Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;46(4):896–904. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2223

TABLE 3.

Urine volume output, urinary sodium excretion, PS volume and dietary fluid intake

  Analysis part A Analysis parts A + B
Secondary end point 5 mg vs placebo (n = 8) P‐value 10 mg vs placebo (n = 8) P‐value 5 mg vs 10 mg (n = 8) P‐value
Absolute urine volume, ml/day 714 (490–939) .002 795 (195–1394) .014 84 (−514 to 682) .761
Relative urine volume, % 49 (4–94) .041 34 (−4 to 71) .072 −14 (−51 to 23) .420
Urine sodium excretion, mmol/day 66 (−69 to 201) .171 88 (20–156) .017 32 (−37 to 101) .325
Urine sodium excretion, % 189 (−350 to 729) .270 432 (−87 to 951) .092 266 (−266 to 798) .287
PS volume, ml/day −94 (−344 to 156) .356 −469 (−941 to 4) .052 −380 (−851 to 91) .103
Relative PS volume, % −13 (−41 to 15) .276 −28 (−51 to −4) .025 −15 (−38 to 9) .195
Dietary fluid intake, ml/day −242 (−560 to 76) .103 −363 (−641 to −86) .015 −119 (−396 to 157) .362
Relative dietary fluid intake, % −9 (−18 to 1) .068 −15 (−25 to −5) .006 −7 (−17 to 3) .169
Plasma citrulline, μmol/L 17.7 (−6.3 to 41.7) .100 14.0 (−2.3 to 30.3) .084 −3.6 (−19.8 to 12.6) .632
Relative plasma citrulline, % 66 (−13 to 145) .077 42 (−10 to 94) .100 −23 (−74 to 29) .344

Note: Data represent mean (95% CI), adjusted for the period‐specific baseline value of each end point, PS, and dietary fluid intake in a two‐sided analysis of covariance model. Part A was also adjusted for period, whereas parts A + B assumed no period effect.

Abbreviation: PS, parenteral support.