Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;30(23):5923–5934. doi: 10.1111/mec.16146

TABLE 2.

Comparison of computational programs for proximity‐based genome scaffolding. The programs are sorted in the descending order of the number of citations in the literature introducing the individual programs, with the exception of the programs that are not openly maintained (LACHESIS and HiRise at the bottom)

Program Description Input data requirement Other information
3d‐dnaa,b

Misjoin correction algorithm is applied to detect errors in the input assembly; compatible with multiple enzymes

Accepts only Juicer mapper format

The results can be reviewed and modified directly by JuiceBox
SALSA2c

Uses the physical coverage of Hi‐C pairs to identify misassembled regions of the input assembly; compatible with multiple enzymes

Generic bam (bed) file, assembly graph, unitig, 10x link files

The results can be visualized by JuiceBox via the included script
ALLHiCd

Scaffolding and phasing of a polyploid genome

Hi‐C read pairs; (option) associated gene annotation or chromosome‐scale genome assembly for a closely related species Generate the chromatin contact matrix to evaluate genome scaffolding
FALCON‐Phasee

Scaffolding and phasing of a diploid genome

Hi‐C read pairs; FALCON‐Unzip assembly Output two phased full‐length pseudo‐haplotypes
HiCAssemblerf

Misassemblies are corrected by iterative joining of high‐confidence scaffold paths

Hi‐C matrix of h5 format created by HiCExplorer Misassembled regions in the input assembly can be corrected by specifying the location in the program
instaGRAALg

Overhauling the GRAAL program to allow efficient assembly of large genomes

Hi‐C matrix of instaGRAAL format created by hicstuff or HiC‐Box Requires NVIDIA CUDA and can be executed in a limited environment
LACHESISh

No function to correct scaffold misjoins

Generic bam format Developer's support discontinued; intricate installation
HiRisei

Employed in Dovetail Chicago/Hi‐C service

Generic bam format Open‐source version at GitHub not updated since 2015

aDudchenko et al., 2017; bDurand et al., 2016; cGhurye et al., 2019; dZhang et al., 2019; eKronenberg et al., 2018; fRenschler et al., 2019; gBaudry et al., 2020; hBurton et al., 2013; iPutnam et al., 2016.