Abstract
Reactions of benzyl potassium species with CO are shown to proceed via transient carbene‐like intermediates that can undergo either dimerization or further CO propagation. In a sterically unhindered case, formal dimerization of the carbene is the dominant reaction pathway, as evidenced by the isolation of ((Ph3SiO)(PhCH2)C)2 2 and PhCH2C(O)CH(OH)CH2Ph 3. Reactions with increasingly sterically encumbered reagents show competitive reaction pathways involving intermolecular dimerization leading to species analogous to 2 and 3 and those containing newly‐formed five‐membered rings tBu2C6H2(C(OSiR3)C(OSiR3)CH2) (R=Me 6, Ph 7). Even further encumbered reagents proceed to either dimerize or react with additional CO to give a ketene‐like intermediates, thus affording a 7‐membered tropolone derivative 14 or the dione (3,5‐tBu2C6H3)3C6H2CH2C(O))2 15.
Keywords: C−C bond formation, carbon monoxide, radical, carbene, tropolone
Reactions of benzyl potassium species with CO proceed via transient carbene‐like intermediates, resulting in dimerization. Increasingly sterically encumbered benzyl potassium reagents show competitive reaction pathways involving intramolecular cyclizations affording five‐membered rings, while even further encumbrance results the competitive with reaction with additional CO leading to a 7‐membered tropolone derivative.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is used as a fundamental C1 building block for the synthesis of valuable organic products including hydrocarbons (Fischer–Tropsch process), [1] aldehydes (Gattermann–Koch reaction [2] and oxo synthesis [3] ), acetic acid, [4] esters [5] among others. [6] These processes are mediated by transition metal catalysts and indeed the chemistry of CO has been dominated by transition metal reagents. Despite lesser attention, reactions of CO with alkali metal reagents have a long history. In a 1970 study, Jutzi and Schröder [7] reacted phenyl‐ and n‐butyllithium with CO and silylhalides to generate β‐ketosilanes, while the sterically bulky t‐butyllithium generated the silyl ketone. In the 1980s, Nudelman and Vitale [8] described the carbonylation of phenyl lithium in the presence of alkyl halides, afforded diarylalkylcarbinols, while bulkier aryl lithium regents afforded 1,2‐diketone diaryl derivatives. [9] In 1982, Seyferth and Weinstein [10] used alkyl lithium reagents, CO and Me3SiCl to prepare a series of acyltrimethylsilanes (Scheme 1). In 1984, Murai et al. [11] used α‐silylalkyllithium in reactions with CO to generate lithium enolates as a result of intramolecular 1,2 silyl migration (Scheme 1). The same group subsequently exploited such migrations to access cyclopropanone enolate, allenolate, and indene derivatives. [12] Reactions of nitrogen derived lithium carbanions with CO have provided routes to N‐heterocyclic compounds [13] while dialkenyllithium, [14] or 1‐lithio‐butadienes [15] reagents react with CO to generate 3‐cyclopenten‐1‐one derivatives (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Selected reactions of alkali‐metal reagents with CO.
More recently, we have explored reactions of alkali metal reagents, noting the absence of a covalent linkage between the Lewis acidic alkali‐metal and the basic anion suggests an analogy to frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs). [16] Indeed, in our first test of this notion, alkali metal amides and phosphides were shown to reversibly activate H2 and were effective catalysts for the hydrogenation of imines or alkenes. [17] We subsequently showed that like FLPs, alkali metal phosphides reacted with CO to generate transient anionic carbene‐like intermediates, prompting either alkyl group migration from phosphorus to carbon or dimerization (Scheme 1). [18] The analogous reactions of alkali metal amides, were shown to effect CO homologation, affording (CO)n‐containing products (n=2,3,4). [19] In the presence of syn‐gas, concurrent activation of H2 and CO resulted in the both C−C and C−H bond formations, demonstrating the potential for transition metal‐free reactions mimicking the Fischer−Tropsch process. [19] In our most recent work, we have demonstrated the reactivity silylamides with CO to generate cyanide and isocyanides, respectively [20] as well as the formation of a hexafunctionalized aromatic compound from the reactions of an dilithiomethane species with CO (Scheme 1). [21]
In the present study, we describe the reactions of benzyl potassium derivatives with CO. These reactions are shown to generate carbene‐like intermediates. In addition, steric encumbrance of the benzyl anion is also shown to impact on the nature of the resulting products. While sterically unencumbered benzyl potassium afforded products derived from carbene dimerization, more encumbered reagents lead to multiple CO propagation followed by intramolecular cyclization reactions affording 5 or 7‐membered ring products. The mechanism of these reactions is supported by both experimental evidence and a detailed computational study.
A solution of benzyl potassium 1 in THF was exposed to 4 atm pressure of CO in a Schlenk bomb. A color change from clear red solution to reddish brown suspension was observed on warming to room temperature. To this suspension, one equivalent of Ph3SiCl was added and the concentrated yellow filtrate in Et2O/pentane was stored at −25 °C freezer affording yellow crystals of the product 2 in 70% yield (Scheme 2). Repetition of the experiment using 13CO (1 atm) in THF proceeded in a similar fashion. The red suspension showed no signal in the 13C NMR spectrum consistent with the insolubility of the initial di‐anionic species. However, addition of Ph3SiCl led to a clean formation of 2‐ 13 C as evidenced by the intense singlet signal at 138.72 ppm in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum. A crystallographic study of 2 confirmed the formulation as the symmetric olefin ((Ph3SiO)(PhCH2)C)2. Correspondingly, the central C−C bond length was found to be 1.334(2) Å, while the remaining metric parameters were unexceptional (Scheme 2). Repetition of the reaction of 1, followed by aqueous work up, PhCH2C(O)CH(OH)CH2Ph 3 was isolated as a yellow solid in 98% yield (See ESI).
Scheme 2.
Reactions of benzyl potassium with CO, POV‐ray depiction of the molecular structure of 2. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. C: black; O: red; Si: pink.
The formation of 2 and 3 is initiated by the nucleophilic attack of CO by benzyl potassium, generating an intermediate with carbene‐character that reacts with an additional equivalent of CO to form the anionic ketene structure, which undergoes nucleophilic attack by another benzyl potassium to generate an insoluble bis‐alkoxide species Int (Scheme 2). Efforts to detect the carbene intermediate, by low temperature 13C NMR spectroscopy were unsuccessful. Similarly, efforts to intercept the proposed carbene via reaction with 1‐hexene failed to yield the anticipated cyclopropane derivative (see ESI). These observations imply that the formation of Int is rapid.
To gain mechanistic insight into this reactivity of benzyl potassium reagents, detailed reaction course of 1 with CO in THF solution was probed computationally using the dispersion corrected hybrid DFT PW6B95‐D3/def2‐QZVP+COSMO‐RS//TPSS‐D3/def2‐TZVP+COSMO level of theory including thermo‐statistical as well as continuum solvation contributions [22] (Figure 1, for details see ESI). The dimer of 1 is computed to be 2.4 kcal/mol less stable than the separate monomers while the separated ion pair, K(THF)+ and benzyl anion is 6.6 kcal/mol less stable than the monomer KCH2Ph. These data suggest that the neutral monomer is the dominant species in solution at room temperature. However, the insertion of CO molecules into ionic K−C bonds to form carbene‐ or ketene‐like species is both kinetically and thermodynamically favored for the dimer form of 1 (see ESI). The initial CO insertion into the dimer of 1 is 3.8 kcal/mol endergonic over a low barrier (via transition state TS1, 8.9 kcal/mol with respect to two monomers of 1). This gives the carbene‐like intermediate A. A second CO addition to the carbene‐site of A is −12.1 kcal/mol exergonic over a low barrier of 7.8 kcal/mol (via TS2) generates a ketene‐like species B, which is −8.3 kcal/mol exergonic over an overall barrier of only 11.6 kcal/mol). Subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the electrophilic ketene B by the benzyl anion (via TS3) is −26.3 kcal/mol exergonic over a low barrier of 12.4 kcal/mol. This affords complex C which ultimately gives 2 and 3. In principle C could also be formed via the coupling of two carbenes A, however this is kinetically 3.1 kcal/mol less favorable.
Figure 1.

DFT‐computed reaction Gibbs free energy profile (in kcal/mol, at 298 K and 1 mol/L) of 1 with CO in THF solution. In ball‐and‐stick models, crucial K, C, H and O atoms are highlighted as violet, grey, white and red balls, respectively, with selected bond lengths (in red) shown in Å.
To further probe this reactivity, the sterically hindered benzyl potassium, K[2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2CH2] 4 was synthesized from 2,4,6‐tri‐tert‐butyl toluene and a slight excess nBuLi/KOtBu. Exposure of a clear orange THF solution of 4 to 1 atm of 13CO, resulting in a brownish‐orange suspension. Subsequently, addition of Me3SiCl resulted in formation of two products, 5‐ 13 C and 6‐ 13 C in an approximately 1 : 1 ratio based on the integration in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum. The single intense 13C NMR signal at 136.15 ppm for 5‐ 13 C was consistent with the linear olefinic species ((Me3SiO)(2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2CH2)13C)2. This formulation was confirmed as X‐ray quality crystals were isolated in 30% yield from Et2O/toluene (Scheme 3a). In the case of 6‐ 13 C, two olefinic 13C{1H} resonances at 137.45 ppm and 132.75 ppm, with a coupling constant of 94 Hz were consistent with the formulation as tBu2C6H2(13C(OSiMe3) 13C (OSiMe3)CH2). This latter formulation was further supported by repetition of the reaction followed by addition of Ph3SiCl. Work‐up and cooling of the pentane extract at −25 °C afforded the product 7‐ 13 C in 52% isolated yield. Similar to 6‐ 13 C, the 13C NMR spectrum contained two olefinic carbon resonances at 138.99 ppm and 133.25 ppm with a coupling constant of 96 Hz, consistent with a dissymmetric olefinic linkage. X‐ray data confirmed that compound 7 is formulated as tBu2C6H2(C(OSiPh3)C(OSiPh3)CH2) in which a five‐membered ring is fused to the arene ring at adjacent carbon atoms, indicating the loss of a tBu‐group (Scheme 3). Within the five membered ring the olefinic C−C bond length is 1.331(4) Å (Scheme 3b).
Scheme 3.

Reactions of 4 with CO; POV‐ray depiction of the molecular structure of (a) 5, (b) 7 (c) 9. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. C: black; O: red; Si: pink.
Interestingly, repetition of the reaction of 4 with CO, followed by anaerobic aqueous work up with degassed water, afforded a mixture of products in an overall 76% isolated yield. The mixture was consists of a α‐hydroxy ketone (2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2)CH2C(O)CH(OH)CH2(2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2) 8 and a 1,2‐diketone species 9 formulated as (2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2CH2CO)2 in an approximately 9 : 1 ratio according to the integrations in the 1H NMR spectrum (Scheme 3). The 13C resonances attributable to the C−OH and C=O of 8 were observed at 79.62 ppm and 210.89 ppm, respectively. Under similar condition reaction of 4 with 13CO afforded the formation of the isotopologues 8‐ 13 C and 9‐ 13 C which was confirmed by high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), suggesting both carbon atoms are sourced from CO. Performing the reaction with an aqueous workup in air afforded yellow crystals of the 1,2‐diketone derivative (2,4,6‐(tBu)3C6H2CH2CO)2 9 in 62% isolated yield which were recrystallized from a saturated EtOAc solution at −10 °C. In this case, the 13C resonances attributable to the carbonyl carbon was seen at 200 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum. The formulation of 9 was also unambiguously confirmed by X‐ray crystallographic study (Scheme 3c).
The isolation of 5–9 infers steric influence over the nature of the products. Indeed, our DFT calculations show that the dimer (4)2 of bulky benzyl potassium 4 is 5.9 kcal/mol less stable than two monomers, thus is further disfavored in solution. The first CO addition to 4 leads to an unstable carbene‐like complex At (Figure 2), which rapidly react with another CO to form the ketene‐like intermediate Bt in a process that is exergonic by only −0.2 kcal/mol (assumed 1 M CO) over a low free‐energy barrier of 12.9 kcal/mol (via TS2t). Nucleophilic trapping of Bt with 4 to form Ct is −15.5 kcal/mol exergonic over a very low free‐energy barrier of 3.5 kcal/mol (via TS3t). While this is kinetically and thermodynamically facile, it will be limited by low concentration of Bt at low CO pressure, consistent with the formation of linear products 5, 8 and 9. At low CO pressure, intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization of Bt affording the five‐membered‐ring species Dt is −3.1 kcal/mol exergonic over a very low barrier of 8.4 kcal/mol (via TS4t). Deprotonation by 4, and elimination of butene reduces Dt to the cyclic salt Et in a highly exergonic process over a low barrier of 15.6 kcal/mol (via TS5t). This is consistent with the formation of 6 and 7 after treatment with silyl chlorides.
Figure 2.

DFT‐computed reaction Gibbs free energy profile (in kcal/mol, at 298 K and 1 mol/L) of 4 with CO in THF solution. In ball‐and‐stick models, crucial K, C, H and O atoms are highlighted as violet, grey, white and red balls, respectively, with selected bond lengths (in red) shown in Å.
A final modification of the benzyl potassium reagent was derived from deprotonation of the triaryl toluene, 2,4,6‐(3,5‐tBu2C6H3)3C6H2Me 10 with nBuLi/KOtBu affording K[2,4,6‐(3,5‐tBu2C6H3)3C6H2CH2] 11 in 80% isolated yield. Reaction of 11 with 13CO in diethyl ether also led to a color change from dark green to dark red brown, the reaction yielded a distinct paramagnetic product 12, as evidenced by the EPR spectrum (see ESI). Simulation revealed a g=2.007 with couplings to two 13C carbon atoms (3.0, 3.9 G), the two methylene (7.0 G), and four aromatic protons (0.4, 0.3, 0.3, 1.5 G) and one t‐butyl group (0.4 G) consistent with DFT calculations for the incorporation of two 13CO fragments in the radical anion salt, K[3,5‐(tBu)2C6H2)C(O)C(O)CH2C6H2(C6H33,5‐(tBu)2)2]. 12 (Scheme 4). The 13C NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture revealed intense singlet signal at 130.75 ppm, consistent with the formation of the diamagnetic bis‐alkoxide salt 13. These observations suggest that the initial carbene intermediate reacts with additional CO to give a ketene‐like species, while competing intramolecular cyclization (with formal H‐atom loss) and dimerization give 12 and 13, respectively. Quenching the reaction with water provided [3,5‐(tBu)2C6H2)C(O)C(OH)CHC6H2(C6H33,5‐(tBu)2)2] 14 and ((2,4,6‐(3,5‐tBu2C6H3)3C6H2CH2C(O))2 15 in 12% and 13% yield, respectively. HRMS and spectroscopic data were consistent with these formulations (see ESI). [23] In particular, the 13C NMR data for 14 showed two intense doublets at 196.95 and 147.41 ppm with 1 J C‐C=61 Hz, consistent with the incorporation of two 13CO molecules. As such, this represents a unique single‐step synthesis of a tropolone derivative. Such seven‐membered aromatic species are well known for their biological activity. [24]
Scheme 4.

Reactions of 11 with CO in THF and ether affording 12–15. (Ar=3,5‐(tBu)2C6H3, Ar*=2,4,6‐Ar3C6H2). The yields of 14 and 15 were determined from the integration in 13C{1H} NMR spectrum, using a 13C enriched urea as the internal standard.
In conclusion, this report has demonstrated that benzyl potassium species react with CO to generate transient carbene‐like intermediates. In sterically unhindered cases, formal dimerization of the carbene is the dominant reaction pathway. In contrast, for reactions with increasingly sterically encumbered systems, intramolecular cyclization is increasingly competitive as carbene attack of aromatic substituents or additional CO affords avenues to 5 and 7 membered ring species. The latter 7 membered ring derivative is derived from a transient radical intermediate. We are continuing to examine the reactions of alkali metal species with CO in efforts to exploit CO as a building block for more complex organic products.
Supporting Information: Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Synthetic and spectral data, computational details and DFT‐computed energies and Cartesian coordinates are deposited. X‐ray crystallographic data can be obtained from the CCDC 2089943‐2089946.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
D.W.S. is grateful to NSERC of Canada for research support and the award of a Canada Research Chair. The Guggenheim Foundation, the Killam Foundation and the RSC(UK) are thanked for a Guggenheim fellowship, a 2021 Killam Prize and a 2021 Centenary Prize, respectively. S.G and Z.W.Q are grateful to DFG (project SPP1807) for financial support. A.R.J. is grateful for a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship for funding. M.X is grateful for the award of C.H. Bayley Scholarship. T.W. is grateful to China Scholarship Council for financial support. Dr. K. Demmans is thanked for collection of EPR spectra. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
T. Wang, M. Xu, A. R. Jupp, Z.-W. Qu, S. Grimme, D. W. Stephan, Chem. Asian J. 2021, 16, 3640.
Dedicated to Professor Christian Bruneau
Contributor Information
Dr. Zheng‐Wang Qu, Email: qu@thch.uni-bonn.de.
Prof. Dr. Douglas W. Stephan, Email: dstephan@chem.utoronto.ca.
References
- 1.
- 1a. Schulz H., Appl. Catal. A 1999, 186, 3–12; [Google Scholar]
- 1b. Fischer F., Meyer K., Brennst.-Chem. 1931, 12; [Google Scholar]
- 1c. McKee D. W., J. Catal. 1967, 8, 240–249. [Google Scholar]
- 2.
- 2a. Gattermann L., Berchelmann W., Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 1765–1769; [Google Scholar]
- 2b. Adams R., Levine I., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1923, 45, 2373–2377. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Franke R., Selent D., Börner A., Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5675–5732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.
- 4a. Sunley G. J., Watson D. J., Catal. Today 2000, 58, 293–307; [Google Scholar]
- 4b. Haynes A., Maitlis P. M., Morris G. E., Sunley G. J., Adams H., Badger P. W., Bowers C. M., Cook D. B., Elliott P. I. P., Ghaffar T., Green H., Griffin T. R., Payne M., Pearson J. M., Taylor M. J., Vickers P. W., Watt R. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2847–2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.
- 5a. Kiss G., Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3435–3456; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5b. Beller M., Cornils B., Frohning C. D., Kohlpaintner C. W., J. Mol. Catal. A 1995, 104, 17–85; [Google Scholar]
- 5c. Schoenberg A., Bartoletti I., Heck R. F., J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3318–3326. [Google Scholar]
- 6.
- 6a. Peng J.-B., Geng H.-Q., Wu X.-F., Chem 2019, 5, 526–552 ; [Google Scholar]
- 6b. Falbe J., Carbon monoxide in organic synthesis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jutzi P., Schröder F.-W., J. Organomet. Chem. 1970, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nudelman N. S., Vitale A. A., J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4625–4626. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nudelman N. S., Outumuro P., J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4347–4348. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Seyferth D., Weinstein R. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5534–5535. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Murai S., Ryu I., Iriguchi J., Sonoda N., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2440–2442. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ryu I., Hayama Y., Hirai A., Sonoda N., Orita A., Ohe K., Murai S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7061–7063. [Google Scholar]
- 13.
- 13a. Orita A., Fukudome M., Ohe K., Murai S., J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 477–481; [Google Scholar]
- 13b. Smith K., El-Hiti G. A., Pritchard G. J., Hamilton A., J. Chem. Soc.-Perkin Trans. 1999, 2299–2303; [Google Scholar]
- 13c. Iwamoto K., Chatani N., Murai S., J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7944–7948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Song Q., Chen J., Jin X., Xi Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10419–10420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Song Q., Li Z., Chen J., Wang C., Xi Z., Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4627–4629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.
- 16a. Stephan D. W., Chem 2020, 6, 1520–1526; [Google Scholar]
- 16b. Jupp A. R., Stephan D. W., Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 35–48; [Google Scholar]
- 16c. Stephan D. W., Science 2016, 354, aaf7229;27940818 [Google Scholar]
- 16d. Stephan D. W., Erker G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6498–6541; [Google Scholar]
- 16e. Stephan D. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10018–10032; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16f. Stephan D. W., Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 306–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xu M., Jupp A. R., Qu Z. W., Stephan D. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11050–11054; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 11216–11220. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Xu M., Jupp A. R., Stephan D. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3548–3552; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 3586–3590. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Xu M., Qu Z.-W., Grimme S., Stephan D. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 634–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Xu M., Kooij B., Wang T., Lin J. H., Qu Z. W., Grimme S., Stephan D. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 16965–16969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Xu M., Wang T., Qu Z.-w., Grimme S., Stephan D. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 10.1002/anie.202111486. [Google Scholar]
- 22.
- 22a.TURBOMOLE, V 7.4, TURBOMOLE GmbH, Karlsruhe, 2019, See http://www.turbomole.com;
- 22b. Tao J., Perdew J. P., Staroverov V. N., Scuseria G. E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 146401; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22c. Grimme S., Antony J., Ehrlich S., Krieg H., J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22d. Grimme S., Ehrlich S., Goerigk L., J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22e. Grimme S., Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9955–9964; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22f. Weigend F., Ahlrichs R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22g. Weigend F., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1057–1065; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22h. Klamt A., Schüürmann G., J. Chem. Soc.-Perkin Trans. 1993, 2, 799–805; [Google Scholar]
- 22i. Eckert F., Klamt A., AIChE J. 2002, 48, 369–385; [Google Scholar]
- 22j.F. Eckert, A. Klamt, COSMOtherm, Version C3.0, Release 16.01, COSMOlogic GmbH & Co., Leverkusen, Germany, 2015, ;
- 22k. Zhao Y., Truhlar D. G., J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5656–5667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The reaction of 11 and CO in THF, followed by workup also gave 15 but not 14. The six-membered 3,5-(tBu)2C6H2)C(O)CH2C6H2(C6H3)3,5-(tBu)2)2 17 was isolated in 1% yield and its radical precursor characterized by EPR spectroscopy (see ESI).
- 24.
- 24a. Chakrabarty S., Romero E. O., Pyser J. B., Yazarians J. A., Narayan A. R. H., Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 1374–1384; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24b. Liu N., Song W., Schienebeck C. M., Zhang M., Tang W., Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 9281–9305; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24c. Zhao J., Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 2597–2621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information



