Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 16;97(1):1–19. doi: 10.1111/brv.12788

Table 2.

Summary of mechanical testing carried out on lizard osteoderms (ODs) and comparison species, to quantify their elastic modulus and load to failure under puncture testing. *Compression puncture test was carried out using the upper jaw of various mongoose species and load to failure (unit N) was reported.

Specimen E (GPa) Testing method Reference
Turtle shell
Terrapene carolinensis 18.3–24.8 Nanoindentation Rhee et al. ( 2009 )
Chelydra serpentina 0.5–22.1 Nanoindentation Balani et al. ( 2011 )
Terrapene carolina 0.4–1.01 Compression Damiens et al. ( 2012 )
Trachemys scripta 0.9–1.7 Compression Zhang et al. ( 2012 )
Trachemys scripta 0.7–16.5 Nanoindentation Achrai & Wagner ( 2013 )
Dermochelys coriacea 0.8–1.8 Compression Chen et al. ( 2015 )
Centrochelys sulcata 3.2–5.5 Nanoindentation Jongpairojcosit & Jearanaisilawong ( 2017 )
Armadillo 0.1– 0.4 Tensile Chen et al. ( 2011 )
Dasypus novemcinctus 1.3–4.6 Microindentation Rhee et al. ( 2011 )
Alligator 0.9–1.2 Compression Sun & Chen ( 2013 )
Alligator mississipiensis 1.4–20 Nanoindentation
2.2–5.7 Compression Chen et al. ( 2014 )
Cordylidae*
Ouroborus cataphractus 63.7–79.5 (N)
Karusasaurus polyzonus 18.7–25.6 (N) Compression on sheet of ODs Broeckhoven et al. ( 2015 )
Namazonurus peersi 14.4–19.0 (N)
Cordylus macropholis 18.7–27.0 (N)
Cordylus cordylus 14.8–21.9 (N)
Cordylidae
Ouroborus* cataphractus 75.7 ± 23.5 (N) Compression Broeckhoven et al. ( 2017b )
Smaug* giganteus 110.4 ± 12.4 (N)
Heloderma suspectum 2.7–19.1 Atomic force microscopy on single OD Iacoviello et al. ( 2020 )