Table 6.
Study design | Setting | n | 3‐year OS | 5‐year OS | 3‐year RFS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current study | Prospective cohort study | BTS | 208 | 77.4% | 67.4% | 65.6% |
Amelung et al. 2019 † , 17 | Retrospective ITT analysis | ES | 444 | 68.3% | ||
BTS | 222 | 74.0% | ||||
Arezzo et al. 2017 18 | RCT | ES | 59 | 69% ‡ | 62% ‡ | |
BTS | 56 | 64% ‡ | 58% ‡ | |||
Ho et al. 2017 19 | Retrospective ITT analysis | ES | 40 | 45% ‡ | 35% ‡ | |
BTS | 62 | 60% ‡ | 54% ‡ | |||
Sloothaak et al. 2014 8 | Follow‐up data of RCT | ES | 32 | 78% ‡ | ||
BTS | 26 | 62% ‡ | ||||
Sabbagh et al. 2013 20 | Retrospective ITT analysis | ES | 39 | 74% | 67% | |
BTS | 48 | 51% | 30% | |||
Tung et al. 2013 21 | Follow‐up data of RCT | ES | 24 | 78% ‡ | 42.8% | |
BTS | 24 | 76% ‡ | 57.1% |
In this study 10% of patients in the cohort presented with distant metastases.
Approximate data from figures.
BTS, bridge‐to‐surgery; ES, emergency surgery; ITT, intention‐to‐treat; OS, overall survival; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RFS, relapse‐free survival.