Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;32(Suppl 21):254–288. doi: 10.1111/clr.13863

TABLE 4.

Summary of annual failure rates, relative failure rates, and survival estimates for SCs with implant‐supported monolithic zirconia crowns as reference

Type of SCs Total number of SCs Total SCs exposure time Mean SCs follow‐up time Estimated annual failure rate* (95% CI) 3‐year survival summary estimate* (95% CI) Relative failure rate** (95% CI) p‐value**
Monolithic zirconia SCs 394 611 1.6 1.31% (0.76%−2.27%) 96.1% (93.4%−97.8%) 1.00 (Ref.)
Monolithic‐reinforced glass‐ceramic SCs 452 1174 2.6 1.02% (0.51%−2.05%) 97.0% (94.0%−98.5%) 0.78 (0.33–1.83) p = 0.568
Veneered zirconia SCs 952 3633 3.8 1.27% (0.77%−2.1%) 96.3% (93.9%−97.7%) 0.97 (0.47–1.98) p = 0.927
Veneered‐reinforced glass‐ceramic SCs 93 754 8.1 0.80% (0.14%−4.64%) 97.6% (87.0%−99.6%) 0.61 (0.12–3.09) p = 0.548
Veneered densely sintered alumina SCs 128 474 3.7 1.05% 0.49%−02.29%) 96.9% (93.4%−98.6%) 0.81 (0.34–1.89) p = 0.619
Resin Nano Ceramic SCs 75 133 1.8 33.8% (4.36%−261.6%) 36.3% (0.04%−87.7%) 25.8 (5.48–121.56) p < 0.0001

C.I. stands for “confidence interval.”

*

Based on robust Poisson regression.

**

Based on multivariable robust Poisson regression including all types of SCs.