for meat consumption vs. disability in model 1 includes 1,290 people, thus excluding 56 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,206 people, thus excluding 140 people with missing data.
Analyses for dairy consumption vs. disability in Model 1 includes 1,281 people, thus excluding 65 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,201 people, thus excluding 145 people with missing data.