Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;150(3):440–449. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33820

TABLE 2.

Sensitivity and specificity of ASCL1/LHX8 methylation and HPV16/18 genotyping for detection of CIN3+ and CIN2+, stratified by cytology class

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Relative risk
n/N % 95% CI n/N % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI 95% CI
(A) ASCL1/LHX8 methylation a
CIN3+ NILM 5/10 50.0% (19.0‐81.0%) 298/389 76.6% (72.4‐80.8%) 5.2% (0.8‐9.7%) 98.3% (96.9‐99.8%) 3.15 (0.93‐10.67%)
Low‐grade cytology 14/22 63.6% (43.5‐83.7%) 145/193 75.1% (69.0‐81.2%) 22.6% (12.2‐33.0%) 94.8% (91.2‐98.3%) 4.32 (1.91‐9.78%)
High‐grade cytology 51/59 86.4% (77.7‐95.2%) 22/42 52.5% (37.3‐67.5%) 71.8% (61.4‐82.3%) 73.3% (57.5‐89.2%) 2.69 (1.46‐4.96%)
CIN2+ NILM 9/25 36.0% (17.2‐54.8%) 287/374 76.7% (72.5‐81.0%) 9.4% (3.5‐15.2%) 94.7% (92.2‐97.2%) 1.78 (0.81‐3.87%)
Low‐grade cytology 25/55 45.5% (32.3‐58.6%) 123/160 76.9% (70.3‐83.4%) 40.3% (28.1‐52.5%) 80.4% (74.1‐86.7% 2.06 (1.32‐3.20%)
High‐grade cytology 63/83 75.9% (66.7‐85.1%) 10/18 55.6% (32.6‐78.5%) 88.7% (81.4‐96.1%) 33.3% (16.5‐50.2%) 1.33 (1.01‐1.74%)
(B) HPV16/18 genotyping
CIN3+ NILM 8/10 80.0% (55.2‐104.8%) 247/354 69.8% (65.0‐74.6%) 7.0% (2.3‐11.6%) 99.2% (98.1‐100.3%) 8.66 (1.87‐40.14%)
Low‐grade cytology 13/22 59.1% (38.5‐79.6%) 117/176 66.5% (59.5‐73.5%) 18.1% (9.2‐26.9%) 92.9% (88.4‐97.4%) 2.53 (1.14‐5.62%)
High‐grade cytology 40/51 78.4% (67.1‐89.7%) 19/37 51.4% (35.2‐67.5%) 69.0% (57.1‐80.9%) 63.3% (46.1‐80.6%) 1.88 (1.14‐3.10%)
CIN2+ NILM 10/23 43.5% (23.2‐63.7%) 236/341 69.2% (64.3‐74.1%) 8.7% (3.5‐13.8%) 94.8% (92.0‐97.5%) 1.67 (0.75‐3.68%)
Low‐grade cytology 26/52 50.0% (36.4‐63.6%) 100/146 68.5% (61.0‐76.0%) 36.1% (25.0‐47.2%) 79.4% (72.3‐86.4%) 1.75 (1.10‐2.77%)
High‐grade cytology 51/71 71.8% (61.4‐82.3%) 10/17 58.8% (35.4‐82.2%) 87.9% (79.5‐96.3%) 33.3% (16.5‐50.2%) 1.32 (1.01‐1.73%)
(C) ASCL1/LHX8 methylation a  + HPV16/18 genotyping
CIN3+ NILM 8/10 80.0% (55.2‐104.8%) 200/354 56.5% (51.3‐61.7%) 4.9% (1.6‐8.3%) 99.0% (97.6‐100.4%) 4.42 (0.95‐20.51%)
Low‐grade cytology 17/22 77.3% (59.8‐94.8%) 92/176 52.3% (44.9‐59.7%) 16.8% (9.5‐24.1%) 94.8% (90.4‐99.2%) 5.61 (1.71‐18.35%)
High‐grade cytology 47/51 92.2% (84.8‐99.5%) 10/37 27.0% (12.7‐41.3%) 63.5% (52.5‐74.5%) 71.4% (47.8‐95.1%) 2.22 (0.95‐5.18%)
CIN2+ NILM 13/23 56.5% (36.3‐76.8%) 192/341 56.3% (51.0‐61.6%) 8.0% (3.8‐12.2%) 95.0% (92.1‐98.0%) 1.43 (0.65‐3.19%)
Low‐grade cytology 36/52 69.2% (56.7‐81.8%) 81/146 55.5% (47.4‐63.5%) 35.6% (26.3‐45.0%) 83.5% (76.1‐90.9%) 2.66 (1.51‐4.66%)
High‐grade cytology 63/71 88.7% (81.4‐96.1%) 6/17 35.3% (12.6‐58.0%) 85.1% (77.0‐93.2%) 42.9% (16.9‐68.8%) 1.49 (0.94‐2.37%)

Note: Low‐grade cytology: BMD equalling ASC‐US/ASC‐H/LSIL. High‐grade cytology: >BMD equalling HSIL.

Abbreviations: ASC‐H, atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; ASCUS, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CI, confidence interval; CIN, cervical intraepthelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; LSIL, low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; N, group size; n, number of; NILM, negative for intraepthelial lesion or malignancy; NPV, negative predicted value; PPV, positive predicted value.

a

Using a predefined threshold (70% specificity).