Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 6;98(5):E677–E686. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29892

TABLE 3.

Optical coherence tomography entire stent segment findings

BP‐EES DP‐EES p‐value
Baseline post‐PCI 38 lesions 45 lesions
Minimum stent area, mm2 6.46 ± 2.53 5.82 ± 2.19 0.22
Mean stent area, mm2 8.04 ± 2.68 7.50 ± 2.32 0.32
Conventional stent expansion, % 77.5 ± 14.1 71.8 ± 12.9 0.06
Minimum H‐K stent expansion, % 81.2 ± 14.0 74.9 ± 12.5 0.052
Eccentricity index 0.81 ± 0.07 0.81 ± 0.08 0.96
Asymmetry index 0.28 ± 0.10 0.31 ± 0.10 0.27
Lipidic plaque behind stent 35 (92.1) 41 (91.1) 1.00
Follow‐up 40 lesions 46 lesions
Minimum lumen area, mm2 5.92 ± 2.43 5.27 ± 2.24 0.20
Percent NIH area at MLA site, % 15.2 ± 11.5 13.2 ± 12.2 0.45
Percent NIH volume, % 7.5 ± 4.7 7.3 ± 5.3 0.85
NIH thickness, μm 70.0 ± 33.9 67.2 ± 33.9 0.71a

Note: Values are n (%), mean ± SD.

Abbreviations: BP‐EES, bioresorbable polymer everolimus‐eluting stent; DP‐EES, durable polymer everolimus‐eluting stent; H‐K, Huo‐Kassab; MLA, minimum lumen area; NIH, neointimal hyperplasia; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

a

Strut level comparison using each individual strut with clustering adjusting.