TABLE 1.
Percentages of included participants for different trial cutoffs
| Visual processing—Checkerboards | Face processing—Faces | Face processing—Face inversion effect | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum N trials | Percentage included relative to the recruited sample | Percentage included relative to the feasibility sample | Minimum N trials | Percentage included relative to the recruited sample | Percentage included relative to the feasibility sample | Minimum N trials for both conditions | Percentage included relative to the recruited sample | Percentage included relative to the feasibility sample |
| 1 | 84% | 98% | 1 | 84% | 98% | 1 | 84% | 98% |
| 10 | 80% | 94% | 10 | 84% | 98% | 10 | 82% | 96% |
| 20 | 79% | 92% | 20 | 82% | 96% | 20 | 77% | 90% |
| 30 | 75% | 88% | 30 | 82% | 96% | 30 | 72% | 85% |
| 40 | 69% | 80% | 40 | 79% | 92% | 40 | 66% | 77% |
| 50 | 64% | 75% | 50 | 75% | 88% | 50 | 61% | 71% |
| 60 | 74% | 87% | 60 | 43% | 50% | |||
| 70 | 70% | 83% | 70 | 3% | 4% | |||
| 80 | 67% | 79% | ||||||
| 90 | 66% | 77% | ||||||
| 100 | 62% | 73% | ||||||