TABLE 1.
Authors (year) | Reference | Design | Country | Sample N (baseline) | Study intervention | Study quality (α q) | Quality of life assessment | Impact of self‐treated symptomatic hypoglycaemia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure | Outcome | Direction a | Sig. | |||||||
Ali et al. (2012) | 35 | RCT | US | 2053 | Intensive versus standard glucose control | 0.58 | SF‐36 | General health | ||
Physical health | NS | |||||||||
Mental health | NS | |||||||||
Briggs et al. (2017) | 20 | RCT | Worldwide | 16,492 | Saxagliptin versus placebo | 0.77 | EQ‐5D | General health | b | <0.05 |
de Sonnaville et al. (1998) | 36 | Cohort | Netherlands | 237 | Insulin versus oral medication | 1.00 | POMS | Negative mood | c | NS |
Genovese et al. (2013) | 21 | Cohort | Italy | 1046 | Vildagliptin + metformin | 0.90 | WPAI | Work/school impairment | ||
Activity impairment | 0.001 | |||||||||
Goddijn et al. (1999) | 22 | Cohort | Netherlands | 99 | Insulin versus oral medication | 1.00 | RAND‐36 | General health | ||
Mental health | NR | |||||||||
Haluzik et al. (2018) | 23 | Cohort | Eastern Europe | 6369 | None | 0.93 | Targeted question | Work impairment | NA | |
Jódar et al. (2020) | 24 | RCT | Worldwide | 3297 | Semaglutide versus placebo | 0.77 | SF‐36 | General health | ||
Physical health | <0.01 | |||||||||
Mental health | 0.08 | |||||||||
Malanda et al. (2011) | 25 | Cohort | UK | 453 | G‐Meter versus standard monitoring | 1.00 | EQ‐5D | General health | 0.23 | |
W‐BQ12 | Emotional well‐being | 0.82 | ||||||||
Positive mood | 0.47 | |||||||||
Negative mood | 0.92 | |||||||||
Energy level | 0.46 | |||||||||
IPQ‐R | Illness perceptions | |||||||||
Illness control | NS | |||||||||
Emotional distress | 0.24 | |||||||||
Menard et al. (2007) | 26 | RCT | Canada | 72 | Intensive versus standard care | 0.88 | DQOL | DQOL | NS | |
Mitchell et al. (2013) | 27 | Cohort | UK | 1329 | None | 0.85 | HFS‐II | Fear of hypoglycaemia | d | <0.001 |
Nauck et al. (2019) | 28 | RCT | Worldwide | 3014 | Liraglutide versus placebo | 0.85 | EQ‐5D | General health | b | <0.001 |
EQ‐VAS | General health | b | 0.98 | |||||||
Nicolucci et al. (2011) | 29 | RCT | Italy | 238 | Telephone versus standard care | 0.58 | W‐BQ22 | Emotional well‐being | 0.002 | |
Positive mood | NS | |||||||||
Depressive symptoms | NS | |||||||||
Anxiety symptoms | 0.007 | |||||||||
Energy level | 0.003 | |||||||||
SF‐36 | General health | |||||||||
Physical health | NS | |||||||||
Mental health | 0.004 | |||||||||
Pathan et al. (2018) | 38 | Cohort | Southeast Asia | 2594 | None | 0.93 | Targeted question | Work impairment | NA | |
Peyrot et al. (2008) | 30 | RCT | US | 211 | Pramlintide versus placebo | 0.85 | DDS | Diabetes distress | NS | |
Pichayapinyo et al. (2018) | 31 | Cohort | Thailand | 35 | Telephone assistance | 0.85 | DDS | Diabetes distress | NS | |
SEDS | Diabetes self‐efficacy | NS | ||||||||
PHQ‐8 | Depressive symptoms | NS | ||||||||
SSQ | Social support | NS | ||||||||
PROMIS | General health | |||||||||
Sleep disturbance | NS | |||||||||
Polonsky et al. (2018) | 39 | Cohort | US | 424 | None | 0.90 | WHO‐5 | Emotional well‐being | NS | |
GAD | Anxiety symptoms | <0.01 | ||||||||
PHQ‐8 | Depressive symptoms | NS | ||||||||
DDS | Diabetes distress | <0.05 | ||||||||
HFS‐II | Fear of hypoglycaemia | |||||||||
Hypoglycaemia worry | <0.01 | |||||||||
Ritter et al. (2016) | 37 | RCT | US | 1674 | Efficacy care versus placebo | 0.77 | DSES | Diabetes self‐efficacy | 0.026 | |
Torre et al. (2018) | 32 | Cohort | Portugal | 1303 | DPP‐4 versus GLP‐1 vs.SGLT2 | 0.90 | EQ‐5D | General health | NS | |
EQ‐VAS | General health | NS | ||||||||
Wieringa et al. (2018) | 33 | Cohort | Netherlands | 911 | Insulin glargine | 1.00 | WHO‐5 | Emotional well‐being | c | 0.30 |
HFS‐II | Fear of hypoglycaemia | |||||||||
Hypoglycaemia worry | e | <0.001 | ||||||||
Yang et al. (2014) | 34 | Cohort | China | 8578 | Biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 | 0.80 | EQ‐VAS | General health | b | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: DDS, Diabetes Distress Scale; DQOL, Diabetes Quality of Life measure; DSES, Diabetes Self‐Efficacy Scale; EQ‐5D, EuroQol 5‐Dimension health status instrument; EQ‐VAS, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale; GAD, General Anxiety Disorder scale; HFS‐II, Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey version II; IPQ‐R, Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; NS, not significant (no p‐value reported); PHQ‐8, Patient Health Questionnaire 8‐item; POMS, Profile of Mood States; PROMIS, Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; RAND‐36, RAND Corporation 36‐item health survey; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SEDS, Self‐Efficacy for Diabetes Scale; SF‐36, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36‐item health survey; SSQ, Social Support Questionnaire; W‐BQ12 and W‐BQ22, Well‐Being Questionnaire 12‐item and 22‐item; WHO‐5, World Health Organisation 5‐item well‐being index; WPAI, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment.
Increases and decreases in outcomes are depicted with upward () and downward arrows (), respectively; associations of unknown direction are depicted with a dash (); black and grey symbols indicate significant and non‐significant or untested effects, respectively.
Reflects impact of severe hypoglycaemic events only.
Direction and significance of impact was similar for severe hypoglycaemic events.
Reflects impact of any hypoglycaemic event.
Direction of impact for severe hypoglycaemic events was similar but not significant, p = 0.23