Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;29(1):225–236. doi: 10.1111/ene.15066

TABLE 7.

Prospective relationships of baseline Diet Habits Questionnaire scores and meat and dairy consumption with subsequent change in continuous Patient‐determined Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score, baseline to 2.5‐year review

n (%) aβ (95% CI) a aβ (95% CI) b
DHQ score a
32–70 267 (20.5) 0.00 [Reference] 0.00 [Reference]
>70–80 302 (23.1) −0.13 (−0.36, 0.09) −0.12 (−0.36, 0.11)
>80–89 351 (26.9) −0.31 (−0.53, −0.09) −0.30 (−0.53, −0.07)
>89–100 385 (29.5) −0.27 (−0.49, −0.06) −0.27 (−0.49, −0.04)
Trend p = 0.006 p = 0.010
Consume meat? b
No 523 (40.1) 0.00 [Reference] 0.00 [Reference]
Yes 781 (59.9) 0.19 (0.04, 0.35) 0.18 (0.02, 0.33)
p = 0.014 p = 0.031
Consume dairy? c
No 565 (43.6) 0.00 [Reference] 0.00 [Reference]
Yes 730 (56.4) 0.19 (0.04, 0.34) 0.19 (0.04, 0.35)
p = 0.015 p = 0.017

Analyses by linear regression. Model 1 adjusted for baseline and 2.5‐year ongoing symptoms due to recent relapse and baseline P‐MSSS. Model 2 further adjusted for age, sex, multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotype, socioeconomic status, and baseline clinically significant fatigue.

Results in boldface denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: DHQ, Diet Habits Questionnaire; P‐MSSS, Patient‐deterimined MS Severity Score.

a

Analyses for DHQ score vs. disability in Model 1 includes 1,291 people, thus excluding 55 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,207 people, thus excluding 139 people with missing data.

b

Analyses for meat consumption vs. disability in model 1 includes 1,290 people, thus excluding 56 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,206 people, thus excluding 140 people with missing data.

c

Analyses for dairy consumption vs. disability in Model 1 includes 1,281 people, thus excluding 65 people with missing data. Model 2 includes 1,201 people, thus excluding 145 people with missing data.